Aller au contenu

Photo

Dark Ritual - a selfish act as a Grey Warden?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1807 réponses à ce sujet

#701
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

I wouldn't want to. They seem to be like dragons - and dragons have the tendancy to eat people and burn villages.
That doesn't spur my confidence.

we are talking old gods, they are different. Andraste the dragon was a powerful and intelligent enough beast to make a deal with the people of haven and be kind of peaceful. and yet the darkspawn didn't care for that one. they went for one who had  helped humanity before become a giant powerful empire. oh im pretty sure they still have some dragonish traits to them, but last time they lived with humanity they didn't destroy them, they actually helped.

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Oh, God..you're one of THOSE.. The power of
Love redeems everyone camp. I've run into peopel that wrote fanfic of
even the biggest, LITERALY soulless monsters being redeemed by the
power of love.
If only it was taht easy.
So Morrigan took a fancy
to your character (if that was even real and not an act) and sudenly
that will turn her into a good and caring person and a great mother?
Yeah right...

well and ive been thinking all the time "what a self-righteous intolerant ******", but the way i am makes me all queasy about calling you that because i can see where you are coming from, you make your first judgement without seeing it from the other side and you stand by that.
she didn't take a fancy for my character (female character), but we were in it together and so i extended her a hand and never has she betrayed my trust.
no she wont be the awesomest mother, but the child will live and morrigan won't teach the child that friendship and giving people a chance is worthless (there is however the slim possibility wshe will tell that friendship is a good way to screw people over and get what you want) and the child will be cared for.

#702
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Alex Savchovsky wrote...
It seems you missed a lot of her personality.
You expect her to have a special attitude towards human life much like you do. But it wouldn't make ANY sense for her, being grown up in the Wilds with hardly any social contacts. She believes in "survival of the fittest", not it human superiority. Quite literally she does not have any reason to care for someone who is obviously not the fittest.
This said, isn't it curious that the argument that makes her agree on you is "you could be one of them"?


No, I went after Morrigan with one of my chars. I'm not missing anything.

Selecting the "you could be one of the," stops her from pushing it any further, but she stil lgives back a snippy remark how she would "kill herself first" or something liek that and still dissaproves. And I got high coercion skills to boot.
So yea...it's sad that her mother made like like that, but that still doesnt change the fact that's she's a b****.

#703
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

robertthebard wrote...
...and yet you bring morallty into this?  Morallity is loosely good/evil.  If you think something is immoral, it's a logical step to call it evil.  So, by your own words, as soon as you bring morallity into it, you lose, so, take your own advice, and don't get into it, nobody cares.  This from me, that views it as a selfish act.


There is a difference between talking about morals (widely accepted around hte wrold) and going all philosophicla bout their meaning and stuff, onyl to dillute the isse and steer the conversaton in another direction.




While we're discussing morality, why, in the name of any gods, should my female City Elf give a rat's ass what happens to Denerim?  Because I'm a Grey Warden?  News flash, I became a Grey Warden under duress, to avoid being executed for killing a right bastard that deserved to die.  So I traded an instant death sentence for a postponed one?  Why wouldn't she think that letting Loghain or Alistair get a little would be bad, since it means that she would for sure survive the encounter with the Archdemon.  Is it selfish, surely.  I have never tried to say otherwise, but I have also not tried to justify not doing it with logic, because logically, in the City Elf origin, or depending on how you played through the mage origin, it was better to risk becoming a Grey Warden than the alternative.  Not everyone that joins the ranks of the Wardens does so out of altruistic motives, just as with the Legion of the Dead, they may very well have had no good choice in the matter.  Especially since, when you become a Grey Warden, you don't know that you may ultimately have to sacrifice your own life to save people that you may indeed feel don't deserve to be saved.


Again, the personal feeling of your character are irrelevant to the discussion. One of my characters took the ritual because he wanted to. Doesnt' matter why. Every character has different motivations and assumptions and acts on those.

That doesn't change the basics of what constitutes a smart decision.
The ritual isn't one. Some characters simply dont' care about some variables and emitt them from the decision making process.

Modifié par Lotion Soronnar, 09 décembre 2009 - 11:57 .


#704
Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien
  • Members
  • 5 177 messages

XOGHunter246 wrote...

everyone entitled to to their opinion your right guess we will agree to disagree. one thing though how is not doing it selfish your still doing what your meant to do not conceiving a child which could be a good/bad thing sure morrigan may seem trust worthy but she is very intelligent and can easily manipulate you like she has done to reach her own goals. i doubt she could careless about you dying anyway just whats that child!. why didn't she tell us in first place about this if she was doing it to save you, she wait till now to tell us?


