113 réponses à ce sujet

[0rthod0x]

Lilarcor01 wrote...

I'm really curious how adding new content to 'clarify' will lead to various endings which reflect our decisions.

No idea. I'm a bit more interested in the logic behind the solution. Avoiding sarcasm, I just want to know what makes it so infallible.

[AlanC9]

Subject M wrote...


That is a logical thing to do. Any having more endings would continue the proud Bioware RPG-tradition.

Actually, they should remove endings if they want to continue the Bioware tradition. Three is too many.  BG1 and NWN1 had one ending, BG2-ToB, KotOR, and DA:A had two. DA:O had one with some  flavor variants.

[Accism]

AlanC9 wrote...

Subject M wrote...


That is a logical thing to do. Any having more endings would continue the proud Bioware RPG-tradition.

Actually, they should remove endings if they want to continue the Bioware tradition. Three is too many.  BG1 and NWN1 had one ending, BG2-ToB, KotOR, and DA:A had two. DA:O had one with some  flavor variants.

ME3 has one with some flavor variants too.

[kalle90]

Well if indoctrination theory is true then that's to be expected. I don't really see how they could actually cut out the current ending and replace it with a new one (and they shouldn't do that because some people like the current ending, and the new one could be a lot worse as hard it is to believe)

[earthonline]

AlanC9 wrote...

Subject M wrote...


That is a logical thing to do. Any having more endings would continue the proud Bioware RPG-tradition.

Actually, they should remove endings if they want to continue the Bioware tradition. Three is too many.  BG1 and NWN1 had one ending, BG2-ToB, KotOR, and DA:A had two. DA:O had one with some  flavor variants.

I dont think they can remove anything
because some people already got those endings

[LoneStorm]

kalle90 wrote...

Well if indoctrination theory is true then that's to be expected. I don't really see how they could actually cut out the current ending and replace it with a new one (and they shouldn't do that because some people like the current ending, and the new one could be a lot worse as hard it is to believe)

I don't see how they possibly 'clarify' the current endings besides indoc. theory which I would like but doubt.

And DLC is optional anyway, you don't have to download it.

[FatalX7.0]

Liara...has purple nipples.

[Christianswe]

Hmmm.. I really don´t like they way they put that statement. It could kinda put the problem back again. What i don´t understand, why not add endings??? Why just have one?? In mass effect??
Look at Dragon age origins, that is an excellent ending right there. So please bioware. Fix this the right way. Please.

[Mizar_Panzar]

They can't really drastically change the ending.

I hope this DLC (or better, patch) is free, and if it is not, then I'll have to see what others say about it first before buying it.

[earthonline]

Mizar_Panzar wrote...

They can't really drastically change the ending.

I hope this DLC (or better, patch) is free, and if it is not, then I'll have to see what others say about it first before buying it.

why cant they change it drastically?

[Starchs]

T-Bone101 wrote...

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

T-Bone101 wrote...

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

Er...
I found a pic of Liara "as god brought her" on the link that you gave.

WOW I just noticed that since you said something lol

you deserve a cookie lol

In my case, it was the first thing I saw
Anyway...
Where is my cookie?!

Pick one lol
https://encrypted-tb...QXdbeUHYIqD5I9A

I wish we got cookies at the ending of ME3,

Little Kid: By the way, do you want Red cookies, Green Cookies, or Blue Cookies

Sherpard: Are they any of choices?

Little Kid: What? and ruin my art

[SwitchN7]

Of course it's The Indoctrination theory with every little thing in the ending happening in Shepard's broken/falling apart mind symbolizing Hope and Never giving up or backing down followed closely by the real ending via DLC(EA's disgusting little fingers just like the Day 1 DLC) where Sheppard draws breath and so on...Prince of Persia did it disgustingly tasteless,Fallout 3 as well,why not Mass Effect? Hope it will be worth the price...Good luck and have a nice day.

Modifié par SwitchN7, 24 mars 2012 - 11:15 .

[SynheKatze]

This surely is disrupting their plans for future DLCs (because they were there all along), so they have two optios: a) make it cheap and release it for free, as to avoid the outrage, however I don't think it will please many fans, release enough content for it to be called a expansion and make it worth buying, this would literally break their previous plans and pose the risk of not recovering their investment. However, if they did decide to add these endings with some decent aditional content a la Cerberus Network, things could get interesting...

It's a pity, because whatever you do, the "your choices matter" idea is going to be reduced to a few numbers and not mean anything at all.

Modifié par SynheKatze, 24 mars 2012 - 11:20 .

[Martanek]

Thanks for the spoilers in this thread. You are very kind. I really appreciate telling me about blowing up the universe, it is always good to know beforehand.

[Comguard2]

Asked the Twitter account if true or fake.

No answer.

[muse108]

Honestly no. not for me. For me Bioware needs to come out and admit they were wrong at this point and give us a new ending. The god child needs to go and the relays need to exist and not just blow up. We need a satisfactory ending not some bs about building synthetics to kill us so we dont build synthetics that kill us.

Edit: The blog by the foudner of Bioware said basically the same thing as that twitter. They are going to BUILD on the end, nothing about changing it.

And for the record while I'd pay for a new satisfactory ending I will not be buying any DLC until I get it.

Modifié par muse108, 24 mars 2012 - 11:28 .

[Taritu]

For goodness sakes, could they just patch the actual continuity problems, like teleporting crew members? I mean, the ending is awful, but seeing people who were in London, oh 15 minutes ago on the Normandy is the sort of sloppy BS that would get your story flunked in a creative writing class.

[TrveOmegaSlayer]

The game finishes but what is there it's not an ending.
When the real ending will be available (and I'm sure it will be free) it will add to the decisions you made in this pre-ending.

[bazzag]

I really don't mind, as long as there is closure to the story, extra dialogue, plotholes filled in and a more diverse ending instead of them all being virtually identical. and add an epilogue thing too

[Kakita Tatsumaru]

If OP is true the Bioware will put a real ending...to Bioware.

[Heimdall]

earthonline wrote...

 see here:

from @masseffect:
http://imgur.com/eMYVd 

they say:
"Not changed, but we are creating new content to clarify and add closure"

DIscuss

Do you think that is enough? Will it satisfy the fans?

For reference, here is the list of current endings:
ME3 Endings List

Is it enough to satisfy the angry fans?  I doubt it, but I think it's all we could have expected.

[Skirlasvoud]

T-Bone101 wrote...

Skirlasvoud wrote...



I'm wondering how they'll clarify blowing up the universe and stranding everybody.

As long as there's a varying, satisfying ending to all the different races and companions, I don't care if Shepard dies. I just wast to know where everybody ends up in a way that makes sense.

And the list of current endings is extremely poor. If focusses on just a few details while we miss the bigger picture.

how did they blow up the universe?

and maybe they leaving room for ME4 to keep story going? lol

Destroying the relays creates a supernova that destroys everything in the neighbourhood, including the victory fleet, earth and all major planets. All three endings show the relays scatter. The universe as we know it, seizes to exist.

Modifié par Skirlasvoud, 24 mars 2012 - 03:15 .

[Solas]

I hope they clarify teleporting final squad and what the **** the Normandy was doing by the Sol Relay.