CavScout wrote...
NReed106 wrote...
I haven't supported the Indoc theory, I am merely pointing out that there is evidence for plot holes that you dismiss despite common sense dictating they are plot holes. As I stated before, I think the evidence for the Indoc theory is coincidence of a lost plot line (Indoctration was mentioned as a possiblity in the Final Hours app, but they said it was dismissed).
By all means enlighten us what constitutes a plot hole, I've already read TV tropes I'm sure you are much more qualified to teach people how Out of Character Actions are not plot holes.
Appeals to "common sense".... /facepalm
So called "plot holes" are shown why they're not plot holes. Plot holes are not things you dislike; they're not even things that are unexplained. It needs to work against the plot or be something missing that is "essential to the story's outcome". You haven't shown anything like that. You have a couple of things that are unexplained and some things folks don't like.
- Characters suddenly having knowledge that was never passed to
them, or vice versa; characters not knowing something they knew last
week, or something that anyone in their position must know. - Characters acting completely out of character.
- An event does not logically follow from what has gone before.
- Characters ignoring or avoiding obvious solutions to their problems, provided those solutions are obvious to the characters, and not just the viewers.
- An event occurring that, given other details present in the work, is not possible.
We have a gun with infinite ammo as an event that does not logically follow what has gone before
We have Ghostly trees appearing during the final rush of the conduit are a plot hole despite them not being present on the first rush of the conduit which are two contradicting events
Harby leaving the conduit to let shepard approach is OOC (though not as bad as Joker fleeing the battle) as seen when every Reaper before is focused purely on killing Shepard with their weapons
Retour en haut