Why she waited?

I'll admit that is a good question, I can think of her reasonings, especially considering her attitude.

Firstly it is not her place to tell you of the 'sacrifice' a warden has to make, that should have been up to Duncan or another Warden. Think about it, going on the basis of you not knowing, you are going into the battle thinking it doesn't matter who kills it, you are just there because you are good at 'sensing darkspawn'.

Another reason for her not telling us, kind of falls back to something that is said when you first encounter her and flemeth when flemeth gives you the warning to give Duncan about the blight (or did she just refer to it as a 'threat'?) being more serious than they originally thought and one of the options you get to respond to that is that you are sure they will take her words seriously (or words to that effect).

Think about this, you just got rescued by Flemeth and Morrigan, granted you owe them your lives and whilst if you thank Flemeth she does state it is you they should be thanking (though that now of course has a double entendre in the fact she is thanking you for giving them the opportunity to do the ritual), would you really have believed them if they had told you about the other 'Warden' secret that they knew of?

Alastair certainly wouldn't, he just lost his mentor and father figure and he got some 'Witch of the Wilds' telling him that Duncan didn't tell him the real kicker of being a Warden when a Blight is occurring?

Now there is the question of if you chose a male PC and end up romantically in love with Morrigan and thus soften her up, why didn't she tell you prior to Redcliffe?  That is a good question, course the other poser there is why didn't she just do the ritual then? Well from the way she speaks during the ritual conversation it has to take place at a certain time.

The other thing to point out in this situation, we don't entirely know what the ritual entails (other than the obvious sex part), that major issue aside, she obviously has to explain why and how the ritual will work to convince the PC of either taking part or getting Alastair/Loghain to take part. It is then up to the player if they tell them why it will work if going down that route or just keep them in the dark.

Way I see it, the ritual must require both parties to be willing and involved in it. Some could say Morrigan could have easily controlled the player/alastair/loghain into doing it, but she doesn't. That to me shows (from an OOC perspective) that she isn't as bad as some people make her out to be.

Regarding the question of why not doing the ritual could be classed as selfish. Again it is due to the reasoning behind refusing it, am not saying every reason is selfish, it is just that there is some reasons which are.

Selfish reasons being... you despise Morrigan and won't have anything to do with her even if she could just well save your life (in some respects if you account her mother into the equation, for the 2nd time). The term "Pride comes before a fall" springs to mind in that instance. The most funniest selfish reason for refusing out of the lot is the whole issue of being romantically involved with someone else. Especially if it is Alastair!?! Sorry ladies, but I really can't see how you see her doing the ritual as bad just because she having sex with Alastair, considering she is ensuring you both will live after the battle. Yes it could mean that she has a son whom has just as much right as being heir to the throne as any kids of your own does. But I think Morrigan is actually on a higher power state of mind than some throne of a realm (mother of a god>mother of a king). From a male PC whom is in love with Leliana, you want to try to spend the next 29 years with her right? Morrigan is giving you that choice and before anyone says Alastair/Loghain could give you that choice, sorry but you just proved how selfish you are going on the assumption they would.

I would just like to state that I don't entirely hold the above views, I am just stating them as reasons why people could see them in such a fashion.

As I said before, it is a matter of choice and as such there is always going to be various opinions on it.

On a relating note, one thing am going to be intrigued about "Return to Ostagar" is that this situation can apparently happen after Lothering, so that means this 'Warden' you beat Riordan to seeing you, so I suppose the question will be, is he really a Warden? If so, is he a newish recruit like Alastair who hasn't been told of the sacrifice. Also the way I see it, that guy can't survive the quest surely because otherwise Riordan would need a whole re-write to account for people whom may do that quest before meeting Riordan.

Modifié par Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien, 09 décembre 2009 - 12:01 .


#705
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Crrash wrote...

we are talking old gods, they are different. Andraste the dragon was a powerful and intelligent enough beast to make a deal with the people of haven and be kind of peaceful. and yet the darkspawn didn't care for that one. they went for one who had  helped humanity before become a giant powerful empire. oh im pretty sure they still have some dragonish traits to them, but last time they lived with humanity they didn't destroy them, they actually helped.


Are they different? There's no evidence the Old Gods helped humanity in any way.
What we do know is that an archdemon looks and act like a tainted dragon.
So it's safe to assume that an untainted archdemon (Old God) would look and pratty much act like an untainted dragon. If fact, there's no evidence that Old Gods are nothing more than High Dragons in the first palce.

