"It's really the work of a super minority. The game has sold millions of copies *goes into leading speculation*" - hilarious. Can people and a website have negative credibility, or is zero the lowest credibility can go?
Riddle me this: 1.3 million in pre-orders according to
www.vgchartz.com/preorders/40972/USA/ This stat can never be used to say "Millions of people bought the game therefore it is good." because a pre-order is based on advertising and company inspired hype. Those 1.3 million people, including me, did not get to play through the entire product before making a purchase decision.
Pre-order numbers are also inflated by 'exclusive pre-order content'. This is a form of bribery. It's been done in politics for generations. Who doesn't have a story from their dad about local politicians offering alcohol to their dad's parents for a vote?
In fact, you really can't take the first 2 weeks of sales as anything but the success or failure of the advertising campaign or brand recognition.
Modifié par Gemini1179, 25 mars 2012 - 09:33 .
), that's bullcrap. If (please) BioWare does this, it certainly isn't a "dangerous precedent". It isn't dangerous in any sense, and it surely isn't precedent, it has been done multiple times already, most famously Bethesda with Fallout 3 and Broken Steel (THAT should be taken as a precedent. When a post-release DLC that alters the ending actually makes the game more enjoyable and even managed to sell more copies... Learn, EA.)
Retour en haut
That's an old vid, C) if it does cost $ it damn well better be a fricking epic ending add on.
