Without question, I would have waited.
Would you have waited til November for a full game?
Débuté par
lyleoffmyspace
, mars 25 2012 08:24
#26
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:29
#27
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:29
as long as it took
sc2 took 10 years but they succeded to not scew anything
sc2 took 10 years but they succeded to not scew anything
#28
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:29
I would have waited, absolutely.
#29
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:29
I believe you'll find that most gamers are willing to wait because we always hear about problems arising out of a rushed schedule.
#30
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:29
Happily.
#31
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:29
Of course.
#32
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
YES and SI.
#33
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
Of course.
Hold the line.
Hold the line.
#34
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
I waited over a decade for Fallout 3 - and that was worth it, hoo boy.
EDIT - oh yeah, and when the ending made no sense, they CHANGED IT AND IT WAS GREAT.
EDIT - oh yeah, and when the ending made no sense, they CHANGED IT AND IT WAS GREAT.
Modifié par Logiwonk, 25 mars 2012 - 08:31 .
#35
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
After watching how it turned out to be. Yes.
#36
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
scrapmetals wrote...
I would have waited another three years for a better game. I would have waited as long as it took. In fact, if Bioware right now recalled all the games, I'd gladly send them my copy and say, "Take as long as you need. I'm fine waiting. Please, just... make this right."
As long as it takes, damnit!
#37
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
Yes, I would wait as long as it took for at least a better ending, I thought the rest of the game was brilliant to be honest.
#38
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
yes
#39
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
Yep i would have waited... would like to say i enjoyed the game very much but simply didn't like the ending! Of course a few things seemed missing like the big role that the Rachni were promised and why didn't i see the geth back on earth and amongst the fleet even though i had made peace with the Quarians!
#40
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
Yup.
#41
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:30
Yes, happily so - I know delays happen, and I'd rather have a masterpiece in Novermber than a turd sandwich in March.
#42
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:31
Grasich wrote...
Most definitely. I was actually rather surprised it came out as soon after ME2 as it did.
The original release date was 2011 wasn't it? That's barely a year after Mass Effect 2.
I'm actually feeling some DA2 syndrome occuring with ME3.
#43
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:31
I'm ready to wait for games as long as it's needed.
#44
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:31
Yes. I would be pissed off but I'd wait.
PS Why are people so annoyed about Dekunna? The gravity would crush us. I'd rather see Kahje or Palaven.
PS Why are people so annoyed about Dekunna? The gravity would crush us. I'd rather see Kahje or Palaven.
#45
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:31
I'd have happily waited another full year or even more, just to get the same quality as in ME1 or 2.
Now, they basically ruined everything. Not just the ending, also the game (in my opinion).. It's just not ME anymore, it's a stupid shooter.
Now, they basically ruined everything. Not just the ending, also the game (in my opinion).. It's just not ME anymore, it's a stupid shooter.
#46
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:31
totally
#47
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:31
granyte wrote...
as long as it took
sc2 took 10 years but they succeded to not scew anything
Terran imba! J/K !
#48
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:32
yes.. I would not have mind waiting.
#49
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:32
If it meant an ending that made sense, a journal system that wasn't a step back and a whole host of little irritances then I'd have waited for as long as it took, I'd still have had it on pre-order and I'd be encouraging others to buy it.
#50
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:32
Yes. I would wait 2 more years for a happy ending with Liara, she's worth it,





Retour en haut