And all the dragons you came across in the game just wanted to eat you.


Lotion Soronnar wrote...
well and ive been thinking all the time "what a self-righteous intolerant ******", but the way i am makes me all queasy about calling you that because i can see where you are coming from, you make your first judgement without seeing it from the other side and you stand by that.
she didn't take a fancy for my character (female character), but we were in it together and so i extended her a hand and never has she betrayed my trust.
no she wont be the awesomest mother, but the child will live and morrigan won't teach the child that friendship and giving people a chance is worthless (there is however the slim possibility wshe will tell that friendship is a good way to screw people over and get what you want) and the child will be cared for.


I can see things from all sides, thank you very much.
If you want to gamble with your child on the idea what Morrigan WILL teach her about love and friendship and respecting your fellow man, go ahead. That's even assuming she will have any control over hte supposed god-child.
Me, I'm not gullible enough to belive that.

#706
Alex Savchovsky

Alex Savchovsky
  • Members
  • 250 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Selecting the "you could be one of the," stops her from pushing it any further, but she stil lgives back a snippy remark how she would "kill herself first" or something liek that and still dissaproves. And I got high coercion skills to boot.


Weird, she didn't do anything like this on both my playthroughs. She said something about she always wondered if thing could be different despite what Flemeth told her and did not disapprove. No snippy remarks or anything. I don't even think I used a (Persuade) line anywhere in the dialog, so you should be able to convince her no matter if you have coercion or not.

#707
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

She quite literaly considers them weak and stupid and worthy of only death. Evne the kids. And you cna't really convince her otherwise, you can only shut her up. Try to persuade her otherwise and she still dissaproves.

ok ijust fired up my save just before the circle tower.
1) Alistair immediately agreed that the circle tower has to be purged
2) Morrigan mused about how ironic it is that people who let themselves be controlled by others (imprisoned but not actually physically imprisoned) die literally imprisoned in their tower.
3) Morrigan does say that as they let themselves be controlled by others, let them be killed by those that control them, since thats the fate they have chosen for themselves. to this you can answer "this could have been you". morrigan responds that flemeth always tells her that things are only as they are and couldnt be different... and that she always doubted that (making it clear that she now imagines what if she were in their shoes) and agrees to help them out (no disapproval). never did she mention children in particular, just generally mages (she just holds children to the same standards as adults)

Modifié par Crrash, 09 décembre 2009 - 01:13 .


#708
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien wrote...
Way I see it, the ritual must require both parties to be willing and involved in it. Some could say Morrigan could have easily controlled the player/alastair/loghain into doing it, but she doesn't. That to me shows (from an OOC perspective) that she isn't as bad as some people make her out to be.


Isn't mind control a high-level blood mage ability? Morrigan isn't a high-level blood mage lore-wise.
I don't think she can simply control you into having sex with her.

As a side note - how do Flemeth and Morrigan even know of all these Grey Warden secrets? This is highly suspicious and it seems to me like they were doing this before.

#709
marshalleck

marshalleck
  • Members
  • 15 645 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien wrote...
Way I see it, the ritual must require both parties to be willing and involved in it. Some could say Morrigan could have easily controlled the player/alastair/loghain into doing it, but she doesn't. That to me shows (from an OOC perspective) that she isn't as bad as some people make her out to be.


Isn't mind control a high-level blood mage ability? Morrigan isn't a high-level blood mage lore-wise.
I don't think she can simply control you into having sex with her.

As a side note - how do Flemeth and Morrigan even know of all these Grey Warden secrets? This is highly suspicious and it seems to me like they were doing this before.


Well, they had unfettered access to that Warden tower in the Wilds for who knows how long.

#710
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

And all the dragons you came across in the game just wanted to eat you.

there is one comparatively young dragon whom you called after killing all of the people who believed in it/her/whatever and all its young. of course it'd be angry and try to eat you.
then theres flemeth whom you told you would kill her. of course she'd be angry and try to eat you.
and finally we've got an archdemon who being tainted and all is out to destroy everything anyway

I can see things from all sides, thank you very much.

you can? doesnt seem like it, but if you say so... yay?

If you want to gamble with your child

not my child. alistairs dna. and both alistair and i seem to not consider it a child of any of us, we only helped out morrigan have a child.

Me, I'm not gullible enough to belive that.

good for you! im totally ok with that! me? i choose to trust my friend.

Modifié par Crrash, 09 décembre 2009 - 12:24 .


