Waiting for complete well done game is nothing compared to a unfinished one. So yes i would´ve waited
Would you have waited til November for a full game?
Débuté par
lyleoffmyspace
, mars 25 2012 08:24
Retour en haut
#103
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:51
mghjr6
-
- Members
- 252 messages
It wouldn't have even stung me, personally. I would have figured that if they needed more time to be the best they could make it, so be it.
#104
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:51
Adsinjapan
-
- Members
- 274 messages
Grasich wrote...
Most definitely. I was actually rather surprised it came out as soon after ME2 as it did.
This.
It shocked even me, and you know what. That short development cycle shows. ME3 is unfinished.
I'm sure some may argue that ME3 was in development during ME2, but a hiatus in between games would have given time to recouperate and come at the final game from different angles.
Instead we get this...
#107
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:52
Abirn
-
- Members
- 936 messages
Wolfsong27 wrote...
Waited, obviously.
But chances are the release was rushed because they needed a boom in profit, perhaps even to fund polishing the game and creating DLC.
Funny how valve and blizzard (the top two game developers in history) don't have a problem with delaying gams as long as it takes to get them fully complete. Why is it Bioware has to rush then?
If you want to consider it a work of art then you don't rush it to meet artificial deadlines.
#108
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:52
Vesper12
-
- Members
- 13 messages
ME3 was definitely rushed.
So yes, Bioware could have done way better with more time.
So yes, Bioware could have done way better with more time.
#110
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:53
Grasich
-
- Members
- 1 671 messages
Kirival wrote...
everyone gives Blizzard so much flak for taking forever to get their games out, but I've never bought one of their games and felt cheated, let down, or disappointed. they deliver on what they say theyre going to do and if it takes another year then people have to wait but the final product is always spectacular. to prove the point name one failed game by blizzard
I totally agree. I would say this is one of Blizzard's strong suites. They take as much time as they need to get a really great, finished, polished game out. It takes them forever to finish, but the final product is something people will love for years and years afterwards.
Hell, I still regularly do Diablo 2 LAN parties.
#111
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:53
Hexxys
-
- Members
- 248 messages
Abirn wrote...
Wolfsong27 wrote...
Waited, obviously.
But chances are the release was rushed because they needed a boom in profit, perhaps even to fund polishing the game and creating DLC.
Funny how valve and blizzard (the top two game developers in history) don't have a problem with delaying gams as long as it takes to get them fully complete. Why is it Bioware has to rush then?
They're owned by EA, that's why lol.
Neither Valve nor Blizzard have that problem.
Modifié par Hexxys, 25 mars 2012 - 08:55 .
#113
Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:54
Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
-
- Guests
I'd wait, but it better be out by December 20th.
#117
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:55
Pepitobenito
-
- Members
- 73 messages
I don't think anyone would be complaining about the Earth segment if the ending wasn't so horrible. Yeah, it's not up to the level of quality of the other major mission arcs, but it's far from bad.
My answer to the question though? I gladly would have waited.
My answer to the question though? I gladly would have waited.
Modifié par Pepitobenito, 25 mars 2012 - 08:55 .
#118
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:55
Ravennus
-
- Members
- 414 messages
Yes, but only in retrospect now that I've played the game.
If they delayed the game for another 6 months before I had a chance to witness the shameful atrocity of an ending I would have probably been a bit peeved because I didn't know what the issue was. I wouldn't have raged online, but I would have been disappointed.
Then again, it comes back to an open dialogue between developers and consumers.
If they delayed the game for another 6 months before I had a chance to witness the shameful atrocity of an ending I would have probably been a bit peeved because I didn't know what the issue was. I wouldn't have raged online, but I would have been disappointed.
Then again, it comes back to an open dialogue between developers and consumers.
#119
Guest_FUS ROH DAH FTW_*
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:55
Guest_FUS ROH DAH FTW_*
Guest_FUS ROH DAH FTW_*
-
- Guests
Bioware should do a Blizzard and put it out 10 years later atleast it will be good and polished.
#122
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:56
BWGungan
-
- Members
- 473 messages
Yes. I had plenty of other stuff to keep me busy. I'm not even half way through Skyrim yet but I interrupted that play through for ME3. Now I regret it. I would have been fine if it had come later rather than sooner.
#123
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:56
lyleoffmyspace
-
- Members
- 499 messages
Kirival wrote...
everyone gives Blizzard so much flak for taking forever to get their games out, but I've never bought one of their games and felt cheated, let down, or disappointed. they deliver on what they say theyre going to do and if it takes another year then people have to wait but the final product is always spectacular. to prove the point name one failed game by blizzard
Same with Valve.
I have NEVER EVER felt disappointed by a Valve product.
They couldn't cope with the episodic production schedule, so they just quit it. I respect that.
#124
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:56
Nighthunteer
-
- Members
- 285 messages
KillTheWiseOne wrote...
yes, yes, a thousand times yes.
#125
Posté 25 mars 2012 - 08:56
nexesotaku
-
- Members
- 62 messages
I honestly expected a 2013 release date when I beat 2. I still feel it should have been then.
