PS3 Users Unite
#176
Posté 14 avril 2012 - 08:15
#177
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 02:34
TrveOmegaSlayer wrote...
PS3 users, can we unite into this?
http://social.biowar...8680/8#11290491
I wholeheartedly support the notion, but seeing as how that thread was locked perhaps we should just leave it be...
#178
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 06:12
#179
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:34
Its kinda funny that the store that I frequent has about 20 used copies of ME3 for the PS3 and a ton of new copies, yet they have all of none, used or new, for the Xbox 360. Coincidence??
#180
Posté 17 avril 2012 - 03:08
#181
Posté 17 avril 2012 - 10:30
#182
Posté 17 avril 2012 - 11:00
You know i actualy hope that happens and puts EFAIL/BioFail out of buisness.Zambayoshi wrote...
Well if it gets bad enough at some point Sony is going to weigh in behind the scenes and accuse Bioware of damaging its brand. I reckon that would have more effect than a thousand forum posts.
#183
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 06:32
I am a sucker and I buy all their games on PS3. I was about to spend €300 on their store but I will forget that and buy Game of Thrones stuff off the HBO site instead.
#184
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 08:27
Hay atleast HBO wont rip you off lol:happy:Cylon King wrote...
I wish Bioware would put a bit more effort with the PS3 community and with the PS3 games.
I am a sucker and I buy all their games on PS3. I was about to spend €300 on their store but I will forget that and buy Game of Thrones stuff off the HBO site instead.
#185
Posté 19 avril 2012 - 12:26
#186
Posté 19 avril 2012 - 12:54
Oure money is nothing but toilet paper to BioFail/EfAil. As long as they have oure money then they can wipe there backsides and flush it down the toilet. I myself will never play another EfAil/BioFail game again.don of all dons wrote...
This is just sad, I give you money, I've bought 2 copies of ME2 (one for me and one from y nephew) and now I've bought ME3 (not to menton ME1: GOTY edition for Xbox 360) and now you treat me like I'm trash, we get nothing: no events, no free swag hell we don't even have resurgence packs....... why Bioware/EA why have you forsaken us? is our money not green?
#187
Posté 19 avril 2012 - 01:36
#188
Posté 19 avril 2012 - 04:03
Cylon King wrote...
I wish Bioware would put a bit more effort with the PS3 community and with the PS3 games.
I am a sucker and I buy all their games on PS3. I was about to spend €300 on their store but I will forget that and buy Game of Thrones stuff off the HBO site instead.
They don't care about PS3 users its that simple.
#189
Posté 19 avril 2012 - 04:19
Lol what makes you think that. The fact that every event is for PC and 360 only, practicly none of the mods comment on the PS3 forums or PS3 continues to get shafted with the patches that seem to make the game worse?unworthyBOZO wrote...
Cylon King wrote...
I wish Bioware would put a bit more effort with the PS3 community and with the PS3 games.
I am a sucker and I buy all their games on PS3. I was about to spend €300 on their store but I will forget that and buy Game of Thrones stuff off the HBO site instead.
They don't care about PS3 users its that simple.
Modifié par BDG420, 19 avril 2012 - 04:20 .
#190
Posté 19 avril 2012 - 05:27
#191
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 03:57
#192
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 04:51
CYB3RFR34K wrote...
@Feirefiz1972
idk why you guys complain about ME3 framerate, i played the game 2 times, platinum it, played until lvl 250+ on multiplayer and the game never dropped a single frame on me.
if you encounter many drop frames that's bc your PS3 system is overheating and probably soo full of dust that it make your game playing sloppy.
i clean my PS3 with an air compressor every month and it run like a brand new since oct. 2009
I treat mine like total crap and it works fine too. Only issue I have is with the multiplayer sometimes. Very annoying issues with the multiplayer. But only sporadically. I played for 13 hours straight one night and had not one problem. Played 15 minutes the next night and it was atrocious. Then back to 2 days of long sessions that were fine. So, no it is not an overheating/dust issue for me.
#193
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 04:52
Zambayoshi wrote...
Well if it gets bad enough at some point Sony is going to weigh in behind the scenes and accuse Bioware of damaging its brand. I reckon that would have more effect than a thousand forum posts.
Skyrim was waaaaaay worse on PS3, but that never seemed to get Sony angry with Bethesda.
#194
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 09:34
Zambayoshi wrote...
