translationninja wrote...
Now who is up for organizing a Marauder Shields cake?
After Pax we'll see
Though to make up for him being denied his fix Thomas gets marauder's head all to himself.
Modifié par MatronAdena, 30 mars 2012 - 03:52 .
translationninja wrote...
Now who is up for organizing a Marauder Shields cake?
Modifié par MatronAdena, 30 mars 2012 - 03:52 .
Hmmm, you may be right. Pax is what, a week away? Not opposed to waiting until then to decide on a next move.Geinen wrote...
TheOptimist wrote...
That's actually not a terrible plan...
I think it is, guys. Really. We've made our point loud and clear. To do this just seems so heavy handed at this stage in the game.
Lets wait until PAX and reassess.
Volus Warlord wrote...
This is the most... underhanded... form of protest I've ever seen. Lol.
Modifié par Geinen, 30 mars 2012 - 03:59 .
Geinen wrote...
Volus Warlord wrote...
This is the most... underhanded... form of protest I've ever seen. Lol.
Lol if I had a billboard addressed to me across the street from my work? creepiest thing ever looool.
But considering the cost of it? What possible effect can we get out of it that we havent already communicated?
Its not cost effective at this point.
Darthlawsuit wrote...
We gave you the 3 choices that you gave us in-game. You had only 3 choices. You then chose to do a fourth option that was not part of the choices presented to you. Yet you gave us those choices in-game and told us those 3 choices were all we needed.
Even Bioware does not like being given a choice of only 3 options and chooses another option when the first 3 are not satisfactory. Why is it that Bioware will force the gamer to choose between one of 3 options that are all the same yet will not do the same themselves? Then tell us those 3 endings were great.
Bioware, you really are a hypocrite. We do a gesture of good will and you toss it aside to manipulate it into a PR stunt. Bioware, you have fallen to the Dark side.
Modifié par Fleshdress, 30 mars 2012 - 04:12 .
John Epler wrote...
Darthlawsuit wrote...
We gave you the 3 choices that you gave us in-game. You had only 3 choices. You then chose to do a fourth option that was not part of the choices presented to you. Yet you gave us those choices in-game and told us those 3 choices were all we needed.
Even Bioware does not like being given a choice of only 3 options and chooses another option when the first 3 are not satisfactory. Why is it that Bioware will force the gamer to choose between one of 3 options that are all the same yet will not do the same themselves? Then tell us those 3 endings were great.
Bioware, you really are a hypocrite. We do a gesture of good will and you toss it aside to manipulate it into a PR stunt. Bioware, you have fallen to the Dark side.
One can certainly take a cynical and jaded view of what happened, but, in the end, it seems that this was the best possible resolution.
You guys made sure your message was heard, and disadvantaged children were given a rare opportunity for a treat. I'm always happy to see people choosing to channel their disappointment into creative and positive endeavours, rather than insults and vitriol. It does your group credit.
John Epler wrote...
Darthlawsuit wrote...
We gave you the 3 choices that you gave us in-game. You had only 3 choices. You then chose to do a fourth option that was not part of the choices presented to you. Yet you gave us those choices in-game and told us those 3 choices were all we needed.
Even Bioware does not like being given a choice of only 3 options and chooses another option when the first 3 are not satisfactory. Why is it that Bioware will force the gamer to choose between one of 3 options that are all the same yet will not do the same themselves? Then tell us those 3 endings were great.
Bioware, you really are a hypocrite. We do a gesture of good will and you toss it aside to manipulate it into a PR stunt. Bioware, you have fallen to the Dark side.
One can certainly take a cynical and jaded view of what happened, but, in the end, it seems that this was the best possible resolution.
You guys made sure your message was heard, and disadvantaged children were given a rare opportunity for a treat. I'm always happy to see people choosing to channel their disappointment into creative and positive endeavours, rather than insults and vitriol. It does your group credit.
Modifié par Vesji, 30 mars 2012 - 04:15 .
LoganKey wrote...
(and Thomas Abrams would get the head all to himself)
Vesji wrote...
Hey John! Just... wanted to say hello.
Aehm, how are you doing after that scotch last night?
