Definitely. The current game is an abomination.
Would you have waited til November for a full game?
Débuté par
lyleoffmyspace
, mars 25 2012 08:24
Retour en haut
#77
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:40
Jack_Forest
-
- Members
- 170 messages
After reading the script I was ready to wait for another year to allow them to fix that crap.
#78
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:40
WhooMovingTarget
-
- Members
- 333 messages
The REAL important question is:
If you never knew about the endings 'controversy', would you have waited another 6-8 months for Mass Effect 3?
If you never knew about the endings 'controversy', would you have waited another 6-8 months for Mass Effect 3?
#79
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:41
mw2xboxplayer
-
- Members
- 17 messages
WilliamDracul88 wrote...
No, I wanted this ****ty ending all along.
That was a joke.
haha *clap clap*
Would have waited for a better game, and less
.
#80
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:41
Sohlito
-
- Members
- 624 messages
Yep. So long as it meant a more cohesive ending.
#81
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:41
shnellegaming
-
- Members
- 698 messages
Yeah, but its not a matter of can we wait its a matter of do they have enough money to fund 6 more months. Apparently they didn't.
Modifié par shnellegaming, 25 mars 2012 - 08:42 .
#82
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:43
Mighty_BOB_cnc
-
- Members
- 694 messages
November of 2012? Hells yes I would have waited. It's not like I was idly sitting around with nothing to do, twiddling my thumbs and going stir crazy. I have a job and a life and other games that would have kept me busy enough in the meantime even though I would admittedly have been a little bit sad for a slightly longer wait.
#83
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:43
Pkxm
-
- Members
- 432 messages
i would be willing to wait even longer than that. this game needed more time, more thought. they rushed it and blew it
#84
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:44
Mandemon
-
- Members
- 781 messages
If they had come out and said that they need 6 months more to finish the product, I would say yes. I rather have finished and polished product that what we got now...
#85
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:45
Adsinjapan
-
- Members
- 274 messages
I REALLY HOPE BIOWARE READS THIS!
I would have honestly waited for as long as it took for Mass Effect 3 to be what we had experienced in the previous two games. Something that was meant to be so monumental should never be rushed.
Since it's release though, I can't help but feel like it shouldn't have been released when it was,
Those few games that broke the mould of their predecessor, were in a far longer development cycle than ME3 was, so why was the need to bring it out so immediate?? In this day and age, 2 years is nothing in the game making industry. Now not to say that a longer period helps a game (look at Duke Nukem Forever), but from what was left out of the final cut of ME3, it breaks my heart to think that it was rushed.
Lets face it, it WAS rushed. Were we as fans and loyal supporters of Bioware not faithful enough that they thought they had to get the game out a.s.a.p because we would have rioted in the streets otherwise??
We would have all waited as long as we needed to just as long as we were kept in the loop and we were reassured that everything was being scrutinised and painstakingly cared for in the final product.
I don't know, maybe I'm just saying this from my own perspective, 2011 was a very busy year for me after all.
But I think all of us would have been happy or at least understanding if there were delays and the game was going to be held back longer. We would have accepted that kinks needed to be worked out so that we could enjoy the BEST that Bioware had to offer.
i'm certainly not saying that ME3 was bad, I enjoyed a lot of it. But for something the developers claimed was their best game yet, in a lot of ways it just wasn't to the standard we had expected from the previous titles.
It was lacking in so many ways that just a little more patience and care would have resolved.
And now that I've said all this,,,,I need a drink.
I would have honestly waited for as long as it took for Mass Effect 3 to be what we had experienced in the previous two games. Something that was meant to be so monumental should never be rushed.
Since it's release though, I can't help but feel like it shouldn't have been released when it was,
Those few games that broke the mould of their predecessor, were in a far longer development cycle than ME3 was, so why was the need to bring it out so immediate?? In this day and age, 2 years is nothing in the game making industry. Now not to say that a longer period helps a game (look at Duke Nukem Forever), but from what was left out of the final cut of ME3, it breaks my heart to think that it was rushed.
Lets face it, it WAS rushed. Were we as fans and loyal supporters of Bioware not faithful enough that they thought they had to get the game out a.s.a.p because we would have rioted in the streets otherwise??
We would have all waited as long as we needed to just as long as we were kept in the loop and we were reassured that everything was being scrutinised and painstakingly cared for in the final product.
I don't know, maybe I'm just saying this from my own perspective, 2011 was a very busy year for me after all.
