Well, if it's true then I really don't know what to say.
Grand Sol War? I united the galaxy so they could rip each other apart?
FTS.
(Priestly: Rumors are fake) Possible leak of April 24th DLC and next game? Either this, or an elaborate fake
Débuté par
Malevolence65
, mars 24 2012 02:44
-
Ce sujet est fermé
- Show only BioWare posts
Retour en haut
#277
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:25
krogstor
-
- Members
- 265 messages
Bioware is probably sitting in their chairs right now going "YEAH, THAT'S NOT THE REAL ENDING! *whisper: how the **** did this get out? Get me the team, we need answers.*"
#278
Guest_Opsrbest_*
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:26
Guest_Opsrbest_*
Guest_Opsrbest_*
-
- Guests
I agree. It's hard to tell the difference at this point with how the endings are as they stand. The timeline and dates provided are also pretty indicative that this "leak" posted by the OP may be more genuine that it appears. However from what I can gather the progession of the Conflict points are all linear. They don't seem to be centralized as to what would happen based on the endings since they all culminate in one singular and direct fashion. Even for conflict 1 to stand the endings of Synthesis and Control in ME3 would in some way need to be invalidated since Shepard dies quite clearly in those endings. It's Severe electocution or complete "evaporation" (since Shepard doesn't really get incinerated).PeterG1 wrote...
Opsrbest wrote...
I would have to agree. The first conflict point only works if you chose to destroy the Reapers. It just doesn't consider the other two ending options.
If it's real: It's hard to tell because they use so many internal monikers and code names. These "conflicts" could be either internal conflicts that the team is trying to figure out or could be some kind of name for the conflict that results after Shepard makes his A,B,C decision in ME3.
So "1" arises if Shepard destroys the reapers, "2" is synthesis and "3" is control (potentially). 4 could arise from any of 1,2,or 3 if Shepard is, perhaps, Renagade or something.
It's so hard to tell, who knows. But I am becoming convinced more and more that this "leak" is either real or crafted by someone who knows both the lingo of creative development and was very creative in coming up with these creative ideas and internal monikers.
The only portion of what the OP posted that I can see making sense is the Advent story line brought in part with how the Catalyst appears and the applied meaning of the figure in Shepards dreams. But even then thats a very thin veil to use for anything since Shepard would almost have to survive and thats quiet clearly not the case.
In order for any of the OP's post to happen it would almost make the Indoctrination Theory the correct choice beacsue thats the only way to allow for Bioware to move the story line in the manner that the notes suggest. Which in and of itself has been proven to have flaws. So.......
FTS.
Modifié par Opsrbest, 25 mars 2012 - 03:31 .
#281
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:29
Chernaya
-
- Members
- 5 136 messages
Jamie9 wrote...
EionaCousland wrote...
I refuse to believe this is real. If they'd kill off one of my favorite characters, the last way I'd want them to do it is have them commit suicide. I'm sure they'd know how many people would be pissed off from that.
This is where I actually think "artistic integrity" is true. If BioWare wants to kill a character, they shouldn't stop for fear of fan reaction.
It'd be nice if choices matter, and they did or didn't die depending on them. But choices don't matter, so they'd probably just die.
Can't argue with you on that one. I wouldn't be as opposed to the idea if choices played a part and there was a way to prevent... but who knows, lol.
#282
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:30
GigaTheToast
-
- Members
- 369 messages
Ummm, don't see how this works with the current ending. But I certainly wouldn't be complaining if it's true, sounds damn cool.
#283
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:30
wicked_being
-
- Members
- 1 328 messages
Uh...where did this leak come from again?
#284
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:32
krogstor
-
- Members
- 265 messages
wicked_being wrote...
Uh...where did this leak come from again?
4chan, but i'm not dismissing this as reality unless it simply doesn't happen.
#285
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:33
PeterG1
-
- Members
- 241 messages
krogstor wrote...
Dx = Drew Karpyshyn?
Dx often stands for "director" or "creative director" in development docs. So they'd be refering to Casey Hudson here, his approvals, checks, etc.
#286
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:33
AtreiyaN7
-
- Members
- 8 395 messages
4chan does not strike me as a particularly credible source of anything. Wasn't it also the source of "The Truth" DLC rumors? Well, at least the idea of Filbert the elcor is outrageous enough to make me laugh.
