Which Dwarf?
#1
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:40
#2
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:44
#3
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:45
Harrowmont is the "conservative" one, he is more sensible but perhaps not the "strongest" of leaders, he also prefers to keep things traditional as far as dwarven society goes.
Bhelen, while a malicious power hungry kinslayer, is a very strong leader and wants to change dwarven society to be less oppressive to the lower castes.
#4
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:46
Harrowmont probably is a bit more on the less evil side, but Bhelen seems like the better leader/more suitable candidate.
That's about it in a nutshell. Just go with your gut feeling! When you reach the epilogue and finally see what your choice means for dwarven society, it'll impact you much more.
#5
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:47
#6
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:48
Argh, stupid politics...
#7
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:52
My advice pretty much agrees with the others: don't dwell on the choice too much, since you can always choose the other one the next play-through. Just make sure you pay attention to the epilogue to see how your choices affect the world...
#8
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:52
I always play the "good" guy, so I push Harrowmont for king.
#9
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 03:53
#10
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 07:41
#11
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 07:46
only time consuming evil and less evil
#12
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 07:49
#13
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:00
Of course the city was NEARLY at war during the events of the game, so it probably isn't a bad inference.
Also, I've never seen any mention of Orzammar losing power under Bhelen's rule. The ASSEMBLY does, absolutely. He pulls a dissolves the Assembly so they stop trying to undermine him. There can only be one Caesar, afterall.
#14
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:01
Bhelen killed his eldest brother and placed that blame on the 2nd eldest brother, causing him to be sent to the Deep Roads. Bhelen is then the only one left of the Audecan line.
But from the epilogue, Harrowmont tried his best to rule Orzammar, but he had to deal with dissenters and later on it was said he died of a broken spirit.
But from what others have said, Bhelen made Orzammar prosperous.
So this is truly a really grey area of the game. Would you support a murderer who would kill his own brothers, to ensure Orzammar is in a better state?
Edit: For a casteless dwarf like myself, it's even more grey. My sister is a concubine of Prince Bhelen. If I roleplay my character truly, I cannot go against my own sister, who has been through a lot in the beginning. I cannot even get to choose Harrowmont. Plus Bhelen will remove the caste system, which is a very strong reason to support him, despite being someone who murders his own brothers.
Modifié par Original182, 02 décembre 2009 - 08:09 .
#15
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:04
DarkSpiral wrote...
Also, I've never seen any mention of Orzammar losing power under Bhelen's rule. The ASSEMBLY does, absolutely. He pulls a dissolves the Assembly so they stop trying to undermine him. There can only be one Caesar, afterall.
Yes that's what I meant. Orzammars diplomatic power is given to Bhelen (Current king) rather than shared with the assembly/house of nobles. Where before the king was elected via assembly now it would be carried on through lineage.
Modifié par Rainen89, 02 décembre 2009 - 08:04 .
#16
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:06
Boeresmurf wrote...
in politics there is no good and angels.
only time consuming evil and less evil
Anyone know this?
#17
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:07
Also, the two different coronation finals should give a clear shot of who's good and who's bad.
Finally, follow the last king's advice, since again, in the dwarf noble origin, the father will write a letter to you, given by the dwarven merchant in Denerim (your first companion too) along with the shield of Aeducan. There, everything is explained, or better, nothing is, but he and you know, as well as Harrowmont.
#18
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:08
So it's less of a gray area and more of an issue of understanding another culture.
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 02 décembre 2009 - 08:09 .
#19
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:10
#20
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:11
izmirtheastarach wrote...
I wish this had been better explained at the outset. Because of the nature of dwarven politics as portrayed by the game, the only sane choice is the one who will stop at nothing to achieve his goals. Harrowmat is a kind and fair king, but that isn't what is required to lead the dwarves to prosperity. They need an iron fist. Though there are a few combinations in the epilogue, Bhelen is always the better king.
So it's less of a gray area and more of an issue of understanding another culture.
I'm really shocked, you really think it's ok to murder your own brothers just to be king? I can see where you're coming from, as I have also pointed out that Bhelen in the epilogue was the better ruler. But the way you dismiss Prince Bhelen's actions is a bit disturbing.
Modifié par Original182, 02 décembre 2009 - 08:20 .
#21
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:26
#22
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:29
#23
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:29
Rainen89 wrote...
Harrowmont is no better, he calls for your execution (if you're a dwarf commoner) all because you went to a proving kicked everyones ass but are not a noble or warrior so therefore shamed everyone. Harrowmont is hardly the lovable fluffy bunny everyone thinks he is.
That was not Harrowmont.
#24
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:32
#25
Posté 02 décembre 2009 - 08:37
And this is Harrow: http://dragonage.wik..._Harrowmont.JPG





Retour en haut






