Aller au contenu

Photo

Is this really just bad writing?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
218 réponses à ce sujet

#126
bleachorange

bleachorange
  • Members
  • 654 messages

Arcian wrote...

bleachorange wrote...

Shepard's in a unique position - being brought back from the dead tends to do that to people. I hear they even had to rewrite the Alliance tax code.

Once you bring people back from the dead, is a little anti-reaper mojo such a stretch?

It is not comparable since Shepard did not magically will herself back to life.


I'm just saying Shepard and the Thorian talked mind-to-mind as well. you forget about that?

#127
Morden2261

Morden2261
  • Members
  • 43 messages

yukon fire wrote...

The camera could have pulled back to reveal that it all took place in an autistic kid's snow globe. 



Haha, I'm old enough to actually get that reference. :lol:

#128
Stinkface27

Stinkface27
  • Members
  • 586 messages
I know I sound crazy, I know I sound pathetic and desperate - but I refused to believe that they could have dropped the ball this hard on basically the most important moment in the history of the franchise. How could they?

#129
Hendrik.III

Hendrik.III
  • Members
  • 909 messages
Bad writing? Dunno, it's not the kind of writing that I like, that's for sure.

I don't dig this whole "self-sacrifice for the greater good" kind of ending. A dead hero is still one corpse among many. So an old geezer will be talking about me in the future... yeah. Cool. I'd rather live to see the results of my hard work.

Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate the drama of the protagonist dying, but not in a bat-sh*t crazy way like this. Reminds me of Monty Python's Holy Grail ending - makes as much sense.

#130
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages

Arcian wrote...

Shep did not will herself back to life on her own, billions of credits and two years were invested in rebuilding her. It is not comparable in the slightest. Shepard is a human being, not a god. Stop trying to cover for BioWare, they don't deserve your loyalty anymore.

Pssst!  I'm not loyal to them.  I just think that it's a nice out of they want to take it (they'd have to do DLC, though), and the shark was jumped way back in ME2, so by all means, let's jump it again for the sake of making the end not suck.

By all means, let's all **** out and free BioWare from taking responsibility for their mistakes by offering them a sh!tty "It was all a dream lol"-ending which rapes established lore in the ass and violates almost every single consumer rights.

The POINT of Indoc theory, as I just explained to Lizard, is that "real" ending DLC has to happen for it to work.  And it has to be free for everyone.  It's just one of many ways for Bioware to fix those awful goddamn endings, and the ol' "twas but a dream" card is probably the easiest one to play in order to give themselves a do-over.  There are enough little bits and pieces throughout the story for it to work, so until Bioware does something officially about Endingate, I'm going with "Shepard was indoctrinated and the real final battle is on the way."

We are actually all on the same side here: we thought the endings sucked, too, and we want them fixed.

#131
Mcfly616

Mcfly616
  • Members
  • 8 988 messages
Arcian

Where's your proof? Oh wait you have none....just lots of speculation

Just because we've never seen someone be totally rid of indoctrination, does not mean it isn't possible...

Benezia fought it off long enough to be herself for a few moments....

Shiala from Feros is alive and well, and while she acknowledges still hearing "voices" in her head, shes leading the colony of Zhu's Hope in the fight against the Reapers....


Get your facts straight before you start making definitive statements on what is/isn't possible, like you know a thing or two....

#132
bleachorange

bleachorange
  • Members
  • 654 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...
We are actually all on the same side here: we thought the endings sucked, too, and we want them fixed.


True. I'm just debating the semantics of being able to return from from indoctrination. 'Cause I'm pretty sure I have the better argument here.

Modifié par bleachorange, 26 mars 2012 - 11:21 .


#133
bleachorange

bleachorange
  • Members
  • 654 messages
Bioware's "Solution to THE PROBLEM"

#134
Tyrannosaurus Rex

Tyrannosaurus Rex
  • Members
  • 10 793 messages

Stinkface27 wrote...

I know I sound crazy, I know I sound pathetic and desperate - but I refused to believe that they could have dropped the ball this hard on basically the most important moment in the history of the franchise. How could they?


Why not? Bioware already ****ed up the intro of both ME2 and ME3. The idea that they could screw up the ending is not far-fetched.

Mcfly616 wrote...
Shiala from Feros is alive and well, and
while she acknowledges still hearing "voices" in her head, shes leading
the colony of Zhu's Hope in the fight against the Reapers.....


Because Shiala was infected with the Thorian which drowns out the Reaper voices?

Modifié par Lizardviking, 26 mars 2012 - 11:25 .


#135
Chaota Vos

Chaota Vos
  • Members
  • 588 messages
Honestly, I think if Indoc. Theory turns out to be true, then it's a stroke of genius, keeping up BW's track record of twists and good plot.

