Dragoonlordz wrote...
Other way around thanks. In fact your very reply proves this to be the case being you are bashing the other side and giving a retarded answer.
I don't disagree that there are some nasty people out there calling themselves Retakers who are doing nothing but bashing and trolling. No one has ever denied that.
I think the guys point was that while most people on the Retake side of things have been civil and could put out their arguements in a logical and friendly manner, he has yet to find a pro-ender who has been able to coherently explain why they liked the ending without hand waving.
Most of the pro-enders seem to resort to "The ending! Its Artistic! If you don't get that then you are a big stupidhead!"
Even you, someone whom I know to be a reasonable and forthright person, couldn't and hasn't explained the ending adequately. IMO.
I read your post on the matter and even though it was civil & thoughtful, it read to me like you were simply handwaving the problem away because you love Mass Effect and want to love Mass Effect 3, and don't want the end to ruin the whole thing for you.
Which is just fine. You are entitled to your opinion, and I really AM glad that you like the ending. I do wish that I did, but alas being an amateur writer I find the plot holes, and sudden change of narrative style to be very jarring to the point of it being ruinous of the entire plot line of the entire trilogy.
The only thing that gets me about your criticism of the Retakers movement is that you slagged off Dragon Age 2 for many of the same things that you enjoy/handwave away in Mass Effect 3. And that I just can not understand or agree with.
I mean Dragon Age 2's ending sucked because it lacked choice and consequence. But at least it made sense within the context of the game and the universe even if it did completely suck.