BioReaperEA wrote...
Torrible wrote...
BioReaperEA wrote...
The one thing about all this is how EA/Bioware hides behind the whole "This is ART" as a reason why they shouldn't craft their product to what the fans/customers want or at least suggest. When I build an industrial hose or weld together some item, I can call it a work of art. But, if the customer doesn't like it or calls it crap and doesn't work for them... I FIX IT BECAUSE THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT!
If I turned out stuff that's crap, I'm out of business. I don't really give a flying *&@% about the art of it, I want to make the customer happy. If Bioware wants to tick us off and lie about the whole "your decisions have a major impact in the game" then I I'll take my business elsewhere. Da vinci never turned around to an audiance and said to John Q public...Hey, come up here and paint whatever you want in these spots on the mona lisa because it's "YOUR" mona lisa.
Movie makers test screen their movies before release and fix them if needed. Automobile manufactuers, and others, test market their new cars before mass production and fix them if needed. These things are works of art too.
What if half the customers want one thing and the other half another thing? All paid money, so who's right? Artists, writers or movie producers change what they deem is necessary to protect their bottomline. There is no legal obligation for them to change anything to appease the consumer.
In this case, you can argue that maybe it is a good thing (for both parties) for Bioware to rewrite the ending. What you can't argue for is that they MUST change it or the consumer is ENTITLED to a rewrite. False advertising also doesn't come into it. Your past decisions do matter in this game. There are literally 16 different endings. Sure, they have been economical with the truth with regards to the ending but try telling the courts that this constitutes false advertising. The fact that the fan who complained to the Feds was laughed at on every gaming forum that I've been to says it all.
Again, just because you paid money doesn't give you the right to demand a new ending be tailored to suit your individual interests. There are many others who do not have a problem with the ending or have a different interpretation of what constitutes a good ending.
Did I demand that they change the ending or fix the numerous bugs or patch the various plot holes? NO...What I'm saying is the given the poor quality of Me3 and Dragon age 2, I will not be buying anything else from Bioware given their current direction. If they don't respect the customer then I won't reurn the favor.
I have played it through several times and the only difference with the 3 Dues Ex endings, oops did I say that, is the color of the light. I also played through with all but zaeed and kasumi dead. Every mission without them in it was the same except for minor differences. I killed the rachni queen on noveria, Oh what's this a rachni queen for grunt or that other krogan to deal with. Oh, I blew the collector base apart (or saved it) where nothing bigger than an atom could survive and there is the proto-reaper at cronos station. I could go on, but the only difference is in the total military strength number which can be reached no matter what you did in previous games.
If you like being jerked around and have no b@!!$ to take a stand, then just keep giving away your money for a turd. Say nothing and expect nothing.
I should clarify that much of my post is directed towards people who are making demands. If you are not, then I apologise. However, your claim that 'companies should fix what the customers are unhappy with because they are always right' does suggest that to some degree. I have no problems with the ending. Even if I do, I'd just express my disappointment, while acknowledging that the game is mostly great. I don't see the need to take a stand of any kind.
Modifié par Torrible, 29 mars 2012 - 10:45 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





