465 réponses à ce sujet

[FemmeShep]

HenchxNarf wrote...

Sometimes I wonder if anyone has anything better to do than to troll someone's thread with ridiculous flaming. So what if you don't agree with what he says? Scroll on past.

To be fair, OP made pretty bold claims.

If you are going to "debunk" something, and say others are wrong, you have to expect to get debate/criticisms. And, OP and people that support him, tend to ignore the criticisms.

So how can your claims have any validity when you won't talk about the criticisms people have of your argument...

Modifié par FemmeShep, 28 mars 2012 - 08:07 .

[jvara]

SovereignWillReturn wrote...

Lol@OP trying to debunk Meme pictures.
What a tool. Do something useful.

LMFAO, so true.

[RenownedRyan]

youtu.be/WrjwaqZfjIY

[Vromrig]

Rationalists proving increasingly unrational.

Should stop trying to deconstruct criticisms, should start complaining about ending.

Too much of this today.

[HenchxNarf]

FemmeShep wrote...

To be fair, OP made pretty bold claims.

If you are going to "debunk" something, and say others are wrong, you have to expect to get debate/criticisms. And, OP and people that support him, tend to ignore the criticisms.

So how can your claims have any validity when you won't talk about the criticisms people have of your argument...

CC is fine when it's brought to the table in a mature fashion. I agree and disagree with this thread. He has a point, but he's going about it all wrong. Insults only bait the trolls out of hiding, and he has some of the worst in this thread.

However, if you don't like what he said or find it insulting, don't read it. Move on.

[ZodiEmish]

HenchxNarf wrote...

ZodiEmish wrote...

HenchxNarf wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Try not to respond to dridenx, he feeds off getting a rise out of people.
I'm sure this is bannable as per forum policies, so do what I do and report him.

You're actually the one flamebaiting, so I would be careful.

I am sorry, but if you call that flamebaiting.. then I really don't know what to say.

Saying don't feed the trolls ( what The angry One essentally said ) is less flamebaiting then calling a group of people stupid and then not being able to back up the claim.

I meant in general, because all she/he does is follow people around and insulting them.

In that case I can kind of agree... If your going around trying to insult people then yes.. be careful, and try to knock it off. We don't need insult to get our points across. We don't need to attack, or troll to get our point across. We need to use thoughtful arguements, and logic. ( okay a few meme pictures here and there can be fun... ) But attacking and insulting people does not help us as a whole.

[Tony208]

HenchxNarf wrote...

Sometimes I wonder if anyone has anything better to do than to troll someone's thread with ridiculous flaming. So what if you don't agree with what he says? Scroll on past.

Isn't this what you do in every thread?

[Ultai]

Still looking for traffic for your channel OP? You should really think about putting your typed out link in a sig, it'll save you time on posts and look less obvious.

[cndman]

what a pretentious *****

Modifié par cndman, 28 mars 2012 - 08:11 .

[robarcool]

Looks at OP's arrogance, looks crappy logic. Yep, it is a troll at best.

[Ziggeh]

CGramn wrote...

Unless the Star Child is a time traveling AI, his logic is just a theory.
It's never happened in the history of the Mass Effect universe, or he wouldn't be standing there lecturing us about what is going to happen if he doesn't do this.

Given the time scale we're talking about even a slight probability of it happening, which is hard to argue against, becomes an eventual inevitability. He doesn't need a time machine, just maths.

CGramn wrote...
Synthetics never destroyed all organics, or there would be no organics. It doesn't matter if his logic isn't accurately represented in a meme.

Again, period of time. Maybe his equation (because that's what it is) is based on observational evidence. Maybe it happened a few times and life needed to begin anew (it's apparently incredibly common in the galaxy, so this wouldn't be stretching credulity).

My pet theory is that they did it themselves.

[HenchxNarf]

Tony208 wrote...

HenchxNarf wrote...

Sometimes I wonder if anyone has anything better to do than to troll someone's thread with ridiculous flaming. So what if you don't agree with what he says? Scroll on past.

Isn't this what you do in every thread?

No, I defend my points and opinions, there's a difference.

[Jim Darksworn]

The Reapers motivation was so utterly confusing that it generated a popular and basic meme. The fact that the only way you can debunk it via a forum post should concern you.

[Red Viking]

The OP's arguements in the multiple threads he's made mainly boils down to: "You'd agree with me if you saw things from my point of view." 

However, just because someone can see it from someone else's point of view doesn't mean that they'll then agree with you.

Modifié par Red Viking, 28 mars 2012 - 08:18 .

[Vromrig]

Red Viking wrote...

The OP's arguements in the multiple threads he's made mainly boils down to: "You'd agree with me if you saw things from my point of view." 

However, just because someone can see it from someone else's point of view doesn't mean that they'll then agree with you.

Did not realize Illusive Man posted on forums.

Interesting.

[Thomas Abram]

So far off topic, full of trolls, BMers - Everything the BSN code of conduct is against.

Take it to reddit. Locked.

if you have any questions, concerns or comments feel free to PM me. I never sleep, all I do is eat CUPCAKES.