113 réponses à ce sujet

[earthonline]

 see here:

from @masseffect:
http://imgur.com/eMYVd 

they say:
"Not changed, but we are creating new content to clarify and add closure"

DIscuss

Do you think that is enough? Will it satisfy the fans?

For reference, here is the list of current endings:
ME3 Endings List

[Darth Malice113]

They can't really change it .They seem to have wrote themselves into a corner.

[T-Bone101]

yes this is great for me closure is great just tell me ******SSPPPPOOOILLLERR*** lol

[Skirlasvoud]

I'm wondering how they'll clarify blowing up the universe and stranding everybody.

As long as there's a varying, satisfying ending to all the different races and companions, I don't care if Shepard dies. I just wast to know where everybody ends up in a way that makes sense.

And the list of current endings is extremely poor. If focusses on just a few details while we miss the bigger picture.

Modifié par Skirlasvoud, 24 mars 2012 - 02:49 .

[HectorTheWellEndowed]

Again. The ending should have already made sense in the final product. They are just trying to take more of our money. And they will get nothing from me.

[kbct]

Here's the main thread on it:

http://social.biowar.../index/10534386

[BootyBamBoo]

It makes sense to me. What i think they're doing is adding more endings/closure to the game.

[earthonline]

Darth Malice113 wrote...

They can't really change it .They seem to have wrote themselves into a corner.

but cant they ADD new endings? without changing existing ones?

[Chala]

Er...
I found a pic of Liara "as God brought her" on the link that you gave.

Modifié par El_Chala_Legalizado, 24 mars 2012 - 02:58 .

[T-Bone101]

Skirlasvoud wrote...



I'm wondering how they'll clarify blowing up the universe and stranding everybody.

As long as there's a varying, satisfying ending to all the different races and companions, I don't care if Shepard dies. I just wast to know where everybody ends up in a way that makes sense.

And the list of current endings is extremely poor. If focusses on just a few details while we miss the bigger picture.

how did they blow up the universe?


and maybe they leaving room for ME4 to keep story going? lol

[T-Bone101]

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

Er...
I found a pic of Liara "as god brought her" on the link that you gave.

WOW I just noticed that since you said something lol

you deserve a cookie lol

[Chala]

T-Bone101 wrote...

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

Er...
I found a pic of Liara "as god brought her" on the link that you gave.

WOW I just noticed that since you said something lol

you deserve a cookie lol

In my case, it was the first thing I saw
Anyway...
Where is my cookie?!

[OdanUrr]

earthonline wrote...

 see here:

from @masseffect:
http://imgur.com/eMYVd 

they say:
"Not changed, but we are creating new content to clarify and add closure"

DIscuss

Do you think that is enough? Will it satisfy the fans?

For reference, here is the list of current endings:
ME3 Endings List

We already knew this from Dr. Muzyka's earlier statement.

[AlphaDormante]

I wasn't entirely fond of the idea for a whole overhaul, anyway. I'd frankly be happy if they pulled the Indoc Theory and made it canon.

[T-Bone101]

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

T-Bone101 wrote...

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

Er...
I found a pic of Liara "as god brought her" on the link that you gave.

WOW I just noticed that since you said something lol

you deserve a cookie lol

In my case, it was the first thing I saw
Anyway...
Where is my cookie?!

Pick one lol
https://encrypted-tb...QXdbeUHYIqD5I9A

[OdanUrr]

AlphaDormante wrote...

I wasn't entirely fond of the idea for a whole overhaul, anyway. I'd frankly be happy if they pulled the Indoc Theory and made it canon.

Problem is a lot of people wouldn't, count me among them. No, I'm thinking the only way they can get by relatively unscathed is by sticking to the endings (as in, yes, this did happen) and expanding on them.

[hardermob5]

If this is all Bioware is doing, then a) they just don't get it and I'm done with them.

[AlphaDormante]

OdanUrr wrote...

AlphaDormante wrote...

I wasn't entirely fond of the idea for a whole overhaul, anyway. I'd frankly be happy if they pulled the Indoc Theory and made it canon.

Problem is a lot of people wouldn't, count me among them. No, I'm thinking the only way they can get by relatively unscathed is by sticking to the endings (as in, yes, this did happen) and expanding on them.

To be fair, they've already pissed off a lot of people. They're going to have outrage if they fix the endings. If they don't fix the endings. If they add stuff. If they retcon. If they use Indoc Theory. If they don't use it. Once you've already offended someone, it's a lot harder to get on their good side again.

I'm just hoping that whichever route they take, it pleases more people than it ticks off.

[OdanUrr]

AlphaDormante wrote...

I'm just hoping that whichever route they take, it pleases more people than it ticks off.

I'm sure that's written on a whiteboard somewhere.

[wheelierdan]

i think its a purely financial decision. the fact is theres a huge portion that didnt like it and a gue portion that did. of those who liked it a portion of those only like it because they believe the end didn't happen. When those people find out it did happen... They won't like it anymore.

They are going to upset people no matter what they do, so they can choose some epilogue thing, or they can remake the endings. Epilogue is cheaper.

[da mighty rEAper]

lmao at that dick telling ****, the game itself was rushed and has different lvls of quality in different areas of gameplay. ENJOY YOUR WINE ****

Modifié par da mighty rEAper, 24 mars 2012 - 04:30 .

[Demodog35]

It really is a financial consideration. It would probably be just cheaper for them to add epilogue material and expand/clarify the ending as they are. However, while the epilogue route has the benefit of being fairly cost effective and really probably being only a short term loss, it almost certainly will produce a long term loss. That long term loss coming in the form of decreased sales from dlc, sales from exsisting franchises and any new IP they create.

If they go the route of changing the endings it will end up costing them quite a bit more in the short term. So much so that EA/BioWare will probably see that cost reflected when they post the current quarters earning statements. The other side to this to is that even if they change the endings, there is no gaurentee for them that it will sell well. Additionally, in the worst case scenario, they change the endings, take a huge loss up front and then still see reduced sales/revenue for dlc, exsisting franchises and new IP.

Financially speaking EA/BioWare is going to lose money over this. The question is exactly how much it will eventually be. It's sad really, because BioWare is in a position of "damned if they do/ damned if they dont". What makes the situation worse is that it was a.) easily avoidable and b.) something they did to themselves.

[SnakeSNMF]

All I really care about is the Relays being destroyed.


If Bioware makes a new ending where they are not, hopefully it's canon, and one I want.

[djspectre]

I think the idea of closure will help the fanbase. The reason is that we want to know that our choices across 3 games made a difference in the lives of the squadmates/npc's/homeworlds we visited mattered.

Some people may not like Samara, or Jack, or Miranda, or whoever...but we'd like to know that if we decided that Miranda (et al) was a douchebag/amazing, that they got what we wanted (violent death/salvation).

There are plot holes to amend, but I think that the biggest beef is wtf happen to the major player we encountered over 3 games.

[earthonline]

I think that if they should just add new changes not just "clarification" or "closure" or we will be in the same place where we were