Aller au contenu

Photo

I think there needs to be resistance against Indoc Theory


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
367 réponses à ce sujet

#301
Vromrig

Vromrig
  • Members
  • 621 messages

wheelierdan wrote...

one of the reasons the theory is somewhat unsettling is its sort of like the end of BSG when it went all religious, i view mass effect as a science game for rational people, and to see this strange almost religion pop up in the fervent belief of this whole thing, and the way its defended.


Disingenuous post.  Not stating of true feeling.  Projecting of real liffe prejudices onto disagreement.

#302
Cyan-Glow

Cyan-Glow
  • Members
  • 128 messages
To put it another way:

If you support IT: It's like you've bought an unfinished product
If you oppose IT It's like you bought a poorly written unfinished product.

Take your pics and grab a banner!

#303
Hunter_Wolf

Hunter_Wolf
  • Members
  • 670 messages

beank wrote...
The best thing to do against the theory would be to question it and find counter points to support another theory.


I actually encourage disagreements in that regard. What I don't like seeing are people being openly against something out of personal bias. That means no matter what one says to the other, they've already made up their mind. So then it begs the question, why have the argument at all if you aren't willing to be critiqued? 

There is however a limit to how far theorycrafting should go because that can also lead to a scene of disappointment. But hey, to each their own!

Modifié par Hunter_Wolf, 25 mars 2012 - 05:11 .


#304
SamFlagg

SamFlagg
  • Members
  • 688 messages

beank wrote...

@Vromrig....

When i read your post in my head I hear morridin's voice. I like that.

@The Thread In General....

Without a rival theroy, then IT (IDT, Indoc Theroy, whatever its called)  is just to at giving explinations to things that seem to lack them.

The best thing to do against the theory would be to question it and find counter points to support another theory.


social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/10349127/1#10349763

Like the link above, I believe the problem all alternatives have is they have to retcon.  (Which I find preferable to indoc, but I'll take either)

Outside of indoctrination I'm not sure anyone has come up with a good way to start the game again when Shepard wakes up.  (From a narrative perspective)

I think one of the reasons there is a lot of resistance to retconning is there are a lot of people still really really really invested in the idea that Bioware didn't fumble the football.

#305
beank

beank
  • Members
  • 170 messages
@Hunter_Wolf....

I agree. I think part of the problem is that the discussion is based out of a forum run by the makers of the game. This leads to bias both against (people that are just angry at bioware) and for (people that just love bioware). Both the for and against people seem to have the majority of the voices in the threads.

@SamFlagg....

Thanks for the link. I will read it when I get the chance.

#306
noobcannon

noobcannon
  • Members
  • 1 654 messages

BlankPage wrote...

Why.. Resist? I mean, if it's true then it is true. If it is not, then it is not. Simple! No need to flame those who believe it is true or vice versa. Though disagreeing with them is a different matter, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

"Resistance" is an odd word to use.


favorite post on bsn

#307
Guest_Dominus Solanum_*

Guest_Dominus Solanum_*
  • Guests

Vromrig wrote...

wheelierdan wrote...

one of the reasons the theory is somewhat unsettling is its sort of like the end of BSG when it went all religious, i view mass effect as a science game for rational people, and to see this strange almost religion pop up in the fervent belief of this whole thing, and the way its defended.


Disingenuous post.  Not stating of true feeling.  Projecting of real liffe prejudices onto disagreement.


Glad I'm not the only one who saw a strange similarity with the feverish belief of the indoc theory to other things. 

#308
wheelierdan

wheelierdan
  • Members
  • 644 messages
a funny side note to lighten the mood, amazon offered me mass effect 1 to buy in my email today...

#309
Penitent

Penitent
  • Members
  • 118 messages

SamFlagg wrote...

Outside of indoctrination I'm not sure anyone has come up with a good way to start the game again when Shepard wakes up.  (From a narrative perspective)

You mean like a Reaper beam sending him flying and knocking the tar out of him, similar to what occurs at the very beginning of the game?

Oh, silly me, that explanation isn't completely ridiculous. As such it simply won't do for the IT proponents.

#310
TheProfessor234

TheProfessor234
  • Members
  • 598 messages
I agree that multiple theories are better than one but I don't think there's enough info for more than one.

#311
wheelierdan

wheelierdan
  • Members
  • 644 messages
i forgot about that time in the tutorial level, youre right. also wasnt it noticed that the beam hits in front of you at the end not on you... i still dont buy the end that way but just narrowing it to that, it works

#312
shamE12

shamE12
  • Members
  • 131 messages

Cyan-Glow wrote...

To put it another way:

If you support IT: It's like you've bought an unfinished product
If you oppose IT It's like you bought a poorly written unfinished product.

Take your pics and grab a banner!


