I absolutly
hate it when people compare games to movies..
If people see movies and dislike the ending they do (
as Spoony does) rant about it, then move on..because people watch movies because of the story, and the ending is part of the story.
In games like Borderlands, the story is less important..no one really cares if the ending sucked, they rant about it and move on.
Mass Effect is a
game where story is just as important as the rest of the game.
One of the best things about Mass Effect is how you can actually make decisions that alter the story (
not alot of Sci-Fi movies that can do that)..and the fun thing about making descions (big and small) is seeing their consequences.
At the end of Mass Effect 3 you can only guess what the consequences where..
What if Mass Effect ended with every question answerd, but gave a subtle hint at the end that Shepard was in fact syntethic.
that - unable to save Shepards life - Cerberus desided to create an A.I that was nearly impossible to distinguish from the real Shepard.
That would leave
one thing open to interpretation..some fans beliving that it would be impossible because of this and that, and others saying it makes sense.
(
yes, it might remind you of something)
Instead we have a theory that is supposed to explain every flaw with the ending.
No good sci-fi movie ever did that..they only leave one thing up for interpretation.
tl;dr I disagree with Spoony about comparing Mass Effect to Sci-Fi movies.