Holy Crap Check These Out
#151
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 04:31
Game/Gamestation just went in to administration. Now is not the the time play silly buggers with big retail releases.
#152
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 04:33
See, we've been going along with DLC. Why not, in its basic form? Instread of a 30-hour expansion for $30, we get slices of expansions for $10. Brilliantly, fluff can also be sold for 1-10 bucks, and not affect anyone else's actual game.
But this crap is pushing it too far, too fast. Left at a reasonable pace, we'd keep doing it, no problem, and profits will rise. But now? Kickstarter's just the first example.
A comic artist from Philadelphia went on Kickstarter to ask his fans for $55k to reprint some of his books. At the end of the drive, he had 1.2 million. That's One Point Two MILLION dollars. As it got out of hand he offered all sorts of fun stuff to backers, but even will all that, there was obviously more than enough to reprint EVERY damn book, and a lot more besides. And remember that the stuff he's funding will, itself, be sold.
Studios like the kids at Bastion prove you can make creative, original, engaging commercial art without holding your customers hostage. Places like Kickstarter will be the go-to for independent studios, designers, artists, musicians, anyone who can market an idea to the crowd.
Overuse of DLC will drive more people to this solution. Left at a reasonable pace, DLC would not cause people to get up in arms and flock to small indie studios; but driving it too hard, being too obviously greedy, causes backlash like this, and will.
#153
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 06:57
you are both correct in drawing a distinction legally it could be possible from a programming standpoint to say that your choices account for what is occuring in the end game and in general the language of the marketing is vague enough that a half decent lawyer could argue that all marketing promises were kept. However, I differ on the ethical issues. That we are even having to debate legalilty would be an indication that Bioware/EA are very close to crossing the ethical line, if they have not crossed it already. That is probably the single most important facor for them right now, they seem to have painted themselves in a corner - not a very good place to be in business. If they come out and say indoctrination was the intent all along and that there is a secret DLC ending that was going to be released after the fact they could face legal reprisal for having sold and marketed the game as a complete ending. If they come out and say they made a mistake, the story got away from them - it was group think at the highest levels - well, you lose the respect of the people who push your games like IGN, Gamefaqs, etc. and possibly damage a healthy money making relationship with the big reviewers but in the long term gain the respect of the fans. Say nothing, keep your money, your in-pocket reviewers, damage relationship with fans. They've already made the decision though and from a business perspective the ongoing silence doesn't seem like good news for the fans.
edited-
Modifié par malra, 29 mars 2012 - 07:00 .
#154
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 07:11
#155
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 07:13
Orange Tee wrote...
That first link is disturbing indeed.... But I'd do it for ME. Heck even if it cost $20
My point exactly
other games i will not pay for the ending.
Modifié par Dendio1, 29 mars 2012 - 07:18 .
#156
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 07:24
Dumb down the population so they can trick them more easily, using our money to do so
Won't last, at some point there'll be too many dummies and not enough money, so make it now!
#157
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 07:40
However, releasing game unfinished and then selling missing part as DLC, after asking full price for original? No, it does not work that way.
#158
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 07:46
#159
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 07:57
Orange Tee wrote...
That first link is disturbing indeed.... But I'd do it for ME. Heck even if it cost $20
No. If you do that, I feel I have the right to call you all sorts of names, because that **** is absolutely unacceptable.
If they charged money for a fix to that broken ending we've got, I will go out of my way to hurt EA and BioWare in any way I possibly can and that would include doing all I could to make people think twice before buying it, even if that means open harassment.
This is absolutely INSANE, people! Does Day-One DLC ring a bell? Many of us have paid for stuff that was on the disc and obviously was ready for shipping by the time ME3 was ready for mass production (and NOT produced after the game was finished - I don't believe that for a minute). We were ripped off and lied to, and we mostly let them get away with it! But they are going more and more in the direction of chopping games up and selling them to us piece by piece.
And this is where I draw the line. If I was a customer of any of these companies, I would declare open war on them. If this becomes the rule, not the exception, then piracy seems to be the only reasonable way to even get games in the future, because I will not pay full price for anything that isn't a complete game by any stretch of the imagination.
I refuse to let companies do that without making them feel my wrath and loathing.
Modifié par JulienJaden, 29 mars 2012 - 07:58 .
#160
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 07:59
#161
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 10:00
Makes me wonder how ripping fans like this is considered smart business and obviously okay in the eyes of gaming companies, while giving the fans the ending they desperately want is wrong adn against their artistic vision and integrity?
#162
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 11:18
#163
Posté 29 mars 2012 - 11:55
Our_Last_Scene wrote...
Judging by the Retake movement, gamers are just whiney brats that'll give games that cater to fans 0/10 and will do disgusting things like compare it to getting their mother raped, or asking for people in Bioware to be fired, or the company to collapse, or make threads on how to get refunds and praise support on the people that do.
The fans are no better than the companies in my eyes.
Dont lump all of us in there, yeah some are acting like this and need a real reality check but companies like this need to be held accountable for these actions
#164
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 12:08
Mendelevosa wrote...
Screw this, I'm going back to board games. Unless they start excluding game pieces from the packages and charging me extra for dices, cards, and player pegs.
LOL yea imagine monopoly without go, DO NOT PASS GO PAY NOMINAL FEE FOR GO
#165
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 04:28
#166
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 04:43
#167
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 04:53
#168
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 01:24
E.T. phoned home... and has it's own dedicated landfill.
http://www.cinemable...rica-40953.html
#169
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 01:27
#170
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 01:46
If true, and both PS4 and Xbox 720 have anti-used games built in, then I've just become a loyal Nintendo Wii U customer.FatalX7.0 wrote...
Just like the next Xbox/Durango, we've heard from multiple sources that the Orbis will likewise have
some kind of anti-used games measures built into the console.
I'll keep my 360, enjoy the library of great games there, and forget Microsoft and Sony ever existed.
(Of course, all this is just uninformed speculation until E3 2013 at the very earliest.)
Modifié par apieros, 30 mars 2012 - 01:47 .
#171
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 05:30
#172
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 04:28
#173
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 07:18
FatalX7.0 wrote...
The video game industry makes me sad.
http://kotaku.com/58...are-the-details
They can go to hell.
The ONE reason I'm a console gamer is to avoid all the DRM and liscensing crap you get on PCs. If Sony and Microsoft, pull something like that, I'll go back to PC gaming. And only for a few of the exceptional titles (and anything CD Projekt puts out).
#174
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:53
#175
Posté 02 avril 2012 - 04:57
Modifié par csmokey, 02 avril 2012 - 05:08 .





Retour en haut