/thread with a chainsaw

#313
Kylie Nightbreeze

Kylie Nightbreeze
  • Members
  • 52 messages

noobcannon wrote...

Hunter_Wolf wrote...

noobcannon wrote...
would it still bother you if it is free? i think i'd only be pissed if they charged me for it.


I'll be brutally honest and say I'd still be a bit pissed. Because lets think about that, if there wasn't outrage... whose to say they wouldn't try to charge us for it?


if it was anyone other than EA, there's be no doubt in my mind that it would be free. but this is EA. i have a feeling it will be loaded with content, Indoctrination theory clarification, more endgame content/levels/missions/dialouge etc, multiplayer characters, maps, weapons, maybe even bonus xp or something as equally meaningless, and then they will use that to justify charging us for it. 

i just think with how mad the fanbase is right now, they'd be incredibly foolish to charge us for it.

Of course they are going to charge for it: it's work on their part, and I agree with them they have the right to charge for it. If you went to work and your boss said you weren't going to be paid for your work today how mad would you be? It is a job for these guys to give us games like this, so I say more power to them in the pay or free department.

#314
Kylie Nightbreeze

Kylie Nightbreeze
  • Members
  • 52 messages

noobcannon wrote...

Kylie Nightbreeze wrote...

Dreogan wrote...

Please answer one thing: With what is currently in the game, with the way it is told, why is this theory relevant?

There isn't a single thing to prove. People just getting little pieces of information here and there, like the Arrival DLC and saying that Shep was indoct because of it, and they expect everyone to buy it as fact. Sorry but no dice there. As stated rapid Indoc which is what that would have been would have killed Shep in a few weeks. ME3 Last for atleast half a year. So....


 

List to the Reaper segmant again. "Slow paitent indoctronation can last for months or years... Rapid indoctroantion can happen, but only last for days or weeks." This notion that ME3 was only a couple of days is bull. First of all I have heard of no mass war like this taking only a couple of day or hours. Second how long was Ash in hospital a couple of hours I donn't think so. In the beginging of the game it is stated that Shep has been held up for over a month. Listent to what Dr. Chakwas says when you get her back on board. "I know it has only been 6 months (or whatever she says, but I know it is months)..." this was about the brandy thing. So rapid not slow because Shep was not near a reaper for all of that time, so Indoc dead in the water... sigh.

#315
Nauks

Nauks
  • Members
  • 806 messages
This whole thread does more to support indoc theory than anything >:)

#316
Skypain

Skypain
  • Members
  • 11 messages
Nice theory but it doesnt give answer like:

First how come none of youre comp never notice any sign of you being indoc, i mean garrus and tali was with you from ME1 to 3. If anyone one would have notice it, they be the first.

Second, on Thessia that prothean VI seems to be able to detect indoc organics. How come it doesnt detect that youre indoc or why would it even help you if you are indoc?

Third, why indoc Shepard? Hacket or Anderson would be a better candidates sinds their the human military leaders.

Fourth, at the start of ME2 Shepard been spaced/dead. If Shepard been indoc in ME1 how does the indoc pass over while you were dead and then been rebuild by Cerberus.

#317
Iwillbeback

Iwillbeback
  • Members
  • 1 902 messages

Kylie Nightbreeze wrote...

But the Indoc theory creates even more holes than it solves, so it is no better.



No it doesn't.

#318
Iwillbeback

Iwillbeback
  • Members
  • 1 902 messages
[quote]Skypain wrote...

Nice theory but it doesnt give answer like:

First how come none of youre comp never notice any sign of you being indoc, i mean garrus and tali was with you from ME1 to 3. If anyone one would have notice it, they be the first. [/quote]


There was signs indoctrination in Mass effect(The dreams and the little boy at the start: He was never real)
Shepard only got indoctrinated in Arrival


[quote]

Second, on Thessia that prothean VI seems to be able to detect indoc organics. How come it doesnt detect that youre indoc or why would it even help you if you are indoc?

[/quote]

Protheans VI's can't detect lightly indoctrinated beings, hence they were betrayed from the inside during their war.

[quote]
Third, why indoc Shepard? Hacket or Anderson would be a better candidates sinds their the human military leaders.

[/quote]

Shepard was at Arrival, not them.


[quote]

Fourth, at the start of ME2 Shepard been spaced/dead. If Shepard been indoc in ME1 how does the indoc pass over while you were dead and then been rebuild by Cerberus.[/quote]
[/quote]

He was indoctrinated in Arrival

Modifié par Iwillbeback, 25 mars 2012 - 12:25 .


#319
evisneffo

evisneffo
  • Members
  • 753 messages

Cyan-Glow wrote...

To put it another way:

If you support IT: It's like you've bought an unfinished product
If you oppose IT It's like you bought a poorly written unfinished product.

Take your pics and grab a banner!


See this.

