Jonwes wrote...
The Reapers are "pruning" the populace and getting rid of only the most advanced civilizations and the synthetics (or taking over the synthetics.) This gets rid of the synthetics to prevent them from destroying ALL life and gets rid of the beings capable of producing more synthetics... for a time. They leave the young races. The idea is that in this way non-synthetics are never totally wiped out. Seems clear enough.
The problem is that non-sythetics have never been totally wiped out. The fact that non-synthetics still exist is proof that the boy created the Reapers as a solution that to a problem which doesn't actually exist. He talks about this as if it is entirely certain to take place if he didn't do anything, but an event which has never taken place can not have a probability assigned to it, let alone certainty assigned to it.
Also, using the possible Geth/Quarian peace as an example to say the Catalyst is wrong is silly. The Geth DID rebel against their creators at one point. The fact that Shepard (might have) brokered a peace doesn't change that, nor does it prevent other organics from making other synthetics in the future that will rebel and destroy all organic life as the Catalyst fears. The Catalyst has seen this happen over and over. His reference point is not as limited as our experience.
The Geth didn't wipe the Quarians out. They were perfectly content to let the Quarians leave the system, and they didn't bother anybody for the next 300 years... when the Reapers started getting involved.
Also, every synthetic we see in the game except the Reapers kills only out of self-preservation instinct. The Heretic Geth kill only because they follow the Reapers, so they're no different from indoctrinated organics.
Now, whether Shepard should just believe what the Catalyst says is another matter, but what he actually says is not illogical.
Right, it's only not illogical if you don't consider false premises to be logical errors.





Retour en haut