Just out of interest, I wonder how many QA staff were on the PS3 version. I was watching the credits roll and there seemed to be around 30-40 testers (from memory). If you take off PC and 360 testers, it may be that the PS3 version had 10 or less testers working on it.
There was a thread in the multiplayer general section about setting up play-dates with Bioware employees and almost all of them play on PC, and the few who don't play on Xbox. I'd say it's safe to assume the same happened for QA.
I doubt anyone at Bioware even played our version once, thus explaining how our version is so bad. There's no way they could've fired it up, saw that horrendous framerate and thought all was good.
Modifié par Battlepope190, 22 avril 2012 - 09:34 .
#195
Posté 23 avril 2012 - 01:48
#196
Posté 24 avril 2012 - 01:37
Sad to see there has been no change.
Hiding the fact that the PS3 version would not only be unsupportable for MP events, but INCREDIBLY rife with unacceptable bugs? How can you make a product in this day and age and get away with selling it if it is not built properly?
ANY other type of product with this amount of consumer issue would have been recalled.
It is garbage that game companies (ESPECIALLY "triple A" game companies) can sell their beta-quality game for FULL PRICE and use the devoted 1st day customers as QA testers.
#197
Posté 24 avril 2012 - 01:45
#198
Posté 24 avril 2012 - 01:48
Mash-X-ToDieSlower wrote...
Hiding the fact that the PS3 version would not only be unsupportable for MP events, but INCREDIBLY rife with unacceptable bugs? How can you make a product in this day and age and get away with selling it if it is not built properly?
ANY other type of product with this amount of consumer issue would have been recalled.
It is garbage that game companies (ESPECIALLY "triple A" game companies) can sell their beta-quality game for FULL PRICE and use the devoted 1st day customers as QA testers.
That is exactly what I am thinking. They should not sell games that are not finished. They take people for fools and expect us to be satisfied.
#199
Posté 24 avril 2012 - 05:16
but but how would they sell us dlc if they finished the game? you cant expect them to come with new stuff when they can just cut out parts of the main game and sell them to us. whats wrong with you man? lol just joking.John7 wrote...
Mash-X-ToDieSlower wrote...
Hiding the fact that the PS3 version would not only be unsupportable for MP events, but INCREDIBLY rife with unacceptable bugs? How can you make a product in this day and age and get away with selling it if it is not built properly?
ANY other type of product with this amount of consumer issue would have been recalled.
It is garbage that game companies (ESPECIALLY "triple A" game companies) can sell their beta-quality game for FULL PRICE and use the devoted 1st day customers as QA testers.
That is exactly what I am thinking. They should not sell games that are not finished. They take people for fools and expect us to be satisfied.
#200
Posté 24 avril 2012 - 09:16
l7986 wrote...
but but how would they sell us dlc if they finished the game? you cant expect them to come with new stuff when they can just cut out parts of the main game and sell them to us. whats wrong with you man? lol just joking.John7 wrote...
Mash-X-ToDieSlower wrote...
Hiding the fact that the PS3 version would not only be unsupportable for MP events, but INCREDIBLY rife with unacceptable bugs? How can you make a product in this day and age and get away with selling it if it is not built properly?
ANY other type of product with this amount of consumer issue would have been recalled.
It is garbage that game companies (ESPECIALLY "triple A" game companies) can sell their beta-quality game for FULL PRICE and use the devoted 1st day customers as QA testers.
That is exactly what I am thinking. They should not sell games that are not finished. They take people for fools and expect us to be satisfied.
Adding additional content is not the issue. They can sell supplimentary content all they want.
The issue is selling the INITIAL RELEASE as a finished, polished, consumer-ready product when it has too many bugs, glitches and failures to be considered such. The issue is providing additional content (weekly multiplayer community events) to only 2 of the 3 available platforms without informing the 3rd platform users that they will be unable to participate (doesn't matter what the reason, it's wrong to have not told the public that PS3 would be excluded.) Others have issues that are just as valid (if not more) that still have not been even remotely addressed by customer service.
My point is that if The Avengers was released on May 4th and Joss Whedon sent a rough-edit with frames of CGI missing to theatres, charged us full price, didn't tell us the film wasn't finished, and then put the ticket sales towards finishing the movie so we could flash our ticket stub and see the polished cut a month later, there would be a riot.
I didn't freaking kickstarter Mass Effect 3. I didn't (intentionally) buy the beta version. I bought the "finished" product.





Retour en haut