#711
Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien
  • Members
  • 5 177 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien wrote...
Way I see it, the ritual must require both parties to be willing and involved in it. Some could say Morrigan could have easily controlled the player/alastair/loghain into doing it, but she doesn't. That to me shows (from an OOC perspective) that she isn't as bad as some people make her out to be.


Isn't mind control a high-level blood mage ability? Morrigan isn't a high-level blood mage lore-wise.
I don't think she can simply control you into having sex with her.

As a side note - how do Flemeth and Morrigan even know of all these Grey Warden secrets? This is highly suspicious and it seems to me like they were doing this before.


Flemeth has at least been around since before the 3rd Blight, somehow
in that timescale I think she will have learned about the Wardens. As for doing it before, I believe they have tried but back in the previous blights the wardens simply refused (just as the PC can). As I mentioned in my rather big post above, it brings new meaning to Flemeth thanking you and Alastair when you try thanking her for saving your lives because she goes on to spout about the Wardens being necessary and she knows she has got the two newest Wardens that she and Morrigan in some respects can now manipulate (I will admit that they did manipulate the characters, can't escape that truth) into doing what they want.

As for Morrigan, I was just
using that as an example, if the other person wasn't really needed
other than just being there for her to have her wicked way with her,
she could easily have just knocked the PC, Alastair or Loghain out and
done it if she really was that evil. There is a difference between being manipulative and being evil, I may be proven wrong in a future game where we get to find out possibly why she wanted the old-god baby, but at this moment I still don't see her (from an OOC perspective) as being such, even though some of my characters might do.

#712
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Crrash wrote...

there is one comparatively young dragon whom you called after killing all of the people who believed in it/her/whatever and all its young. of course it'd be angry and try to eat you.
then theres flemeth whom you told you would kill her. of course she'd be angry and try to eat you.
and finally we've got an archdemon who being tainted and all is out to destroy everything anyway.


Oh.. I thought it was the case of villagers(cultist) finding a sacrifice, blasting the horn and getting the hell out of there. Dragon is attracted by the horn, comes, sees crunchy sacrifice, eats it and is happy.

I belive David said that dragons are just beasts. No great intelligence. I don't think it cares about the "followers" at all.



not my child. alistairs dna. and both alistair and i seem to not consider it a child of any of us, we only helped out morrigan have a child.


I'm not interested in what your character belives, but what is.


good for you! im totally ok with that! me? i choose to trust my friend.


Blind trust is a wonderfull thing, isn't it?

#713
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien wrote...
As for Morrigan, I was just
using that as an example, if the other person wasn't really needed
other than just being there for her to have her wicked way with her,
she could easily have just knocked the PC, Alastair or Loghain out and
done it if she really was that evil.


Nah, she couldn't have done that. There are others in the camp too and making enemies of me or Alistair is not a good idea.
It would be very risky.

#714
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

I belive David said that dragons are just beasts. No great intelligence. I don't think it cares about the "followers" at all.


from the wiki: "Dragons are large, powerful, and natural animals. The
intelligence of the average dragon can be compared to that of a real
world dolphin.
"
so they are very intelligent. they are pretty happy if the followers care for the childrten and the children are ok. if you kill them all, its going to be pissed.

I'm not interested in what your character belives, but what is.

what? do you even listen to yourself? we are talking about a child and if you are okay with morrigan having it. this is highly subjective. you feel it would be your child and you wouldn't trust morrigan to have sole custody of the child. thats quite alright.
i however feel that a) its a friggin old god, it'll be alright and morrigan will make sure it will be alright and B) we all agreed as adults that neither i nor alistair have any claim on the child and we are only helping a friend (a friend tha alistair dislikes even) to have a child (and btw, saving our own hides :P a nice side effect). It's how i'd act in real life and as such it's how the character whom i decided to act like me in-game will act. Call it what you want, but it is so.


Blind trust is a wonderfull thing, isn't it?

ignorance truly is bliss, not that i'd recommend it. but apart from that, not being mistrusful of friends who never did you wrong, just come from a bad family and have a different worldview, is nice too.

Modifié par Crrash, 09 décembre 2009 - 02:33 .


#715
robertthebard

robertthebard
  • Members
  • 6 108 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

robertthebard wrote...
...and yet you bring morallty into this?  Morallity is loosely good/evil.  If you think something is immoral, it's a logical step to call it evil.  So, by your own words, as soon as you bring morallity into it, you lose, so, take your own advice, and don't get into it, nobody cares.  This from me, that views it as a selfish act.


