---
So I've seen a lot of great arguments against the poorly written ending, including the hilarious" yo dawg I heard you didn't wanna be killed by synthetics" meme, but going over the dialogue again I realized the starchild contradicted himself even earlier.
Starchild: I control the Reapers. They are my solution.
Shepard: Solution? To what?
Starchild: Chaos. The created will always rebel against their creators.
If the Starchild created a solution to a problem, and that solution was the Reapers, how come the Reapers haven't rebelled against the Starchild yet? They are without doubt the longest living civilization within the galaxy, yet they haven't turned against their creator.
The obvious counterargument is that the Starchild didn't create the Reapers. He found the "solution" to his problem only after the Reapers had already turned on whatever organic race created them. That still implies the most powerful rebellious synthetic race in the history of the galaxy can either be utterly controlled and put towards any purpose, or that the Reapers can only be "controlled" and used in a very limited manner.
If the Reapers can be used in any number of ways, then the Starchild has simply been misusing them this whole time by actively bringing about the termination of biological civilizations' development (the same end result as self induced synthetic rebellion) rather than intervening to preserve their potential for growth. We're still back to the yo dawg solution.
If the Reapers cannot be controlled to perform some subset of physically possible actions, such as preserving organic life without terminating the potential for growth, then the Starchild's own claim of controlling the Reapers is self invalidating. The "control" ending becomes unworkable.
If preserving organic life without terminating the potential for growth past a certain point is impossible regardless of what else the Reapers might have done, then the Starchild never found a solution to his problem. His earlier solution was never workable at any time in history.
In all cases, the Starchild's previous actions are either indefensible according to his own stated intentions (I failed to enact the optimal solution for preserving organic life), self invalidating in their premise (I never fully controlled the Reapers), or failed non solutions (organic civilizations are doomed regardless of what I do).
Modifié par minormiracle, 29 mars 2012 - 11:40 .





Retour en haut