John Epler wrote...
Vesji wrote...
Hey John! Just... wanted to say hello.
Aehm, how are you doing after that scotch last night?
Quite well. Scotch is something that should never be drank in sufficient quantities to cause a hangover, if you ask me.
John Epler wrote...
Vesji wrote...
...
Quite well. Scotch is something that should never be drank in sufficient quantities to cause a hangover, if you ask me.
Fleshdress wrote...
John Epler wrote...
Hey John! Just... wanted to say hello.
Aehm, how are you doing after that scotch last night?
Quite well. Scotch is something that should never be drank in sufficient quantities to cause a hangover, if you ask me.
daecath wrote...
I get that it's meant to be light-hearted, but no matter how nicely you ask, no matter how light hearted you are when asking, it gets tiring after a while hearing the same thing over and over. Especially since it's not "X weeks after", it's "hope you still remember our dilema today, even though we've been posting about it every day since the game came out".The Last Guardian wrote...
daecath wrote...
I agree about the pestering part. They've said they're going to make an announcement in April, do we constantly have to belabor this point day after day? I think they get it by now. Let's let them have the time to figure out what they want to do. They might have the most brilliant thing ever in the works, but if we keep pestering them, they might lose motivation.
That said, I actually like the idea of cupcakes. Only don't make them all the same. Do something nice for them not because we want something, not to try and make a not-so-subtle point, but simply because we want them to know that, despite our issues with how ME3 ended, we really do appreciate all the hours of entertainment that they've given us.
It's meant to be light hearted.
I think we all understand that they get our dilema (hopefully). This is more of "here's hoping you still remember our dilema X weeks after" in a not so "burn bioware burn!" sort of way.
Plus it's cupcakes, and who the does not like cupcakes?
Like I said, I really like the cupcake idea, I just don't think they should have strings attached. If we're going to do something positive, let's make it completely positive. Go ahead and include a note that says something to the effect that we want them to know that despite this one issue, we really love their work and appreciate what they've given us. That still says yes, we're still here, yes we still have issues with the ending, but it turns it into a positive message that we appreciate everything else about these games enough to go out of our way to thank them.
I know if it were me, and people were criticizing something that I'd worked hard on, I'd be really bummed right now. A (in my case gluten free) cupcake, and a heartfelt note of appreciation would go a long way towards lifitng my spirits.
John Epler wrote...
And this would be an example of how not to post.
They don't have to eat them all. Just eat as many as they desired and donate the rest. I know some of Bioware's people were looking forward to the cupcakes. To donate them all is a giant middle finger to us from their PR guys.LoganKey wrote...
John Epler wrote...
Darthlawsuit wrote...
We gave you the 3 choices that you gave us in-game. You had only 3 choices. You then chose to do a fourth option that was not part of the choices presented to you. Yet you gave us those choices in-game and told us those 3 choices were all we needed.
Even Bioware does not like being given a choice of only 3 options and chooses another option when the first 3 are not satisfactory. Why is it that Bioware will force the gamer to choose between one of 3 options that are all the same yet will not do the same themselves? Then tell us those 3 endings were great.
Bioware, you really are a hypocrite. We do a gesture of good will and you toss it aside to manipulate it into a PR stunt. Bioware, you have fallen to the Dark side.
One can certainly take a cynical and jaded view of what happened, but, in the end, it seems that this was the best possible resolution.
You guys made sure your message was heard, and disadvantaged children were given a rare opportunity for a treat. I'm always happy to see people choosing to channel their disappointment into creative and positive endeavours, rather than insults and vitriol. It does your group credit.
I agree. Also keep in mind guys, Shadow Wrought talked with some of the employees... most of the devs are on vacation right now after pulling 16+ hour workshifts prior to launch. Even if Bioware had kept the cupcakes, there's no way they could eat them all without them going stale (or throwing the remaining employees into a sugar induced coma).
We got our message across. If Bioware truly acts on our feedback and gives us the sort of ending options that we're hoping for.. we can always send them a Marauder Shields cake.. I'm sure they'd eat that one (and Thomas Abrams would get the head all to himself)