One thing I don't understand: I hate the ending just as much as the next guy and I have been agreeing with you guys in the past few weeks on pretty much any gripe you had.
But why would this be such a bad idea, if it were true?
I mean, I see the problem, the Shepard being the Catalyst thing is ****ing stupid, but the important part, to me, seems to be that you - the player - don't know about this little tidbit of information until "Mass Shift", or so they are planning right now. Which means, all we get in the DLC (IF the leak is legit, of course) is the little mission to rebuild Shep, him giving a speech that ends the conflict for Earth's resources and then him retiring with his LI or something like that (the "branch: Marriage" thing).
To me, this seems like the best possible solution; the people who like the current ending (and there ARE a few of them out there) can keep them and not play "Terminator", us retakers hopefully get resolution, closure and a higher note to end the series (which is pretty much as it should be in a three-act-story). And if they decide to keep the Advent thing for Mass Shift...
...well...
...we can all just not buy Mass Shift.
But we would finally be able to play the trilogy and not being afraid of the ending again. Am I really alone with this?
EDITED because the standard form destroyed my formatting.
Modifié par Loreshield, 25 mars 2012 - 06:26 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
