why does Shepard survive only in red ending?
#26
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:00
#27
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:01
flatifm wrote...
But if indoctrination theory isn't true, that doen't make any sence.
it's the renegade choice. and a renegade believes in survival at any cost. destroying sentient machines in order to assure survival. Shepard surviving that choice is merely a reaffirmation of the renegade mindset.
Modifié par pistolols, 24 mars 2012 - 04:01 .
#28
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:05
#29
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:07
Falconee wrote...
At the end, they can always tell us it isnt Shepard you see. It could be James Vega as well who joined the N7 program.
But, that doesnt make it any better and i really doubt it is someone else.
Yeah and the code bits that were posted specifically said "Shepard_lives ending"
#30
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:07
#31
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:12
#32
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:14
#33
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:15
#34
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:15
Darc_Requiem wrote...
It still doesn't make sense though. I mean Cerberus used Reaper Tech to resurrect Shepard for the Lazarus Project. If EDI and the Geth die, when they were both AI's before Reaper Tech, then why does Shepard survive. Miranda's comments about the Lazarus Project in ME2 indicate that cybernetics were needed to bring Shepard back.
The most amusing is that the starchild tell you that you will die in the destroy ending since you are part synthetic but you "survive"
#35
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 04:34
The blue ending makes little sense unless its all indoctrination, because otherwise I'm not sure how you get to control all the reapers when its explained in previous games all reapers operate independently of each other.
As for the synthesis ending
For best results grab a smoke then watch the ending while playing the Jimmy Hendrix-All Along The Watchtower for the full space magic effect.
Modifié par zaalbar76, 24 mars 2012 - 04:35 .
#36
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:54
Revanmug wrote...
Darc_Requiem wrote...
It still doesn't make sense though. I mean Cerberus used Reaper Tech to resurrect Shepard for the Lazarus Project. If EDI and the Geth die, when they were both AI's before Reaper Tech, then why does Shepard survive. Miranda's comments about the Lazarus Project in ME2 indicate that cybernetics were needed to bring Shepard back.
The most amusing is that the starchild tell you that you will die in the destroy ending since you are part synthetic but you "survive"
Well Goddler has been trolling for millions of years, so he should be good at it.
#37
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:55
flatifm wrote...
If indoctrination theory is true, surviving in red ending makes sense.
But if indoctrination theory isn't true, that doen't make any sence.
How could shepard wakes up in the piles of rubbles?
Anyone knows reasonable casue about this?
It's killing me.
Did you even read the Indoctrination Theory? If you did, go back and read it again.
#38
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:55
That's the best explaination you're going to get.
#39
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:55
Revanmug wrote...
Darc_Requiem wrote...
It still doesn't make sense though. I mean Cerberus used Reaper Tech to resurrect Shepard for the Lazarus Project. If EDI and the Geth die, when they were both AI's before Reaper Tech, then why does Shepard survive. Miranda's comments about the Lazarus Project in ME2 indicate that cybernetics were needed to bring Shepard back.
The most amusing is that the starchild tell you that you will die in the destroy ending since you are part synthetic but you "survive"
What makes you think that "kid" knows everything?
#40
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:57
#41
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:57
#42
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:59
We have to speculate.
#43
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:59
#44
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 05:59
From what I've heard Red ending(which I chose) the devs saw as the "selfish choice"... which I didn't see apparently because THE WHOLE POINT OF THE SERIES IS DESTROYING THE REAPERS... but I digress.
It's literally a little easter egg, that's it, for what they saw as "the selfish ending".... I could be wrong, really, really wrong but it's what I've heard.
#45
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 06:01
#46
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 06:02
flatifm wrote...
If indoctrination theory is true, surviving in red ending makes sense.
But if indoctrination theory isn't true, that doen't make any sence.
How could shepard wakes up in the piles of rubbles?
Anyone knows reasonable casue about this?
It's killing me.
Control and Synthesis absorbed his body.
Destroy was a tube blowing up, which may not have killed him.
#47
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 06:03
Modifié par syroz, 24 mars 2012 - 06:05 .
#48
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 06:04
And I'm supposed to listen to this thing?
To trust it?
Screw that, destroy the Reapers at any cost...
Any cost...
Modifié par Bill Casey, 24 mars 2012 - 06:04 .
#49
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 06:13
Falconee wrote...
At the end, they can always tell us it isnt Shepard you see. It could be James Vega as well who joined the N7 program.
But, that doesnt make it any better and i really doubt it is someone else.
No, it's Shep. Try playing as femShep....lo and behold, there's a woman in the rubble....imagine that...
#50
Posté 24 mars 2012 - 06:16
pharsti wrote...
Its simple really, they know some people want Shepard to survive, so they use a bad thing to balance it.
"So, you want to live eh? Well then, kill the Geth and EDI and its done!"
If not for that, everyone would choose that choice without even thinking.
I'm thinking this as well.





Retour en haut