There is a difference between talking about morals (widely accepted around hte wrold) and going all philosophicla bout their meaning and stuff, onyl to dillute the isse and steer the conversaton in another direction.




While we're discussing morality, why, in the name of any gods, should my female City Elf give a rat's ass what happens to Denerim?  Because I'm a Grey Warden?  News flash, I became a Grey Warden under duress, to avoid being executed for killing a right bastard that deserved to die.  So I traded an instant death sentence for a postponed one?  Why wouldn't she think that letting Loghain or Alistair get a little would be bad, since it means that she would for sure survive the encounter with the Archdemon.  Is it selfish, surely.  I have never tried to say otherwise, but I have also not tried to justify not doing it with logic, because logically, in the City Elf origin, or depending on how you played through the mage origin, it was better to risk becoming a Grey Warden than the alternative.  Not everyone that joins the ranks of the Wardens does so out of altruistic motives, just as with the Legion of the Dead, they may very well have had no good choice in the matter.  Especially since, when you become a Grey Warden, you don't know that you may ultimately have to sacrifice your own life to save people that you may indeed feel don't deserve to be saved.


Again, the personal feeling of your character are irrelevant to the discussion. One of my characters took the ritual because he wanted to. Doesnt' matter why. Every character has different motivations and assumptions and acts on those.

That doesn't change the basics of what constitutes a smart decision.
The ritual isn't one. Some characters simply dont' care about some variables and emitt them from the decision making process.

Actually, the personal feelings of my character are the only ones that matter.  This is a SP game.  The "Why did this character choose this option" is very much a part of this conversation.  My city elf is the one that did the ritual, having Loghain service Morrigan's needs.  As I said before, morals are fluid, despite what you claim above.  Morals are not "(widely accepted around hte wrold)", despite what you want to preach here.  Morals are a product of your upbringing, and just because you may find something unacceptable does not mean that the person next to you in line at the supermarket will as well.  Reality check, in game and out, the world isn't so black and white as you'd like to pretend it is.  If it were, there would be no wars, no famine, and no need for prisons.  This is not a question of absolutes, as there can be no absolutes. 

The decisions that I made in that particular chain of events doesn't affect what happens in your game, and doesn't affect what happens in my subsequent games.  As I stated earlier in this thread, I made the decision to do the ritual, in the one game where I did make that decision, for purely selfish reasons.  I wished to live.  The child, a result of Morrigan and Loghain coupling, has nothing to do with me, other than playing match maker for an evening.  In this point alone, the "solid arguement" you tried to make that caused me to quote you in the first place is totally invalid, thereby invalidating everything else you said.  My City Elf was female, and even if Morrigan swang that way, the resulting coupling could not produce the child, nor the moral dilemma you claim.  The fact that Morrigan ran off with Loghain's child means nothing to me.

#716
robertthebard

robertthebard
  • Members
  • 6 108 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Crrash wrote...

there is one comparatively young dragon whom you called after killing all of the people who believed in it/her/whatever and all its young. of course it'd be angry and try to eat you.
then theres flemeth whom you told you would kill her. of course she'd be angry and try to eat you.
and finally we've got an archdemon who being tainted and all is out to destroy everything anyway.


Oh.. I thought it was the case of villagers(cultist) finding a sacrifice, blasting the horn and getting the hell out of there. Dragon is attracted by the horn, comes, sees crunchy sacrifice, eats it and is happy.

I belive David said that dragons are just beasts. No great intelligence. I don't think it cares about the "followers" at all.



not my child. alistairs dna. and both alistair and i seem to not consider it a child of any of us, we only helped out morrigan have a child.


I'm not interested in what your character belives, but what is.


good for you! im totally ok with that! me? i choose to trust my friend.


Blind trust is a wonderfull thing, isn't it?

Herein lies the root of the problem.  I'm not a Grey Warden, I just played one in a video game.  When making decisions in the video game, I am making them as my character.  This thread doesn't ask if I would do this as a human being.  It asks if I thought doing the ritual as a Grey Warden was a selfish act.  Since I'm not a Grey Warden in real life, what I might do, and what you might do in real life is irrelevant to the topic.  So, your points are both off topic, and irrelevant then.  Glad we cleared this up.

#717
T0paze

T0paze
  • Members
  • 388 messages
I think every player can find a justification for performing the Dark Ritual.

Few, however, could be more believable than those of a mage, unless that mage is indoctrinated by the Chantry beyond any hope, like Wynne.