#287
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:33
aliengmr1
-
- Members
- 737 messages
krogstor wrote...
Dx = Drew Karpyshyn?
no, he's done with games
#288
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:34
krogstor
-
- Members
- 265 messages
PeterG1 wrote...
krogstor wrote...
Dx = Drew Karpyshyn?
Dx often stands for "director" or "creative director" in development docs. So they'd be refering to Casey Hudson here, his approvals, checks, etc.
Eww, in that case I've lost my intrigue in to this potential title. Thanks for clarifying though.
#289
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:35
wicked_being
-
- Members
- 1 328 messages
krogstor wrote...
wicked_being wrote...
Uh...where did this leak come from again?
4chan, but i'm not dismissing this as reality unless it simply doesn't happen.
Well I suppose you're right. Reading the original post made me say huh? and scratch my head a couple of times but at this point in time, it's better than ME3's ending.
#290
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:35
Kilshrek
-
- Members
- 4 134 messages
And we return to speculation, like a dear old friend.
#291
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:36
DonYourAviators
-
- Members
- 211 messages
lol making the player play as the Starchild is just too good. Not even BioWare could think of that.
#292
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:38
aliengmr1
-
- Members
- 737 messages
Filbert is a stupid name but that could be just temporary.
More concerned with the fact the 2 of the ending leave nothing left of Shep, and destroy would have taken EDI out of the equation.
More concerned with the fact the 2 of the ending leave nothing left of Shep, and destroy would have taken EDI out of the equation.
#293
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:42
Liraelx
-
- Members
- 168 messages
Every release of this nature for everything that I've ever come across has been fake, but the only way my brain can reconcile someone coming up with the ending of ME3 is to set things up for an ME4. I doubt this is it, but it wouldn't surprise me if they made another game (though I'd be maaad pissed they didn't just tell us and save us all a lot of trauma).
#294
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:43
krogstor
-
- Members
- 265 messages
aliengmr1 wrote...
Filbert is a stupid name but that could be just temporary.
More concerned with the fact the 2 of the ending leave nothing left of Shep, and destroy would have taken EDI out of the equation.
If you can't come up with a reasonable explanation for it =
#295
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:43
Tritium315
-
- Members
- 1 081 messages
If we play as starchild first thing I'd do is jump off a ****ing cliff.
#296
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:45
Skypezee
-
- Members
- 975 messages
aliengmr1 wrote...
Filbert is a stupid name but that could be just temporary.
More concerned with the fact the 2 of the ending leave nothing left of Shep, and destroy would have taken EDI out of the equation.
I dunno, a biotic elcor named Filbert might end up being the next badass character since Blasto.
Anyways, it seems to be a very rough draft of sorts.... like they're just throwing ideas around. Assuming that this is real of course. Otherwise, it just seems like it's fake.
#297
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:45
JohnLena
-
- Members
- 101 messages
So this Advent character has Starchild in him? If so, he should be the antagonist, cause its, well, Starchild.
#298
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:48
krogstor
-
- Members
- 265 messages
JohnLena wrote...
So this Advent character has Starchild in him? If so, he should be the antagonist, cause its, well, Starchild.
I think BW is trying to paint starchild as the good guy.
#299
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:50
Clayless
-
- Members
- 7 051 messages
Yeah it's 4chan people. Nothing to see here.
#300
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 03:51
PeterG1
-
- Members
- 241 messages
Liraelx wrote...
Every release of this nature for everything that I've ever come across has been fake, but the only way my brain can reconcile someone coming up with the ending of ME3 is to set things up for an ME4. I doubt this is it, but it wouldn't surprise me if they made another game (though I'd be maaad pissed they didn't just tell us and save us all a lot of trauma).
Yes this is exactly what I'm thinking. Not only the endings we have in ME3 now, but why BioWare has pretty much said that they plan to address, clarify and add closure to the current endings. NOT add in additional, alternative endings.
If, despite all the uproar that's happened, BW isn't giving new endings, additional endings, this seems to make the most sense why. The OP could still be fake, but if it were real, this would make sense.
