If you haven't already done so please vote in the poll in my sig. It was sitting at ~75% belief for a while before climbing up to ~83%.TheMadBlimper wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
If it turns out to be Indoctrination, the "I told you so" threads will go on for months. I know I plan on starting a few.
I think we should start taking bets and get a pool going, personally.
An "I told you so" moment for many (perhaps? no -.-)
#326
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:52
#327
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:52
Skyblade012 wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
People are reading the wrong thing into this. We have always had DLC plans for ME3. We said so long before launch. This is not news as ME and ME2 had DLCs.
This is not a comment about "endings" DLC, just DLC in general.
So, it still says that you aren't changing things, don't care at all about the IP or the fans, and we can all give up on your company and go home now?
Just speculation! Speculation everywhere!
#328
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:52
#329
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:53
BioWare...YOU ARE A FICKLE MISTRESS
#330
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:53
#331
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:54
Chris Priestly wrote...
People are reading the wrong thing into this. We have always had DLC plans for ME3. We said so long before launch. This is not news as ME and ME2 had DLCs.
This is not a comment about "endings" DLC, just DLC in general.
Maybe things should be written more definitively then? You can't write something as open-ended as that and not expect interpretation, Chris.
#332
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:54
Master Che wrote...
I have no life
This made me laugh so hard. Also:
Taboo-XX wrote...
Skyblade012 wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
People are reading the wrong thing into this. We have always had DLC plans for ME3. We said so long before launch. This is not news as ME and ME2 had DLCs.
This is not a comment about "endings" DLC, just DLC in general.
So, it still says that you aren't changing things, don't care at all about the IP or the fans, and we can all give up on your company and go home now?
Just speculation! Speculation everywhere!
#333
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:54
dude, im with youMaster Che wrote...
I have no life
#334
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:54
#335
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:54
#336
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:55
#337
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:57
runerh147 wrote...
Indoctrination theorists will definately say 'I told ya so'! With all the analysis and evidence thats been provided from the game content...it'll be good to shove it in the face of cynics who 'rejected' IDT without any supporting evidence and the folks who blamed bioware for bad writing
and how could they not though.. Its like trying to explain the boat in one of the 3d picture deals you have to stare at.
"I see the boat, just blur your eyes a little dude"
"F*** THIS s***! THERE IS NO BOAT! THIS s*** IS BROKEN!"
"sigh"
Modifié par Tiax Rules All, 28 mars 2012 - 01:59 .
#338
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:58
Master Che wrote...
I have no life
I lol'd....was just thinking this
#339
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:59
Mcfly616 wrote...
Master Che wrote...
I have no life
I lol'd....was just thinking this
55,000 who don't have lives want something! Is that too much to ask?
#340
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:59
oh priestly...the PR....the PR
#341
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:59
Jsxdf wrote...
wow guys chill..they said more info in april. they will be at pax so you may get the info then. some of you are taking this way too seriously
They won't. They're like a hive of bees, pissing each other off.
#342
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:59
#343
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 01:59
runerh147 wrote...
Indoctrination theorists will definately say 'I told ya so'! With all the analysis and evidence thats been provided from the game content...it'll be good to shove it in the face of cynics who 'rejected' IDT without any supporting evidence and the folks who blamed bioware for bad writing
i wouldnt rub it in their face if its true, it only human nature to disagree, and thats what makes everyone unique
#344
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 02:00
#345
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 02:00
runerh147 wrote...
Indoctrination theorists will definately say 'I told ya so'! With all the analysis and evidence thats been provided from the game content...it'll be good to shove it in the face of cynics who 'rejected' IDT without any supporting evidence and the folks who blamed bioware for bad writing
This is just silly and petty.
There is a lot of reasons to believe the Indoc Theory is not true as well. What's really annoying about Indoc fans is they accept speculation as fact. If you believe it's true, cool. But until it's proven real, it's just that..theory and speculation.
I have an idea. How about no one shoves it in anyones face if it's proven false or true....
Derp, maybe that's too civil.
#346
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 02:00
HOLD THE LINE
#347
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 02:01
#348
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 02:01
Hashbeth wrote...
Wait...did Christ Priestly remove "Let the madness continue"?
oh priestly...the PR....the PR
I must have missed it, but Chris wrote..."Let the madness continue" where?
#349
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 02:01
lolFemmeShep wrote...
...
I have an idea. How about no one shoves it in anyones face if it's proven false or true....
...
#350
Posté 28 mars 2012 - 02:02
Chris Priestly wrote...
People are reading the wrong thing into this. We have always had DLC plans for ME3. We said so long before launch. This is not news as ME and ME2 had DLCs.
This is not a comment about "endings" DLC, just DLC in general.
How is a comment stating that "We never said we were changing the endings" not about endings?





Retour en haut





