majormajormmajor wrote...
Strawmen and ad hominems are the weapons of choice for the pro-ending crowd.
Strawmen and ad hominems are used in some arguments that people make to support the endings. I think the OP made a significant mistake by bringing up the now-inane "vocal minority" agrument, which has been used by both sides with complete lack of any proof supporting such a claim.
But to ignore the fact that such fallacies are employed just as, if not more, frequently by the "anti-ending crowd" is simply self-serving. Broken argument has, and always will be the vehicle for all forum discussions made by those who cannot think rationally for themselves. Simply saying that one person, or several people, on one side of a forum divide did it does not make you correct. It is, in fact, a strawman argument in of itself in some ways.
The broad generalization that you have just made is a discredit to everyone who agrees with you. You should endeavour to be a better representative of the "anti-ending crowd"--heaven knows they need and deserve such representatives with so many of their compatriots running amock in a flame war that will burn this forum to the ground if it isn't stopped soon.





Retour en haut







