Aller au contenu

Photo

Would you have waited til November for a full game?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
359 réponses à ce sujet

#326
KRAETZNER

KRAETZNER
  • Members
  • 294 messages
I would of waited a decade.

#327
blitzing bear

blitzing bear
  • Members
  • 95 messages
Yes even if this choice was given to me before the game came out

#328
emperoralku

emperoralku
  • Members
  • 122 messages
 I would have waited as long as it took...

#329
Sainta117

Sainta117
  • Members
  • 352 messages
Duh, YES!

#330
FS3D

FS3D
  • Members
  • 436 messages

ahandsomeshark wrote...

FS3D wrote...

 Would I wait until November for a properly-developed product that included a properly-thought-out story and a suitable series of endings that could have the promised and advertised wildly-diverging outcomes to the story?

Yes.

Would I be frustrated at waiting longer?

Yes, but that's an acceptable compromise compared to what we got.

Would BioWare and/or EA have actually put release date back 6 months in order to properly flesh out the story?

Hell no. They would lose sales, and as we all know, EA is all about the mighty dollar.


Would they actually lose sales if they hadn't set an unrealistic release date in the first place? I mean if after ME2 they had said ME3 wouldn't be done till 2013-2014 would they actually have lost sales?


That's not a question I can really answer. I'm leaning toward the answer being no, they wouldn't have, especially given they are losing sales now due to this business with the endings and lying to their customers.

However, how EA perceives the risk and how the risk actually would have turned out are likely two different things. I suspect that the bean counters at EA considered it an acceptable option on the basis that they believed the vast majority of people would lap up anything they put out in regard to the Mass Effect universe, and they never saw the RetakeME3 movement coming.

#331
Kingthlayer

Kingthlayer
  • Members
  • 1 542 messages

granyte wrote...

as long as it took

sc2 took 10 years but they succeded to not scew anything


Other than only releasing 1/3rd of the game.

But yeah sure I would have waited a bit, always other games coming out.

#332
Oakenshield1

Oakenshield1
  • Members
  • 418 messages
Releasing it in November wouldn't have made any difference because EA would have just made BioWare work on Multi more.

#333
Kingthlayer

Kingthlayer
  • Members
  • 1 542 messages

FS3D wrote...

ahandsomeshark wrote...

FS3D wrote...

 Would I wait until November for a properly-developed product that included a properly-thought-out story and a suitable series of endings that could have the promised and advertised wildly-diverging outcomes to the story?

Yes.

Would I be frustrated at waiting longer?

Yes, but that's an acceptable compromise compared to what we got.

Would BioWare and/or EA have actually put release date back 6 months in order to properly flesh out the story?

Hell no. They would lose sales, and as we all know, EA is all about the mighty dollar.


Would they actually lose sales if they hadn't set an unrealistic release date in the first place? I mean if after ME2 they had said ME3 wouldn't be done till 2013-2014 would they actually have lost sales?


That's not a question I can really answer. I'm leaning toward the answer being no, they wouldn't have, especially given they are losing sales now due to this business with the endings and lying to their customers.

However, how EA perceives the risk and how the risk actually would have turned out are likely two different things. I suspect that the bean counters at EA considered it an acceptable option on the basis that they believed the vast majority of people would lap up anything they put out in regard to the Mass Effect universe, and they never saw the RetakeME3 movement coming.


November will always sell more copies because of Christmas.  It's why Call of Duty does it the same time every year(though people will still buy that even if it came out middle of July)

Kind of surprising BioWare tends to release in the early year now, started with Mass Effect 2, Dragon Age 2 and now Mass Effect 3.

#334
me again 21

me again 21
  • Members
  • 29 messages
My god yes.

There were so many missed opportunities in the way of exploration, side story lines, and in general gameplay that Bioware just missed. They should've extended the deadline for this game and given more of a budget so they could release an amazing ending to a trilogy that deserved better than it got. There was so much potential in this game, and more so in the entire series, and it really just sort of fell flat with this offering.

#335
Sir Leigh Leigh

Sir Leigh Leigh
  • Members
  • 59 messages
Yes, ME3 feels rushed. Would wait another year if it meant I was going to get a satisfactory conclusion.

#336
Greyward

Greyward
  • Members
  • 28 messages
Absolutely. For this and for most any other game. It is rare that a game I'm anticipating will "loose me" because its delayed.

#337
pacientK

pacientK
  • Members
  • 223 messages

scrapmetals wrote...

I would have waited another three years for a better game. I would have waited as long as it took. In fact, if Bioware right now recalled all the games, I'd gladly send them my copy and say, "Take as long as you need. I'm fine waiting. Please, just... make this right."



#338
survivor_686

survivor_686
  • Members
  • 1 543 messages
yup

#339
Generic Name

Generic Name
  • Members
  • 619 messages
I've waited this long for Diablo 3. Waiting until November would have been nothing.

#340
Dracotamer

Dracotamer
  • Members
  • 890 messages
Gladly.

#341
TheMadBlimper

TheMadBlimper
  • Members
  • 336 messages
They could've released multiplayer and took an extra 6 months on single player for all I care.

That would've been preferable to what we have now.

#342
JulienJaden

JulienJaden
  • Members
  • 313 messages
If that meant them implementing everything they promised, I would have waited another YEAR.

You hear that, EA? Make good games!
Oh, I guess you don't know how that's done, so, let me give you a hint:
Give. The producers. Time. TO FINISH. The game.

#343
tanuki

tanuki
  • Members
  • 452 messages
Yes.

#344
Precursor2552

Precursor2552
  • Members
  • 203 messages
I would have waited until March 6th 2013.

#345
Cyph3rX

Cyph3rX
  • Members
  • 240 messages
Yup.

#346
Vhalkyrie

Vhalkyrie
  • Members
  • 1 917 messages
Yeah, I would have waited.

#347
Vorodill

Vorodill
  • Members
  • 156 messages
I would have waited. Still, I didn't feel that the game was incomplete, except the ending, of course.

I mean, come on... no ending? Cause I didn't get any ending.

#348
zennyrpg

zennyrpg
  • Members
  • 122 messages
Of course I would have waited any amount of time.

But EA was not going to give them the time they needed. Its not so much about loosing people by delaying as it is about maximizing sales/development costs. The sad thing is EA probably made the right decision financially- if they would have spent 50% (taken another year) they might have gotten 33% more sales. I don't know the numbers but i do know they sold a ton of copies. How many more sales would they have really gotten if they spent another year? Especially since, as someone already said, they expected audiences to eat anything mass effect up.

#349
Asepsis

Asepsis
  • Members
  • 468 messages
I would have waited years.

#350
ArenCordial

ArenCordial
  • Members
  • 211 messages
I would have waited as long as it took to get it right.