An "I told you so" moment for many (perhaps? no -.-)
#301
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:37
Why doesn't everyone just chill until April?
#302
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:38
Purple People Eater wrote...
If it turns out to be Indoctrination, the "I told you so" threads will go on for months. I know I plan on starting a few.
And if it's not, a lot of fans will be extremely upset.
Modifié par FemmeShep, 28 mars 2012 - 01:39 .
#303
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:38
TheMadBlimper wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
If it turns out to be Indoctrination, the "I told you so" threads will go on for months. I know I plan on starting a few.
I think we should start taking bets and get a pool going, personally.
I think I'll just get drunk. Seriously this puts my entire perception of reality into question.
#304
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:39
InsaneAzrael wrote...
"f your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected." - Sun Tzu
Time to organise for PAX on the fan-side.
You know you're kinda boned when you're calling the same people you're trying to convince to create more gaming content for you, your 'enemy'.
Not really helping.
Modifié par pikey1969, 28 mars 2012 - 01:40 .
#305
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:40
InsaneAzrael wrote...
"f your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected." - Sun Tzu
Time to organise for PAX on the fan-side.
Lets invade PAX bathrooms, they are not going to "release" until they "release us" a better ending.
#306
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:40
Apparently, even the people who work for EA/BioWare.
#307
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:40
+1Sc2mashimaro wrote...
I hope every single one of the Indoc. theorists and "the ending is not complete" people get to say "I told you so" in April. Really. Because there would be nothing cooler than the unreliable narrator take on the ending and it would make everything make sense in the world again. Even so, call me Thomas the doubter, but I will wait until I see it.
#308
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:41
#309
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:41
FemmeShep wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
If it turns out to be Indoctrination, the "I told you so" threads will go on for months. I know I plan on starting a few.
And if it's not, a lot of fans will be extremely upset.
I will not be upset if they choose not to go IDT
I will be upset if what they choose in place of IDT sucks..
I will only know how upset or not I will be after the announcement.
#310
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:42
pikey1969 wrote...
InsaneAzrael wrote...
"f your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected." - Sun Tzu
Time to organise for PAX on the fan-side.
You know you're kinda boned when you're calling the same people you're trying to convince to create more gaming content for you, your 'enemy'.
Not really helping.
It's a direct quote, I wasn't going to take liberties. But to clarify, what I am saying is that if PAX is the only real opportunity to receive direct answers from the Devs and lay concerns to rest. We should probably have an organised approach.
Take what you want from it. I realise it's just a game, but asking direct questions here on the forum or on twitter is not getting any responses.
#311
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:42
Hell, I'd be upset either way as I dislike the idea of the game shipping with an intentionally incomplete ending.FemmeShep wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
If it turns out to be Indoctrination, the "I told you so" threads will go on for months. I know I plan on starting a few.
And if it's not, a lot of fans will be extremely upset.
#312
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:43
Taboo-XX wrote...
I think I'll just get drunk. Seriously this puts my entire perception of reality into question.
That's a sound strategy, and the one I'm going for as well.
April needs to hurry up and come along so my fears can be confirmed and I can lay my relationship with Bioware to rest.
#313
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:43
Your company is perpetuating a public release nightmare. You are losing fans by the day. We are not asking for immediate change, but a plan of action or cessation of ambiguous statements from the company would greatly be appreciated.
I sincerely hope, for your sake, that this is not an ambiguous ending (indoctrination theory or not) to sell more DLC.
#314
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:44
Chris Priestly wrote...
People are reading the wrong thing into this. We have always had DLC plans for ME3. We said so long before launch. This is not news as ME and ME2 had DLCs.
This is not a comment about "endings" DLC, just DLC in general.
So, it still says that you aren't changing things, don't care at all about the IP or the fans, and we can all give up on your company and go home now?
#315
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:44
Taboo-XX wrote...
TheMadBlimper wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
If it turns out to be Indoctrination, the "I told you so" threads will go on for months. I know I plan on starting a few.
I think we should start taking bets and get a pool going, personally.
I think I'll just get drunk. Seriously this puts my entire perception of reality into question.