I mean, a mage missing an opportunity to bring an uncorrupted Old God into the world? One of those who taught humanity magic in the first place? It's like, I don't know, a blacksmith passing on a chance to resurrect Hephaestus.

As for the risk - well, everyone keeps saying that Morrigan could lie to the PC, but the PC could lie to her just as easily. Just agree to her terms for now and keep her under house arrest / track her down after the battle.

It was an easy choice, actually. Maybe because my PC has always been a mage first, and only then a Grey Warden.

Modifié par T0paze, 09 décembre 2009 - 03:37 .


#718
Dark83

Dark83
  • Members
  • 1 532 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Well, I don' really see anyone
knowing about it. The darkspawn might sense it (but let's not forget
Flemeth had some means of keeping them away/confusing them).

Too
bad she's dead.

Would the Fade demons know? I don't
know.

They know about anyone of power, so why
not?

Tevinter Imperium? Who's gonan tell them?

Why would
they even care?

Alex Savchovsky wrote...

Dark83 wrote...
I did not say she's deceiving her love. I'm saying she's deceived you for the whole game - period.


The line I quoted says:
"She grew up in such a manner that long term deception of the one she loved (assuming you romanced her) was fine."

It's simply not the case. She planned to use the PC, sure. She didn't tell him that straight, sure (would you?). But she didn't love him either. So in fact she simply hid part of the truth from a complete stranger. I fail to see the problem with that. Unless your problem is that *you* happen to be the complete stranger and you are universally trustworthy so you're deeply hurt when someone doesn't recognize that instantly. Quit thinking as a gamer for a moment and think in-character.

Right, in-character - "This person who's been following me because her mom told her to help me, it turns out she was part of a conspiracy to do some funky ritual using me. She lacks foresight, no sense of compassion, no respect for life, and apparently is bipolar given her different reactions to similiar transactions. Gee - I SURE TRUST HER!"
Also - from the first time I've posted I've been trying to do an objective analysis of the situation, not being "in-character" as the "dude who boned her". thx. See, in the real world, there are situations where the consequences are so dire you have to be objective. I'm in finance, doing compliance and working towards becoming a chief compliance officer. You don't do **** like "oh, I trust her because I've worked with her for a while and slept with her - I know her inside out!" affect your decisions, or you end up personally liable if your company gets screwed.

There's also gaurantee the Old Gods are good, by the way. People worship pretty much everything when they have no understanding of science and are still developing mythology. There's been plenty of dieties in our past who are worship for the sake of appeasement.

#719
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

Dark83 wrote...

Also - from the first time I've posted I've been trying to do an objective analysis of the situation, not being "in-character" as the "dude who boned her". thx. See, in the real world, there are situations where the consequences are so dire you have to be objective. I'm in finance, doing compliance and working towards becoming a chief compliance officer. You don't do **** like "oh, I trust her because I've worked with her for a while and slept with her - I know her inside out!" affect your decisions, or you end up personally liable if your company gets screwed.

very true, but the question is "dark ritual - a selfish act as a grey warden?" and not what is the best solution. and again, fact is that some characters have unselfish reasons to do it, no matter how stupid the reasoning can be and what bad consequence may come of it.

Modifié par Crrash, 09 décembre 2009 - 04:13 .


#720
Dark83

Dark83
  • Members
  • 1 532 messages
Actually, to go back to the question in the topic...

...based on what objective facts we have (the final set that nobody challenged), we know:
If we accept the ritual, then there is a chance, however small, that there is an additional Blight.
If we reject the ritual, then a Grey Warden needs to deal the final blow, and he or she will die.

Over the course of our preparations, we will have killed well over a thousand darkspawn (including numerous ogres), several dragons, hordes of undead, and legions of demons and abominations. Not to mention any mortal stupid enough to get in our way. That's... legendary in scope. The Warden is an invulnerable badass. I mean, the things a small group (consisting of 1 new Grey Warden, 2 non-Wardens, and a dog) encountered and killed are all - to the common soldier - undefeatable and lethal (according to the codex). Has anyone in the history of Thedas killed multiple High Dragons, and all those things - within a year? The trade-off of "we have it slightly easier to kill the Archdemon" is, in that context, practically irrelevant.

The trade off is "increased chance of Blight" vs "save the life of myself or my friend". Which is absolutely selfish, no question about it.

Edit: Wait, I guess Flemeth isn't literally a High Dragon, eh? Hmm... Still, we just (supposedly) killed a legendary monster that've older than Ferelden.

