Debunking a humorous picture and pretending you are debunking the existence of any flaws in the reapers motives is pure sophistry. It is the definition of a straw man argument. Questioning the IQ of those who disagree with you is just childish.
This has been debated at length and those who support the current reaper motives have to ignore the previous two games in order to make anything approaching an argument.
The value add of "preserving" the organic species as a reaper is eliminated when you remember that Harbinger stated in ME2 only humanity was going to be preserved as a reaper. Everyone else was considered genetically unworthy. So in reality, for the majority of the species in the galaxy, the "Yo Dawg" image is 100% accurate.
Further destroying the idea that the reapers consider preservation important, is the cycle itself. We know that Reapers have been killed in previous cycles, as well as in this one. Each time this happens, a previous organic civilization is wiped out. If the catalyst really valued preservation of organic life, he wouldn't risk them in this way. He would have the reapers harvest each species before they could ever construct massive fleets of starships and advanced weaponry to battle them.
This is before we get to the meat and bones about how the catalyst by definition must be an AI and since he doesn't want to kill all organics, he disproves his own hypothesis.
All of this is to say it is abundantly clear that this motivation was never intended until they were writing the third game. It's just the writers being unable to remeber what they've already written and keep the story internally consistent.
The motive sucks and the reapers are devalued as villians because of it. Xhibit is just a quick way to cut through the crap and state this. Anyone with an IQ over 90 should be able to see this.
Modifié par Atraiyu Wrynn, 28 mars 2012 - 02:25 .