247 réponses à ce sujet

[-Skorpious-]

 The title is pretty obvious. If Bioware's plan to appease us is by adding onto the current endings, it proves that they are completely missing the point of our movement. Well, lets remind them. Again, and again, and again until they finally understand the purpose behind the movement -

Bioware, you can keep the current endings as they are, but offer us additional DLC endings that coexist with the ones currently present in the game. Detailing a set of endings that have received universal hate by a significant portion of your fanbase won't win back our support (if we didn't like it the first time why would the second be any better?).

If Bioware refuses to acknowledge our requests, simply refrain from purchasing any DLC until the true nature of our concerns are addressed in a professional and serious manner. In the mean time, remain vocal. Remain civil. Hold the line. 

Modifié par -Skorpious-, 23 mars 2012 - 06:10 .

[Silent Rage]

I swear talking to bioware is like talking to a brick wall.

[mupp3tz]

From the sound of it, I get the feeling that they're going to release what basically amounts as a defense of the ending. I can't 100% say that this will fail, but I think that it will come out as "You guys just don't understand." and serve to anger/alienate people even more.

[sth128]

It's like offering a vegetarian a more elaborate meat loaf when he complained the original meat loaf is unacceptable...

[-Skorpious-]

Exactly, we have to ensure that our point is understood. If that means mindlessly bleating the same phrases over and over again, so be it.

We want new content - not the same regurgitated ending with a new coat of paint.

[The Angry One]

I will gladly pay for new endings.
I will not even look at "clarification" for the existing nihilistic garbage they call an ending.

[blah64]

I will not settle for a clarification.

[MattFini]

The Angry One wrote...

I will gladly pay for new endings.
I will not even look at "clarification" for the existing nihilistic garbage they call an ending.

Pretty much this.

BioWare, you ruined your magum opus with ten minutes to go.  

I don't want anything that tells me StarBaby is still canon - unless it's revaled that StarBaby is Harbinger.

[-Skorpious-]

We need a forum banner that says something along the lines of "we will not accept clarification - additional endings for ME3".

[Spectre-00N7]

We need to get the entire movement to come up with exactly what we want as an ending though. That way they cannot be confused.

[wright1978]

Unless that clarification includes expansion/alteration of the ending no i won't pay for it.

[Taboo]

-Skorpious- wrote...

We need a forum banner that says something along the lines of "we will not accept clarification - additional endings for ME3".

Someone tech savvy get on this.

[-Skorpious-]

Spectre-00N7 wrote...

We need to get the entire movement to come up with exactly what we want as an ending though. That way they cannot be confused.

We can't write it entirely for them, but I support a ending where the relays are preserved. And of course the removal of the star-child, but I think he will be a permanent fixture in the endings, sadly. 

Modifié par -Skorpious-, 23 mars 2012 - 06:27 .

[TomY90]

We will have to wait and see what they are doing about the ending whether they are going down the path like Mass Effect 2: Arrival DLC did which was add to the ending.

or if its going down the path like Fallout 3: Broken Steel DLC where it alters the ending and in Bioware's cause add more to the ending with fixing holes.

I imagine it will be a combination of the two in which it fixes plot holes like the normandy etc.

Whilst showing you what happened to your squad and the galaxy afterwards.

(might add a mission and some multiplayer content with it as well but we will have to see)

[1490]

This is why you want to wait a couple days and wait to see what the reviews say about the DLC - FAN REVIEWS, I might add.

[pjotroos]

Yeah, we've already had whole pages of posts clarifying what happens in the ending, and how it doesn't make any sense. We even had one guy draw arrows and stuff to explain it:
http://social.biowar...ndex/10475315/1
If they leave everything as is and only add extra cutscenes saying: "Joker, EDI, Liara and all your other friends spend the rest of their life trying to get away from the Gilligan Planet", it will show that in the end our opinion did not matter, and all they did is faked listening for the sake of keeping up appearances. It is their game, and it is their right to do it. If that happens, I'll just try to get a refund for my game. Nothing else you can do if they don't want to have you supporting them.

[ShepnTali]

If you murder a franchise, clarification won't cut it.

[kimuji]

The Angry One wrote...

I will not even look at "clarification" for the existing nihilistic garbage they call an ending.

That's what disturbed me the most with the ending, it is not a happy or sad end, it's just nihilistic, what the starchild says is just pure nihilism as well as his "solutions" (And not forgetting the fact that it doesn't makes sense with what Sovereign and Harbinger said in the previous games).

Bioware said they made an artistic ending, very well, but Mass Effect deserves better than a nihilistic closing. It deserves better than ending on a questionnable ideology. And so do the writers, they deserve better. They have to take back all what happens after we kill TIM, for the sake of the franchise and their own as well.

Modifié par kimuji, 23 mars 2012 - 06:34 .

[pjotroos]

-Skorpious- wrote...

Spectre-00N7 wrote...

We need to get the entire movement to come up with exactly what we want as an ending though. That way they cannot be confused.

We can't write it entirely for them, but I support a ending where the relays are preserved. And of course the removal of the star-child, but I think he will be a permanent fixture in the endings, sadly.

Just keep linking Jeremy Jahns video, or this entry on gamefront whenever the subject pops up. We can't get everyone to agree with anybody's post, but I didn't see any retaker disagree with either of those 2.

[staindgrey]

I normally hate boycott bandwagons. But I'm on-board.

"Clarification" can kiss my ass. I could clarify why my dog crapped on your doorstep, but that doesn't change the fact that there's crap on your doorstep.

[gmboy902]

Here's what I'll do. I'll wait for the release. I'll wait a few more days to see what people think about it. Then I'll decide to buy or not buy based on that.

If all they add is some crummy epilogue for 10 bucks, then obviously I won't pay for it.

[Amagoi]

Don't have to ask me. If they hold a magnifying glass to a turd, it's just a better view of a turd. No one wants clarification, we want new endings that reflect your pre-launch statements!

[Coolfaec]

The Angry One wrote...

I will gladly pay for new endings.
I will not even look at "clarification" for the existing nihilistic garbage they call an ending.

Bioware can flip me off while giving me the dlc, I just want mass effect to be fixed, so I can play it again, and go on with my life.

[Spectre-00N7]

-Skorpious- wrote...

Spectre-00N7 wrote...

We need to get the entire movement to come up with exactly what we want as an ending though. That way they cannot be confused.

We can't write it entirely for them, but I support a ending where the relays are preserved. And of course the removal of the star-child, but I think he will be a permanent fixture in the endings, sadly. 

Yeah, I doubt taking out the starchild is even an option in their eyes.  Let's just hope we get a couple more options other than RGB that allow alternatives to mass genocide or separation of the universe for many years to come.  Also, Normandy isn't stranded on a random planet and is still fighting on Earth.

Modifié par Spectre-00N7, 23 mars 2012 - 06:43 .

[Dark Specie]

Agreed, only "clarification" won't cut it...