Modifié par Dark83, 09 décembre 2009 - 04:21 .


#721
Alex Savchovsky

Alex Savchovsky
  • Members
  • 250 messages

Dark83 wrote...

Actually, to go back to the question in the topic...

...based on what objective facts we have (the final set that nobody challenged), we know:
If we accept the ritual, then there is a chance, however small, that there is an additional Blight.
If we reject the ritual, then a Grey Warden needs to deal the final blow, and he or she will die.

Over the course of our preparations, we will have killed well over a thousand darkspawn (including numerous ogres), several dragons, hordes of undead, and legions of demons and abominations. Not to mention any mortal stupid enough to get in our way. That's... legendary in scope. The Warden is an invulnerable badass. I mean, the things a small group (consisting of 1 new Grey Warden, 2 non-Wardens, and a dog) encountered and killed are all - to the common soldier - undefeatable and lethal (according to the codex). Has anyone in the history of Thedas killed multiple High Dragons, and all those things - within a year? The trade-off of "we have it slightly easier to kill the Archdemon" is, in that context, practically irrelevant.

The trade off is "increased chance of Blight" vs "save the life of myself or my friend". Which is absolutely selfish, no question about it.



Your analysis is quite one-sided. Oh, yes, that are the objective facts. But actually, you make your decisions vastly based on your beliefs. The entire morality is a system of beliefs and it's a base used for taking countless decisions, many of which had significant effect on the human history. Take the crusades, for example. Armies marching thousands of kilometers to fight a hopeless war for nothing. This is simply the way that humans act. For objective analysis, we have computers. Curios fact: we don't trust them to make decisions. Wonder why? :)
So in the end, it is completely wrong to take character's beliefs out of the analysis. Which makes it impossible to generalize "yea, it's a selfish act". It could be selfish or not. Depends entirely on the motivation.


P.S.

Dark83 wrote...

Right, in-character - "This person who's been following me because her mom told her to help me, it turns out she was part of a conspiracy to do some funky ritual using me. She lacks foresight, no sense of compassion, no respect for life, and apparently is bipolar given her different reactions to similiar transactions. Gee - I SURE TRUST HER!"

I meant in-HER-character. The opinion of your character is entirely valid, but hardly a relevant argument.

Modifié par Alex Savchovsky, 09 décembre 2009 - 05:59 .


#722
robertthebard

robertthebard
  • Members
  • 6 108 messages

Dark83 wrote...

Actually, to go back to the question in the topic...

...based on what objective facts we have (the final set that nobody challenged), we know:
If we accept the ritual, then there is a chance, however small, that there is an additional Blight.
If we reject the ritual, then a Grey Warden needs to deal the final blow, and he or she will die.

Over the course of our preparations, we will have killed well over a thousand darkspawn (including numerous ogres), several dragons, hordes of undead, and legions of demons and abominations. Not to mention any mortal stupid enough to get in our way. That's... legendary in scope. The Warden is an invulnerable badass. I mean, the things a small group (consisting of 1 new Grey Warden, 2 non-Wardens, and a dog) encountered and killed are all - to the common soldier - undefeatable and lethal (according to the codex). Has anyone in the history of Thedas killed multiple High Dragons, and all those things - within a year? The trade-off of "we have it slightly easier to kill the Archdemon" is, in that context, practically irrelevant.

The trade off is "increased chance of Blight" vs "save the life of myself or my friend". Which is absolutely selfish, no question about it.

Edit: Wait, I guess Flemeth isn't literally a High Dragon, eh? Hmm... Still, we just (supposedly) killed a legendary monster that've older than Ferelden.

This is the the one immutable fact; no matter what, one of the Wardens must die.  We know this not from Morrigan, but from Riordan, who has volunteered to be the one to strike the killing blow.  In all of the battles that our character goes through, this is the one battle where it is 100% guarenteed that someone has to die to stop the Archdemon.  In all of the rest of the situations that the PC finds themselves in, there is a chance that everyone will live.  In this one thing, it is guarenteed that somebody must die.  This perspective seems to be missing from everybody's moral dilemma speeches about the ritual.  The fact that this burden is placed squarely on the PC, since Riordan, as Alistair, is more of a follower, than a leader, other than it seems he spends a lot of time relatively safe, until he decides to be a ****** and jump off a tower onto the Archdemon.

