Geneaux486 wrote...
Divitiacus wrote...
You're right. And what is your point? Within those are very well articulated complaints. People shorthand them after that. The COMPANY should not then respond to the lowest common denominator, but the cause of the complaints, which as I said, have been rather well defined. When the company's spokespeople respond to strawmen, that's a problem. At least a few fans have not used strawmen, the official response should be to that, not a deflection.
My point is that they're not well articulated complaints. What people call "space magic" is no more magical than anything else in the game, from the Mass Relays to the Dragon Teeth. What people call the "Starchild" is really just an AI (and possibly organic) construct that chose to form itself in an image that would be relevant to Shepard's mind, and its role in the story is no different than Vigil's was, or Vendetta, or even Soverign. Calling the endings "red, blue, or green" completely ignores the vastly different effects each one of those endings has, and the implications for the future in them.BTW you do know "Starchild" is Mac Walters' actual name for the character in development notes, right?
Huh, no I didn't know that. Doesn't change the fact that it's been adapted into a strawman.
You're ignoring the fact that decisions made in the game have no impact on A B or C regardless of the far flung impact that in the end all end up with stargazing grampa, which was promised by the company. Also, regardless of the impacts, they are all A B and C choices made in what is basically a vacuum at that point, which is exactly what was NOT promised. There are dozens of extremely well written articles on the Internet you can read on this if you have any interest in actually understanding the root problems.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




