InvincibleHero wrote...
It tried to make a factual argumen,t but failed to be persuasive because it was all based on subjective opinion. Each and every plot hole can be closed by BW if they choose to address them. Just because an end user assumes a plot hole exists that doesn't make it fact.
This is possibly the dumbest thing I've read on these forums.
Plot holes aren't subjective. They are facts.
Looke at the words. Plot---Hole
A hole in the plot.
Nobody "assumes" there is a plot hole somewhere. A plot hole is brought about because something happens in the story that goes against what has alread been established by the rest of the story.
If the KKK suddenly decided they love black people, support the black panthers and NAACP, and want to help restore the ghettos to nice neghborhoods. The actions of the KKK have shown that this is completely opposite of their pre-stated goals and actions and if they suddenly wake up one day any not a single soul in the world knows or understands why then we have a plot hole.
The same goes for Mass Effect 3.
Just one example of a plot hole.
In Mass Effect 2, Shepard Dies, why? Because he has to go from a lower deck on the Normandy, all the way to the cockpit, pull Joker from a chair and shove him in an escape pod all because Joker doesn't want to give up. If that is the case, then why in the hell is he running from the fight in the final cutscene? Some people say, well he romanced EDI blah blah blah. Hey, I shut that idea down in my playthrough yet in the end he is still running from the battle.
This isn't the only plothole in the game either, this is just an example of one of many plotholes, which I feel this statement needs to be repeated, that aren't subjective.





Retour en haut





