Aller au contenu

Photo

Tome of Knowledge Wiki updated October 23


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
52 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Lucy Glitter

Lucy Glitter
  • Members
  • 4 996 messages

Calydon wrote...

I'd like to know who the Shems are.


Shemlen translates as, "quick children" and is used by elves to describe humans.

#27
Napoleon1853

Napoleon1853
  • Members
  • 584 messages
Cool about the update.

#28
caspertjuhh

caspertjuhh
  • Members
  • 210 messages
very very nice.

#29
Nakhra

Nakhra
  • Members
  • 28 messages
Awesome. The glyph of repulsion seems very powerful indeed. Blast you bioware, confusing me even more about spells!

#30
Deviija

Deviija
  • Members
  • 1 865 messages
Tis very lovely and useful!

#31
Arcite550

Arcite550
  • Members
  • 311 messages
Dev, can I date your avatar? lol

#32
HighMoon

HighMoon
  • Members
  • 1 703 messages
Neat! Thanks.

#33
Daerog

Daerog
  • Members
  • 4 857 messages
Quote from history of chantry 3: "...she was burned at the stake in what the Imperium believed to be the most painful punishment imaginable."
Really? Burning at the stake was the most painful in their minds? And they were Blood Mages? Wow, all I have to say is that they must have been really, really behind torture technology compared to Europe during its dark age. Just a random thought while reading...

Edit: That Tranquil page makes me want to meet some Tranquils in-game. Sounds interesting.

Modifié par DaerogTheDhampir, 18 octobre 2009 - 08:10 .


#34
Furism

Furism
  • Members
  • 9 messages
Chris,

The first thing you want to do is create categories. Before it becomes a big mess. Believe me, I built a fairly popular Wiki in the past, and you don't want to edit every page of the website later on if you can do it now. A good place to start is the spells, because you probably want to tie them to several categories (ie: "Mage", "Spell", "Blood Mage"), etc..

It's also a good idea to put the top level pages on the left menu, so that people don't have to go all the way back to the first page.

Edit: Also, there's not enough links between the pages. Some pages are dead-ends, with no links in the content of the article, which is quite against the spirit of a wiki :-)

Modifié par Furism, 19 octobre 2009 - 09:28 .


#35
SilverApollo

SilverApollo
  • Members
  • 39 messages
Wiki updates are always appreciated :3

#36
Lucy Glitter

Lucy Glitter
  • Members
  • 4 996 messages
 Some new spells upsies :)

#37
Arttis

Arttis
  • Members
  • 4 098 messages
Any new specialization?

#38
Mirander

Mirander
  • Members
  • 127 messages
This week, nope, no new specializations. We got two new spells, and a brief description of poison-making.

#39
Jab0r

Jab0r
  • Members
  • 406 messages
No specs, I'm afraid. Just Death Cloud, Inferno, and the poison-making skill.

#40
Jorithel Ravencrest

Jorithel Ravencrest
  • Members
  • 44 messages
**cough** specialization details still missing** cough

#41
sadromeo1

sadromeo1
  • Members
  • 72 messages
Nice wiki Chris!



I am sure there is going to be a plethora of information about this game shortly but it is always great to have as many places and information as possible especially with the dept of this game.

#42
X2-Elijah

X2-Elijah
  • Members
  • 629 messages
Wait - so the grand poison-making update is one sentence and 2 screenshots? Jeesh, what a rip-off.

#43
Mirander

Mirander
  • Members
  • 127 messages
So... are we not getting an update this week?

#44
KillTheLastRomantic

KillTheLastRomantic
  • Members
  • 733 messages

Arcite550 wrote...

Dev, can I date your avatar? lol



Its hotter than reality by far.

#45
boe2

boe2
  • Members
  • 80 messages
Especially the character specialisations + skills are horribly lacking right now, while the game is about to be released. Can we please get an update soon?

#46
Wissenschaft

Wissenschaft
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages
A lot of the specialisations + skills seem to have been filled in. And the companions now list their starting talents.

#47
Kelnaz

Kelnaz
  • Members
  • 19 messages
Cool, thanks a lot. Been trying to find more in depth details about this game. I haven't been this excited for a game in a long time.

#48
Ub3r_

Ub3r_
  • Members
  • 159 messages
can we please get a MASSIVLY in depth section for Tactics?

#49
apocalypsefu

apocalypsefu
  • Members
  • 3 messages
Are you guys going to unlock the wiki so people can edit it and contribute? Because it is so protected that you can't even edit your own user page.

#50
Bilhelm

Bilhelm
  • Members
  • 14 messages
I'd like to see this online Tome include everything in the Codex that's in the game. Would be nice to review things, etc. during downtime at work.