359 réponses à ce sujet

[Kayawyn4]

I would have gladly waited until November 2013 if they said they needed that long.

[lachdelkar]

Yes I would have waited. can you imagine if the game had come out in the Holiday 2011 like originally intended?
I want this game to be a success for Bioware, so I hope they take their time and implement better and proper single-player DLC...not just MP packs

[UltmtBiz]

Yes

[KazarianGarnet09]

I would have gladly waited another year if it meant getting better content. Better endings, better side quests instead of just scanning and launching a probe ect. If waiting a little bit longer would've given me a game where my choices mattered, yes. I would have waited.

To those saying "They spent nine years on this series." I say, What's one more year?

[NvVanity]

I would have waited longer but i'm satisfied with the overall content of the game minus the ending.

[TexasToast712]

 Nope. WAAAAAy too many games coming out for me in November I'm going to be busy enough as is. 

Halo 4
AC3
Resident Evil 6
Probably the rumored CoD.

[Shibibiba]

I absolutely would have waited longer if it meant having at least an ending that gave a better resolution to the game.

[Hydralysk]

I waited 10 years for starcraft 2, I would've waited more than a couple months for an compelling ending to ME3.

[Egonne]

Yes

[Falcon509]

Yes, I would've waited.

[ahandsomeshark]

Naltair wrote...

Because money and time are infinite quantities and BioWare is just a bunch of hippies who care nothing about making money and feeding their workers/families.

They spent nine years on this game series people.

If they care about making money then brand loyalty should probably be high on their concern lists. And you build brand loyalty by consistently delivering to fan expectation, or at least to what you claim you're going to deliver. The amount of money they stand to lose if a significant number of fans stop pre-ordering or start buying their future games used is larger than the amount of money they'd lose with a few more months of development.

[Holoe4]

indeed

[Abirn]

Naltair wrote...

Because money and time are infinite quantities and BioWare is just a bunch of hippies who care nothing about making money and feeding their workers/families.

They spent nine years on this game series people.

Blizzard and Valve disprove your point.

[KevShep]

Yes!

[sizuka2]

Hell yes.

There's a reason that Blizzard and Valve go by a 'when it's done' schedule, and that's the reason their reputations are gold.

Modifié par sizuka2, 26 mars 2012 - 01:47 .

[Asharad Hett]

Yes, I would wait. I'm still waiting for Valve to release HL3.

[magnutz06]

Without a doubt

[nwj94]

I would have waited a year if it meant a better game.

[pfellahX]

I would have been OK with some amount of waiting... not sure about a whole extra year. Then again, using perfect 20/20 hindsight, if waiting until November meant we'd get a game that matched the pre-release hype... absolutely.

[KrazyKiko]

Y.e.s.

[FS3D]

 Would I wait until November for a properly-developed product that included a properly-thought-out story and a suitable series of endings that could have the promised and advertised wildly-diverging outcomes to the story?

Yes.

Would I be frustrated at waiting longer?

Yes, but that's an acceptable compromise compared to what we got.

Would BioWare and/or EA have actually put release date back 6 months in order to properly flesh out the story?

Hell no. They would lose sales, and as we all know, EA is all about the mighty dollar.

[Yttrian]

I knew it was being rushed, but I never realised just how much.

The RPG elements are laughably trimmed, the endings had little to no pier review, and the lauded mulitplayer is buggy with non-existent text-coms and a voice coms that doesn't work for most of the player base.

The game was cut down, staff were reassigned, and it feels rushed in so many areas both minor and major that the old Bioware team should be proud; they are now a shining example of what EA does to a company with a geniune interest in selling quality.

[MzAdventure]

I would have waited as long as it took to them to finish with an ending of the same quality as the rest of the game.

[ahandsomeshark]

FS3D wrote...

 Would I wait until November for a properly-developed product that included a properly-thought-out story and a suitable series of endings that could have the promised and advertised wildly-diverging outcomes to the story?

Yes.

Would I be frustrated at waiting longer?

Yes, but that's an acceptable compromise compared to what we got.

Would BioWare and/or EA have actually put release date back 6 months in order to properly flesh out the story?

Hell no. They would lose sales, and as we all know, EA is all about the mighty dollar.

Would they actually lose sales if they hadn't set an unrealistic release date in the first place? I mean if after ME2 they had said ME3 wouldn't be done till 2013-2014 would they actually have lost sales?

[D1ck1e]

Absolutely.