Some ending dialogue that was cut
#51
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:08
#52
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:09
Our decisions did matter.
Too bad it all got cut.
#53
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:14
#54
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:15
Modifié par krogstor, 25 mars 2012 - 11:16 .
#55
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:17
#56
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:17
#57
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:18
#58
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:18
#59
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:21
#60
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:21
#61
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:22
Militarized wrote...
So.... we can start blaming EA again? Cause I swear this = EA rushed them.
Yes. I'm sure heads will roll over this one.
#62
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:23
royceclemens wrote...
I have a feeling this is where our "clarification" and "closure" are going to be coming from.
Possibly, and that would be a good thing for many.
But would it not basically be a DLC that completes the game? Not add really adding "clarification' and "closure"?
And charging for such a DLC may be a bad move causing a LOT of backlash with this info.
Modifié par jess05, 25 mars 2012 - 11:24 .
#63
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:27
jess05 wrote...
royceclemens wrote...
I have a feeling this is where our "clarification" and "closure" are going to be coming from.
Possibly, and that would be a good thing for many.
But would it not basically be a DLC that completes the game? Not add really adding "clarification' and "closure"?
And charging for such a DLC may be a bad move causing a LOT of backlash with this info.
There will be ****ing war if they charge for this DLC.
#64
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:30
leonia42 wrote...
If this was a DVD, we'd at least get to "view deleted scenes".
Oh what could have been..
With cute little pencil drawouts.
#65
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:31
they gave ultimatum to BioWare that they would not give them extra production fund if the game were not released at March 2012 so they financial report for Q1 wouldn't look so bad
#66
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:31
Mesina2 wrote...
Mass Effect 3 should have been delayed until holiday 2012.
And to think it was originally planned to be released in holiday 2011?
This! I would of been upset at having to wait longer but it would have been worth it. SO WORTH IT
#67
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:32
jess05 wrote...
royceclemens wrote...
I have a feeling this is where our "clarification" and "closure" are going to be coming from.
Possibly, and that would be a good thing for many.
But would it not basically be a DLC that completes the game? Not add really adding "clarification' and "closure"?
And charging for such a DLC may be a bad move causing a LOT of backlash with this info.
If they charge for this they can say goodbye to half of their fanbase.
This really is unbelievable though. They had everything they needed to make the Earth mission great, but instead we ended up with a random shooter mission.
#68
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:33
Militarized wrote...
So.... we can start blaming EA again? Cause I swear this = EA rushed them.
No. This is always false. No matter what, someone at BW actually thought they'd be ready. (And really, they should have been with the engine groundwork done by ME2 PS3)
They agreed with EA. They couldn't finish. EA was gracious enough to give them an extension. They still couldn't finish. But you know... Plot can take a backseat to kinect and MP. Makes sense.
Someone at BW is ****ing over that company and it isn't entirely EA.
#69
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:38
#70
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:39
Militarized wrote...
So.... we can start blaming EA again? Cause I swear this = EA rushed them.
You guys ever stopped blaming EA for it? Why would you do that?
shengar wrote...
If I see more cut out content, I prefer BioWare go with "soon" like Valve did. More time to wait but in the end, they bring a masterpiece rather than this rushed piece of something.
Valve can decide it for themselves, BioWare has to obey EA.
Modifié par Dreadcall, 25 mars 2012 - 11:40 .
#71
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:40
GnusmasTHX wrote...
Militarized wrote...
So.... we can start blaming EA again? Cause I swear this = EA rushed them.
No. This is always false. No matter what, someone at BW actually thought they'd be ready. (And really, they should have been with the engine groundwork done by ME2 PS3)
They agreed with EA. They couldn't finish. EA was gracious enough to give them an extension. They still couldn't finish. But you know... Plot can take a backseat to kinect and MP. Makes sense.
Someone at BW is ****ing over that company and it isn't entirely EA.
Amen.
#72
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:40
shengar wrote...
If I see more cut out content, I prefer BioWare go with "soon" like Valve did. More time to wait but in the end, they bring a masterpiece rather than this rushed piece of something.
I wouldn't. They can use the word "soon" but it can't mean what Valve thinks it means. Which is that they don't even work on it, and tell people it's coming anyway.
#73
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:40
They already did that with the "From Ashes" DLC..krogstor wrote...
I swear to god BW, if you charge us for content that should've been in the game, there will be lawsuits. And yes, we can get a nice class action going over something like this.
#74
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:41
BioWare shouldn't think reimplementing these few extra dialogues will get them off the hook for space magic.
#75
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 11:42
Lmaoboat wrote...
Oh man, they cut out the Geth coming to your aid?
Damn, even just reading the dialogue with the Geth prime makes it sounds totally awesome.
Why BioWare? Why cut this?





Retour en haut






