Zaasz wrote...
Not everyone is going to agree, but I personally found that the entirety of the game was well above average, beyond that actually. I agree that Mass Effect is our first true video game "epic" but I also think there could be some more closure as well. This article from GGTL is kinda long, but it sums up a lot of the criticisms and calls into question much of the unnecessary hate BioWare has been receiving.
http://www.gamersgui...efront-and.html
What do you all think? Was it really necessary to attack BioWare personally for something that isn't even THAT bad? Yeah, I think the endings could have answered a bit more and maybe we could have seen more from the war assets in the final battle, but overall I was intrigued by the end.
I understand where you are coming from...but...no...not really.
Why do I feel that way?
Well, kinda simple really. There is no doubt in my mind that BW must have known that this ending would alienate a large part of the "epic hero" crowd. I simply can't believe that in a team that has created something so big and enjoyable (Thresher v. Reaper anyone?), there was no clue that this little green translucent man would infuriate a whole lot of people.
Yet...they kept hyping and pandering to the potential buyers...scuse me...players...as if it was the most certain thing that they will get their variety of endings.
These guys are too good when they put their heart in it to not have known how miserable this ending is. And that is where the hate comes from in some.
Let's say their campaign would have included any hint of "the ending you never saw coming", or "the answer no one expected" or "the utterly unknown revealed" there would be exponentially less hate from the masses.
People are unhappy about the way the ending turned out, they are outraged by having been misled into thinking they will get something coherent that fits the genre and stays true to the story.
The whole marketing was dishonest.
Modifié par translationninja, 28 mars 2012 - 07:36 .