Now, at this point in the game, we have already spared, or killed Loghain.  In the case of my City Elf, I had spared him to let him suffer the consequences of what he'd done.  Making him the one thing he seemed to despise as much as Orlais, a Grey Warden.  Upon learning that one of the Warden's must die, why would I want to allow the possibility of Loghain getting that final blow, and being a hero?  I'm not prepared to die, and I'm not prepared to gamble on Riordan getting the killing blow on the Archdemon.  Understand, also, that all of this was done on my first play through, w/out having read anything in the spoilers section about what happens.  I made these decisions on my own, playing my character according to how I'd played it all the way through.  In other words, there is initially a 1 in 3 chance that I'm going to have to throw my life away to save a people that I don't really care about one way or the other.  No way I'm taking those odds when another way guarentees that I'll survive, and still stop the blight.  Believe, if there had been an option to wait a couple of day for Denerim to be completely destroyed before we went, I might have taken that on that play through.  Whether Ferelden deserved to be saved or not, she knew she had to stop the blight if she wanted a chance to live somewhere familiar.  Denerim, on the other hand...

All of these real life comparisons are moot, unless of course you are really a Grey Warden, and are indeed facing this choice.  Since you're likely not, the only point that matters is is doing the ritual selfish as a Grey Warden.  My answer is unequicably yes.  Yes, it is selfish.  Is it otherwise immoral?  No.  I would assume that that child will be well protected by Morrigan, and I would also assume that she intends to do what she has learned from Flemeth's Grimoires.  While this may be taken as an evil act, it's an evil act towards a child that in my particular game is a) not my own, and B) that I will never, presumably according to the deal made, meet.  It is very likely that Morrigan will lose herself in the Wilds, or as it turns out, in the Frostback Mountains, never to be seen again, unless she figures prominently in the sequel...

All this talk of creating another blight by agreeing to this is a stretch beyond stretches.  Blights are historically centuries apart, not decades.  If all the darkspawn had to do was corrupt the next Old God, then they have been lax at Blight making, since there are still two more they presumbably know exactly where they are.  So to all this talk of we create another blight, I have one thing to say:  Enchantment!Posted Image

#723
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

Dark83 wrote...

Over the course of our preparations, we will have killed well over a thousand darkspawn (including numerous ogres), several dragons, hordes of undead, and legions of demons and abominations. Not to mention any mortal stupid enough to get in our way. That's... legendary in scope. The Warden is an invulnerable badass. I mean, the things a small group (consisting of 1 new Grey Warden, 2 non-Wardens, and a dog) encountered and killed are all - to the common soldier - undefeatable and lethal (according to the codex). Has anyone in the history of Thedas killed multiple High Dragons, and all those things - within a year? The trade-off of "we have it slightly easier to kill the Archdemon" is, in that context, practically irrelevant.

Andraste, the high dragon, and Flemeth are optional, so your warden might actually not be that confident against a tainted old god. also defeating the dragons might not have been easy and only barely survived. same goes for all battles (every time i saw a game over screen and then played again and then won i count as barely surviving, also of course all the times only one character is concious and with low health at the end of the battle). a real army of darkspawn and an archdemon? seems way more difficult, if you barely survived those times, how can you expect to survive that time?

unselfish (to various degrees) reasonings:
-afraid that the three wardens might all die (and variations, like afraid that you and riordan might die and you want alistair to survive because you don't want anora to become queen, or loghain doesn't deserve the honor of being the hero)
-you want to save the old god.
-you want to survive, not for you, but to spare others grief or to continue doing good (like helping out the legion of the dead in the deep roads)
-Morrigan asked for a favor and since she is a friend and you see no big problems and have no moral qualms, you do it.
-You've had sex with her anyway, what difference is it going to make doing it once more?
-and of course you might just be evil and actually want the old god child to be evil and destroy things. (actually might this be selfish? after all, you possibly want to destroy people because you were forced to become a grey warden, or something. dunno.)

and probably more

Modifié par Crrash, 09 décembre 2009 - 07:33 .


#724
Alex Savchovsky

Alex Savchovsky
  • Members
  • 250 messages

Crrash wrote...

-and of course you might just be evil and actually want the old god child to be evil and destroy things


Errr... I see a problem with this one. If you want an evil powerful entity, why bother killing the Archdemon at all?

#725
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

Alex Savchovsky wrote...

Crrash wrote...

-and of course you might just be evil and actually want the old god child to be evil and destroy things


Errr... I see a problem with this one. If you want an evil powerful entity, why bother killing the Archdemon at all?

dunno. crazy? :P
or maybe trying to first become a total hero to gain power and THEN destroy everyone, for some reason.
part of a bigger plan that we mere mortals of low intellect will never comprehend?