Unfortunately, this is gimped by being horridly executed. And leaving out a proper ending

#136
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages

Nimrodell wrote...

Dear Cheez, that's not the reason. The problem with IT is that entire ME3 needs redoing then or it'll carry as many plot holes during the game itself like it has now during those misfortunate 15 minutes at the end. If Shepard was slowly indoctrinated as some suggest, then it would mean s/he is less strong-willed than Paul Grayson (that actually hears Reaper commands and has no control of his body in some parts of the novel), Benezia and Shiala - and I won't go into saying that Shepard is like Amanda Kenson or Rhana Tanoptis or any of those workers we heard during The Arrival. In all these cases though, Reapers were taking active control by comforting their victims into thoughts that the Reapers are actually bringers of greater good - apart from Paul Grayson, there they were more aggressive. Saren and TIM are both lulled by Reapers into thinking they are actually omnipotent, giving them false feeling of knowledge and strength thus deceiving them into doing their exact plan. None of this happens with our Shepards during the game - and in dreams we just hear the voices of those we lost, each dead person, new voice in the next dream... This can be distorted by saying that Reapers were hitting on Shepard's moral 'cause s/he was symbol of hope, but that's really overstretching it. None of the Shepard's crew was reporting Shepard's strange behaviour unlike Reaper IFF science crew reporting dr. Chandana or crew of Amanda Kenson... one would think that at least Liara that was coupled with Shepard would notice something.

As for instant indoctrination... well, that's really overstreching it - there we have another form of sudden space magic, better said, Reaper magic... it's like Sheldon was a Harbinger and did his Bazinga! move. And the strangest thing is, according to all IT versions, Reapers love making movies about our crewmates, relays exploding and old man with his grandson many years after... and even EMS affects their decision if they'll offer us only 'destroy' or other endings - meaning, it's better to have lowest EMS 'cause then that instantly we're freed from Reaper's clutches... So, no, dear Cheez, that's not why Arcian and Mesina2 are saying this. Anyway, I'm just glad seeing you back on boards, it is refreshing indeed. Now let's see if Saphra Deden will emerge from some hellhole, poking us all and telling - you lower beings, I told you ti was all bad writing. lol

These are valid concerns (it's not a perfect solution after all), but in my opinion they pale in comparison to the monstrosity that is the current ending.  Like seriously, I'm willing to accept all those little plotholes to get rid of The Big Ones.

Bioware tends to goof up on foreshadowing anyway.

#137
bleachorange

bleachorange
  • Members
  • 654 messages

Chaota Vos wrote...

Honestly, I think if Indoc. Theory turns out to be true, then it's a stroke of genius, keeping up BW's track record of twists and good plot.

Unfortunately, this is gimped by being horridly executed. And leaving out a proper ending


It WOULD HAVE BEEN genius. But it needed to be immediately followed up with the proper ending, not this cliff-hanger. Now we hate it, even though it could turn out that way, anyway.

#138
Mcfly616

Mcfly616
  • Members
  • 8 988 messages
@Lizardviking

Haha....lots of speculation

#139
Mcfly616

Mcfly616
  • Members
  • 8 988 messages
It says that nowhere in her email

#140
Tyrannosaurus Rex

Tyrannosaurus Rex
  • Members
  • 10 793 messages

Mcfly616 wrote...

@Lizardviking

Haha....lots of speculation


I think it is stated in her email.

#141
Sarevok Synder

Sarevok Synder
  • Members
  • 967 messages
Yes the writing is this bad, there is no grand plan. They actually thought this was a good ending; or they ran out of time/money and believed we were stupid enough to accept this ending. Take your pick.

#142
Jestina

Jestina
  • Members
  • 2 379 messages
Charging the beam on foot is another add to the list of stupid things at the ending. Requisitioning a Mako for that scene would have made more sense. Charging in like they did in ME1, inside an armored vehicle instead of on foot and completely exposed to everything.

#143
bleachorange

bleachorange
  • Members
  • 654 messages
I think EA is trying to *old school reference* 'pull the wool over my eyes'. I'm tired of the quality of Bioware's releases getting lower every game they release. And I think moneygrubbing EA is to blame for most of the issues. Just look at the dev. cycle timeline before and after EA bought Bioware.

#144
Mcfly616

Mcfly616
  • Members
  • 8 988 messages
No...it says that nowhere in Shialas email ....I'm looking at it right now....

#145
Guest_Arcian_*

Guest_Arcian_*
  • Guests

Mcfly616 wrote...