I don't think this has to be a "resistance". I may not like the theory but I accept that with so much support for it there's a chance that if BioWare does anything with the ending this is what they'll run with. Until then, I'll continue respectfully disagreeing with it.

Modifié par evisneffo, 25 mars 2012 - 12:37 .


#320
Skypain

Skypain
  • Members
  • 11 messages
[quote]Iwillbeback wrote...

[quote]Skypain wrote...

Nice theory but it doesnt give answer like:

First how come none of youre comp never notice any sign of you being indoc, i mean garrus and tali was with you from ME1 to 3. If anyone one would have notice it, they be the first. [/quote]


There was signs indoctrination in Mass effect(The dreams and the little boy at the start: He was never real)
Shepard only got indoctrinated in Arrival


[quote]

Second, on Thessia that prothean VI seems to be able to detect indoc organics. How come it doesnt detect that youre indoc or why would it even help you if you are indoc?

[/quote]

Protheans VI's can't detect lightly indoctrinated beings, hence they were betrayed from the inside during their war.

[quote]
Third, why indoc Shepard? Hacket or Anderson would be a better candidates sinds their the human military leaders.

[/quote]

Shepard was at Arrival, not them.


[quote]

Fourth, at the start of ME2 Shepard been spaced/dead. If Shepard been indoc in ME1 how does the indoc pass over while you were dead and then been rebuild by Cerberus.[/quote]
[/quote]

He was indoctrinated in Arrival

[/quote]

My Shepard was never was at the Arriva, i never took part on that mission (dont have the DLC). In the GR room it is said that a marine division took out the relay. So how did my Shepard get indoc, space magic :wizard:

We know that soldiers can experience trauma, couldnt shepard been traumatized/stressed by his experience from ME1 to 2? And the reason that he saw a child is becuase it is more dramatic that way? 

#321
Cyan-Glow

Cyan-Glow
  • Members
  • 128 messages
@Skypain:

Yes it's most certainly possible that Shep is traumatized to the point of hallucination, but in the ME universe there is a more convenient reason for it; no not space magic, but Indoctrination.

It's assumed that Shepard is indoctrinated through multiple exposures to reaper technology. It's not 1 defining event; more like slow corruption over time. After all, he has been around and inside reapers since ME1. Arrival is a great final strike at his independent mind, but not necessary for the IT to make sense.

#322
Kylie Nightbreeze

Kylie Nightbreeze
  • Members
  • 52 messages

Cyan-Glow wrote...

@Skypain:

Yes it's most certainly possible that Shep is traumatized to the point of hallucination, but in the ME universe there is a more convenient reason for it; no not space magic, but Indoctrination.

It's assumed that Shepard is indoctrinated through multiple exposures to reaper technology. It's not 1 defining event; more like slow corruption over time. After all, he has been around and inside reapers since ME1. Arrival is a great final strike at his independent mind, but not necessary for the IT to make sense.

Just because it is an easy  answer does not make it the real one sorry folks, and unless EA and BioWare come out and say ya or nah to the idea I say it is not real cause evidence does not support it.

#323
Kylie Nightbreeze

Kylie Nightbreeze
  • Members
  • 52 messages

Nauks wrote...

This whole thread does more to support indoc theory than anything >:)

Acutually it is getting done what need to be done people who don't like the idea speaking up. This hamster wheel of arguments for IT is just people trying to get the rest of us to believe it, and failing. There is nothing subplot, main plot, or undertone that goes unspoken that says Shep is Indoced.

#324
Iwillbeback

Iwillbeback
  • Members
  • 1 902 messages

Skypain wrote...



My Shepard was never was at the Arriva, i never took part on that mission (dont have the DLC). In the GR room it is said that a marine division took out the relay. So how did my Shepard get indoc, space magic :wizard:

We know that soldiers can experience trauma, couldnt shepard been traumatized/stressed by his experience from ME1 to 2? And the reason that he saw a child is becuase it is more dramatic that way? 


Doesn't matter, it is Canon.
Arrival is why shepard was grounded and held on earth.

#325
Pride Demon

Pride Demon
  • Members
  • 1 342 messages

Iwillbeback wrote...

Skypain wrote...



My Shepard was never was at the Arriva, i never took part on that mission (dont have the DLC). In the GR room it is said that a marine division took out the relay. So how did my Shepard get indoc, space magic :wizard:

We know that soldiers can experience trauma, couldnt shepard been traumatized/stressed by his experience from ME1 to 2? And the reason that he saw a child is becuase it is more dramatic that way? 


Doesn't matter, it is Canon.
Arrival is why shepard was grounded and held on earth.

Arrival happening is, Shepard actually participating in it isn't...
Apparently Hacket sends someone else to deal with the situation, or so they say in the game...

I wonder why Shep is kept on Earth in that case...