You mean you didn't go out and do that immediately after you finished the game?
Hopefully not at a bar, though. Those places are slaughterhouses disguised as nightclubs, I **** you not.
#316
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:44
It's all going according to plan
#317
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:44
Nyaore wrote...
Hell, I'd be upset either way as I dislike the idea of the game shipping with an intentionally incomplete ending.FemmeShep wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
If it turns out to be Indoctrination, the "I told you so" threads will go on for months. I know I plan on starting a few.
And if it's not, a lot of fans will be extremely upset.
True. But a lot of fans have kind of put off being completely upset with the endings, because they have banked it all on being this genius twist ending by BioWare.
And if it comes out it's not that, I think the amount of fans already mad (which is a lot) will get even worse. I really don't know why they can't just say it's NOT Indoc, if it's not.
Lots of speculation i guess.
#318
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:45
Sesshaku wrote...
InsaneAzrael wrote...
"f your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected." - Sun Tzu
Time to organise for PAX on the fan-side.
Lets invade PAX bathrooms, they are not going to "release" until they "release us" a better ending.
What just got real?
#319
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:45
#320
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:48
Raven4030-2 wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
People are reading the wrong thing into this. We have always had DLC plans for ME3. We said so long before launch. This is not news as ME and ME2 had DLCs.
This is not a comment about "endings" DLC, just DLC in general.
Why must you crush our hopes and dreams? Even if we were wrong, why not let us delude ourselves with our fantasy. We'd be happier that way
I think I understand what you mean by this post clearly so what I have to say isn't target at you. I wish BW was a little more upfront about what they wanted to do with the core ME3 game that was released so the fans had a proper set of expectations going in.
Then again maybe this is what BW wanted for some reason. We see sometime next month I guess.
#321
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:48
Sesshaku wrote...
InsaneAzrael wrote...
"f your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected." - Sun Tzu
Time to organise for PAX on the fan-side.
Lets invade PAX bathrooms, they are not going to "release" until they "release us" a better ending.
Don't invade, lets bring them cookies! Oatmeal cookies, and use food coloring on them! Then we'll just stack their table high of cookies if their big announcement isn't about handling the endings.
#322
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:49
Ah, I see what you mean. Yeah, the ****storm will be large and unstoppable if it turns out the indoctrination theory isn't true and we really are stuck with these endings.FemmeShep wrote...
Nyaore wrote...
Hell, I'd be upset either way as I dislike the idea of the game shipping with an intentionally incomplete ending.FemmeShep wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
If it turns out to be Indoctrination, the "I told you so" threads will go on for months. I know I plan on starting a few.
And if it's not, a lot of fans will be extremely upset.
True. But a lot of fans have kind of put off being completely upset with the endings, because they have banked it all on being this genius twist ending by BioWare.
And if it comes out it's not that, I think the amount of fans already mad (which is a lot) will get even worse. I really don't know why they can't just say it's NOT Indoc, if it's not.
Lots of speculation i guess.
Speculation, speculation everywhere!
Modifié par Nyaore, 28 mars 2012 - 01:49 .
#323
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:49
Jsxdf wrote...
Kyle Conway @KyleWritesStuff
· Open
@masseffect Please don't change the ending to Mass Effect 3. Just release what happens after I wake up from under the rubble. Great game!
Mass Effect Mass Effect @masseffect
Close
@kylewritesstuff We are releasing additional content, not changing what exists!
Hide conversation
5:48 PM - 27 Mar 12 via HootSuite · Details
Reply
Retweet
Favorite
1h Kyle Conway Kyle Conway @KyleWritesStuff
· Open
@masseffect THANK YOU! It was hard to sift through the thousand news stories to figure out exactly what this all meant. Will the DLC be big?
1h Mass Effect Mass Effect @masseffect
· Open
@kylewritesstuff More news in April!
And this is why we're not going to get a good ending, IMHO.
#324
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:50
Sesshaku wrote...
Lets invade PAX bathrooms, they are not going to "release" until they "release us" a better ending.
And this is why they're not changing anything about the endings.
#325
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:51





Retour en haut




