112 réponses à ce sujet

[Hydralysk]

I waited 10 years for starcraft 2, I would've waited an extra year for Mass Effect 3.

[Bacusan]

hell yeah. I'd rather wait to get my mind blown!
than play now to get my balls blown

[sendrant]

If I buy a game I want good entertainment. If the game-development takes longer, the entertainment-level will surly rise, at least regarding that Bioware I once trusted in.
So hell yes, I would have waited and while being unlucky because of the delay at the same time full of anticipation.

[MegaBadExample]

Yep. I would've glady waited.

But like DA2... EA wanted the money these games bring in, sooner rather than later. ME3 does feel rushed, and it isn't as good as what it could've been, but why would a big company like EA care? The game has its ending, time to ship it.

Modifié par MegaBadExample, 28 mars 2012 - 03:34 .

[Dudefella]

Me and all of my friends unanimously agree the game needed more time; a mixed group of people who both liked and hated the ending I might add. There is so much in the game, not just the ending, that illustrates that the game needed at least another 6-12 months.

I don't think there is a single person that wouldn't have waited.

[Bobrzy]

muse108 wrote...
Quite honestly I would have, especially after the comments that ME3 had the shortest developement cycle of any AAA title.

> Two years in production
> Calls it "the shortest developement cycle"

LOLWUT

Don't believe everything you read. Some people also said, that endings look like they look because Bioware lacked ideas and time to make something different. Which is not true, especially if you read art book from CE, and watch "The Last Hours of Mass Effect 3" you'll realize, that THESE are the endings they wanted. ALWAYS. In fact, they are as polished as could be. Which hurts even more. They had time and resources to deliver something else, but went with... THIS.

But i digress - the point is, they had a lot of time, game is not rushed at all (anyone who played DA2 knows, how a rushed game looks, and ME3 is not one of those).

Modifié par Bobrzy, 28 mars 2012 - 03:52 .

[Nazzren]

I would have waited a half decade and paid double if they wanted to make the most epic ending to the best franchise in gaming.

[Freskione2]

I was already waiting so extending the game out another few months or year wouldn't have been a stretch and I wouldn't have had a choice (kinda like now...hmmm). So yes, I would've waited but with choices at the end
I wondered how they could come out with the game so quickly after the 2nd one, now I know, they rushed the job.

[puppy maclove]

I would have waited longer than Edward Cullen...

Except he got a happy ending.

[iReplaya]

i would just play skyrim in the meantime

[Naughty Bear]

OdanUrr wrote...

Sure, why not? Longer dev cycle should mean a better product.

Duke Nukem.

[OdanUrr]

Naughty Bear wrote...

OdanUrr wrote...

Sure, why not? Longer dev cycle should mean a better product.

Duke Nukem.

That's why I said "should.":pinched:

And, to be honest, too many developers were involved in DNF.

[Vertigo_1]

Bobrzy wrote...

muse108 wrote...
Quite honestly I would have, especially after the comments that ME3 had the shortest developement cycle of any AAA title.

> Two years in production
> Calls it "the shortest developement cycle"

LOLWUT

Don't believe everything you read.

That was a quote from Casey Hudson.
And they detail the problems they had with coming up with the ending in the Final Hour App.

-----------------------------------

To the question asked: Yes, I would have waited up to one year extra for ME3 if it meant more fleshed out characters (Mostly the ME2 cast) and missions (Horizon comes to mind, as does Mars)

[Caihn]

Vertigo_1 wrote...

To the question asked: Yes, I would have waited up to one year extra for ME3 if it meant more fleshed out characters (Mostly the ME2 cast) and missions (Horizon comes to mind, as does Mars)

this

(even two years)

Modifié par Yannkee, 28 mars 2012 - 06:50 .

[CroGamer002]

Yes, would wait an extra year.

But for endings, we would still need Casey and Mac not have influence over them.

[Dokteur Kill]

Wouldn't have bothered me at all.

[spirosz]

If only the Tali fan's asked to delay it further, Bioware might of listened!


I should go

Modifié par spiros9110, 28 mars 2012 - 06:54 .

[MisterJB]

Right now, it looks like they spent one year making sure Tuchanka was perfect. Then another year doing the same for Rannoch.
Then they realized they were running out of time and spent the remaining five months half-assing Cerberus and the Reapers. Indocrinated Space Naz*s and Space Magic.
So, yeah. I would have waited.

Modifié par MisterJB, 28 mars 2012 - 07:02 .

[Chewin]

MisterJB wrote...

Right now, it looks like they spent one year making sure Tuchanka was perfect. Then another year doing the same for Rannoch.
Then they realized they were running out of time and spent the remaining five months half-assing Cerberus and the Reapers. Indocrinated Space Naz*s and Space Magic.
So, yeah. I would have waited.

Makes sense to me.

[What a Succulent Ass]

Yes.

Considering I'm a Blizzard/Half Life/(former) Duke Nukem fan, a couple extra years is nothing. Games should not be released until they're ready. If nothing else, developers could at least learn that from Nintendo.

[Exodus2000]

of cuz..

[ManualReplica]

Oh you guys still think that Bioware makes all the decisions.

I see.

[armondram]

I woulda waited til Christmas If it meant super epicness

[armondram]

Not to say it isnt epic, bbut some parts of the game feel rushed. Like the import bugs and and journal?? Come on

[Tazzmission]

no because one push back was enough for me

also guys think of it like this if ea did hold the game off again what makes you think ea wouldnt try and force team death matches or capture the flag for multiplayer?


now im not hating on the co-op its fun but we cant assume the single player is the only thing they would work on