But I think all of us would have been happy or at least understanding if there were delays and the game was going to be held back longer. We would have accepted that kinks needed to be worked out so that we could enjoy the BEST that Bioware had to offer.
i'm certainly not saying that ME3 was bad, I enjoyed a lot of it. But for something the developers claimed was their best game yet, in a lot of ways it just wasn't to the standard we had expected from the previous titles.
It was lacking in so many ways that just a little more patience and care would have resolved.
And now that I've said all this,,,,I need a drink.
Modifié par Adsinjapan, 25 mars 2012 - 08:58 .
#86
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:45
jimfixedit
-
- Members
- 41 messages
Jesusland wrote...
Yes, we wait another 6 months to a year, meanwhile EA is paying all those millions of dollars in salaries and overhead. Why would they do that? Make an argument for it, but from a business stand point.
I'd say the business case would be that they don't spend those millions anyway trying to fix a rushed release.
Bad press, all the fallout, loss of credibility etc. This is probably going to cost them twice as much in the long run as it would have cost doing it right first time.
#87
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:46
Gregg_Spradling
-
- Members
- 28 messages
i would have waited, but I don't think they would have put any more effort into SP. I think they are looking forward to Mass Effect becoming another Gears of War or COD type thing where you play the SP once or twice on some prequal campaign and then everyone plays MP and buys Spactre Packs for cash and new MP maps as DLC.
#88
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:46
Reaperpoo
-
- Members
- 251 messages
Grasich wrote...
Most definitely. I was actually rather surprised it came out as soon after ME2 as it did.
Yep, that's what I thought.
I would have waited, no doubt.
#89
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:46
Asharhia
-
- Members
- 40 messages
scrapmetals wrote...
I would have waited another three years for a better game. I would have waited as long as it took. In fact, if Bioware right now recalled all the games, I'd gladly send them my copy and say, "Take as long as you need. I'm fine waiting. Please, just... make this right."
#90
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:46
Thornne
-
- Members
- 831 messages
Why would you not want to wait to play a finished game? It's not like playing an unfinished game 6-12 months earlier makes for a better game ...
#91
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:46
Fawx9
-
- Members
- 1 134 messages
Been waiting for D3.
Another 6 months would have felt like nothing.
Another 6 months would have felt like nothing.
#93
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:46
BellPeppers&Beef023
-
- Members
- 709 messages
had they made the announcement to delay at the end of February or something it would have stung
but in retrospect, absolutely.
but in retrospect, absolutely.
#94
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:47
thetawaves90
-
- Members
- 151 messages
Yes indeed. Loved the game, would love to see what it would have been without a deadline.
#95
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:47
Icinix
-
- Members
- 8 188 messages
November? In 2020?
Yes. Yes I would have.
Yes. Yes I would have.
#96
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:48
ShoeHornOPlenty
-
- Members
- 9 messages
Considering how DA2 was rushed as well and we saw the community's reaction to that game you would have thought they would have taken their sweet time so they didn't have to come up with the abortion of an ending that ME3 had.
#97
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:48
thompsonaf
-
- Members
- 262 messages
Absolutely! They could of expanded so much, more hub worlds, a real trial, a longer final mission, actual choice based endings, etc.. They just rushed it and it shows.
#98
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:48
Nykara
-
- Members
- 1 929 messages
lyleoffmyspace wrote...
In retrospect, so much of the game feels unfinished.
Earth was rubbish. No trial.
So many of the missions were just scanning - point in case - the mission to get Elcor War Assets, I thought it would be a proper mission on the Elcor homeworld. It wasn't, all we got was some scanning. It was so much wasted potential.
Hardly any conversations with squadmates - what we had was good, but there wasn't much volume.
No use of ME2 squadmates - we should have had some as temporary squadmates
No hub worlds.
Earth Part 2 was also rubbish. I thought it'd be a suicide mission type thing but on a galactic scale. It wasn't just some battles on a horribly designed and textured "London"
And then the ending.
Would you preferred to have waited another 6 months to get more features, or have got it in March, and got what we did?
Yes. Waiting is always preferable if it means a better, more polished game and story.
#100
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:49
Kirival
-
- Members
- 85 messages
everyone gives Blizzard so much flak for taking forever to get their games out, but I've never bought one of their games and felt cheated, let down, or disappointed. they deliver on what they say theyre going to do and if it takes another year then people have to wait but the final product is always spectacular. to prove the point name one failed game by blizzard