-cut-

Join Date: 2012-03-07
Cute. I've been a Mass Effect fan since 2005 when it was first announced. I did over 30 full playthroughs of ME1, and I've got even more full playthroughs in ME2. I've read all the books twice (except Deception), and I've spent literally days worth reading the codex over and over and over.
During my 7 years as a fan, I have seen nothing that suggests indoctrination isn't an irreversibly brain-damaging process that leaves the victim an unwilling slave. It can be resisted, yes, but only for a very short moment. Death is the only permanent way to end it.
If you had actually paid attention while playing the games, you would have known this as well, but alas, here you are.

#146
Guest_Arcian_*

Guest_Arcian_*
  • Guests

bleachorange wrote...

Arcian wrote...

bleachorange wrote...

Shepard's in a unique position - being brought back from the dead tends to do that to people. I hear they even had to rewrite the Alliance tax code.

Once you bring people back from the dead, is a little anti-reaper mojo such a stretch?

It is not comparable since Shepard did not magically will herself back to life.


I'm just saying Shepard and the Thorian talked mind-to-mind as well. you forget about that?

No they did not, Shiala-CloneNr1 spoke on its behalf.

#147
Mcfly616

Mcfly616
  • Members
  • 8 988 messages
Arcian...

All I really have to say is: SHIALA...you have nothing for me in your prior post

#148
Mcfly616

Mcfly616
  • Members
  • 8 988 messages
idc when you got into Mass Effect....I've been a Bioware fan for over a decade....I got KotOR on Day 1....doesn't mean **** to me lol

Troll....stop trying to say what you believe is "fact" and trying to push it off on all of us

If indoc.theory was intended, Bioware is genius....if it wasn't, it was just a good theory by fans....you have no proof to say either one at this point....

#149
Nimrodell

Nimrodell
  • Members
  • 828 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...

Nimrodell wrote...

Dear Cheez, that's not the reason. The problem with IT is that entire ME3 needs redoing then or it'll carry as many plot holes during the game itself like it has now during those misfortunate 15 minutes at the end. If Shepard was slowly indoctrinated as some suggest, then it would mean s/he is less strong-willed than Paul Grayson (that actually hears Reaper commands and has no control of his body in some parts of the novel), Benezia and Shiala - and I won't go into saying that Shepard is like Amanda Kenson or Rhana Tanoptis or any of those workers we heard during The Arrival. In all these cases though, Reapers were taking active control by comforting their victims into thoughts that the Reapers are actually bringers of greater good - apart from Paul Grayson, there they were more aggressive. Saren and TIM are both lulled by Reapers into thinking they are actually omnipotent, giving them false feeling of knowledge and strength thus deceiving them into doing their exact plan. None of this happens with our Shepards during the game - and in dreams we just hear the voices of those we lost, each dead person, new voice in the next dream... This can be distorted by saying that Reapers were hitting on Shepard's moral 'cause s/he was symbol of hope, but that's really overstretching it. None of the Shepard's crew was reporting Shepard's strange behaviour unlike Reaper IFF science crew reporting dr. Chandana or crew of Amanda Kenson... one would think that at least Liara that was coupled with Shepard would notice something.

As for instant indoctrination... well, that's really overstreching it - there we have another form of sudden space magic, better said, Reaper magic... it's like Sheldon was a Harbinger and did his Bazinga! move. And the strangest thing is, according to all IT versions, Reapers love making movies about our crewmates, relays exploding and old man with his grandson many years after... and even EMS affects their decision if they'll offer us only 'destroy' or other endings - meaning, it's better to have lowest EMS 'cause then that instantly we're freed from Reaper's clutches... So, no, dear Cheez, that's not why Arcian and Mesina2 are saying this. Anyway, I'm just glad seeing you back on boards, it is refreshing indeed. Now let's see if Saphra Deden will emerge from some hellhole, poking us all and telling - you lower beings, I told you ti was all bad writing. lol

These are valid concerns (it's not a perfect solution after all), but in my opinion they pale in comparison to the monstrosity that is the current ending.  Like seriously, I'm willing to accept all those little plotholes to get rid of The Big Ones.

Bioware tends to goof up on foreshadowing anyway.


I know and to be honest, in my wildest dreams I never had even one thought they'll actually ruin their own work this way. But what I find most offensive is their silence and boards being polluted by players rage for two weeks now. Apart from endings, Mass Effect is one of the greatest stories in games and it's really painful to watch everything that's been happening since march 9th, pardon, 6th... memories on great game and good community polluted by the very thing BW claimed won't happen by saying magical sentences on different endings, having a closure and choice that matters.

#150
nomoredruggs

nomoredruggs
  • Members
  • 841 messages
I really can't decide if it's
1. Done on purpose to destroy the franchise
2.Done due to time restrictions
3.Someone thought it was a great idea to go all "intelectual" at the end of the series