Aller au contenu

Photo

Why the Catalyst's Logic is Right (Technological Singularity)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1057 réponses à ce sujet

#476
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages

MisterJB wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

They wipe out civilization right when they are about to wipe out/make peace with synthetics, Javik says they were about to kill the Metacon when the reapers attacked, Shepard makes peace with/wipe out the Geth,


These points are adressed in the OP.
Winning one battle does not equal winning the war. More synthetics will, inevitably, be created and organics might lose the war next time.
Or the geth migth simply rebel again.

Wiping them out doesn't imply that the war is still ongoing, eradicating the enemy is pretty much total victory.

Modifié par Humanoid_Typhoon, 13 avril 2012 - 10:02 .


#477
Hawk227

Hawk227
  • Members
  • 474 messages
Thanks for responding to my points. I'd like to add that for a sentient (even synthetic) species, self-evolution proceeds at some (maybe constant) rate up until the singularity. Look at the Geth, Tali tells you they have changed immensely in 300 years. The more I think about it, the more the stagnation of self evolution supports post-singularity. If they were pre-singularity we would see gradual improvement (New Reapers would be better than old reapers) until that "event horizon". But if they were sufficiently post-singularity (and I know you already acknowledged this) we may well see a plateau.

JShepppp wrote...

27. There is no reason to assume the Catalyst is being truthful.

I
doubt it would be put in the game otherwise, but if you believe this,
that's totally fine of course. That obviously changes everything. If you
can doubt one thing it says in terms of truthfulness/lying (meaning it
doesn't believe what it's saying) then you have no reason to trust
anything. None of the endings may work and Shepard may just get
electrocuted (Blue/Green) or explode (Red) in all of them without the
Crucible firing. It opens the door to literally an infinite amount of
interpretations, I believe.

There is also the truth that the
Reapers need organics to "reproduce", though we don't know how important
"reproduction" is for them because they seem to at least lose more
Reapers this cycle than gain. If reproduction is the most important
thing, I wonder why they didn't just cut their losses and try to
obliterate everyone instead of trying to harvest.
But who knows. The
Catalyst's lack of truthfulness would throw a lot of doubt and
speculation into things. 


This is an interesting point. But its important to remember that this is a very anomalous cycle. The Prothean researchers on Ilos changed the Keeper frequencies, so that the Reapers couldn't surprise attack. This is the first time they haven't eliminated the central government and crippled travel (turning off relays) before anyone knew they were under attack. Despite that, they are still pretty arrogant about their chances. Sovereign thinks very little of you. Harbinger is unconcerned about you. The Rannoch Reaper isn't scared. Maybe they keep harvesting because they aren't intimidated. Also, places they're battling (like palaven, or anywhere shepard goes) rather than Harvesting (like Earth) is where they are losing Reapers.

Also, once this cycle is over they can reprogram the keepers, and go back to having easier cycles so in the long run its a wash for them.

#478
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages

Hawk227 wrote...

Thanks for responding to my points. I'd like to add that for a sentient (even synthetic) species, self-evolution proceeds at some (maybe constant) rate up until the singularity. Look at the Geth, Tali tells you they have changed immensely in 300 years. The more I think about it, the more the stagnation of self evolution supports post-singularity. If they were pre-singularity we would see gradual improvement (New Reapers would be better than old reapers) until that "event horizon". But if they were sufficiently post-singularity (and I know you already acknowledged this) we may well see a plateau.

JShepppp wrote...

27. There is no reason to assume the Catalyst is being truthful.

I
doubt it would be put in the game otherwise, but if you believe this,
that's totally fine of course. That obviously changes everything. If you
can doubt one thing it says in terms of truthfulness/lying (meaning it
doesn't believe what it's saying) then you have no reason to trust
anything. None of the endings may work and Shepard may just get
electrocuted (Blue/Green) or explode (Red) in all of them without the
Crucible firing. It opens the door to literally an infinite amount of
interpretations, I believe.

There is also the truth that the
Reapers need organics to "reproduce", though we don't know how important
"reproduction" is for them because they seem to at least lose more
Reapers this cycle than gain. If reproduction is the most important
thing, I wonder why they didn't just cut their losses and try to
obliterate everyone instead of trying to harvest.
But who knows. The
Catalyst's lack of truthfulness would throw a lot of doubt and
speculation into things. 


This is an interesting point. But its important to remember that this is a very anomalous cycle. The Prothean researchers on Ilos changed the Keeper frequencies, so that the Reapers couldn't surprise attack. This is the first time they haven't eliminated the central government and crippled travel (turning off relays) before anyone knew they were under attack. Despite that, they are still pretty arrogant about their chances. Sovereign thinks very little of you. Harbinger is unconcerned about you. The Rannoch Reaper isn't scared. Maybe they keep harvesting because they aren't intimidated. Also, places they're battling (like palaven, or anywhere shepard goes) rather than Harvesting (like Earth) is where they are losing Reapers.

Also, once this cycle is over they can reprogram the keepers, and go back to having easier cycles so in the long run its a wash for them.


No problem, I try to respond to as many points as I can. Understanding the Catalyst is an ongoing effort lol and it's cool to see what others think. 

If there is a plateau of evolution, so to speak, then yeah, the Catalyst's arguments fall flat absolutely because in "infinite" time organics will catch up after the singularity. Personally, I don't know if we can state that with certainty, but it is a very valid point. 

And it's true that this is an exceptional cycle, explained sufficiently enough through in-game lore and of course explained out-of-game merely because otherwise there'd be no story. While seeming stupid on their part, the idea of the Reapers having no fear is definitely supported by in-game observations. Maybe it's more like they don't have emotions at all, both blinding them to possible remorse and fear. 

Another reason why the Reapers are doing so bad this time around is that they didn't take the Citadel, turn the relays on/off, and systematically focus on each race/system with their full force. An idea was floating around on the forums that the Reaper IFF from ME2 would be able to override the Reapers' mass-relay-kill-swith so to speak and thereby render this tactic invalid; therefore, they didn't bother with the Citadel and went straight to hub worlds. But, as is usual with these kinds of things, not enough is explained in-game to tell us what's going on lol. 

#479
Skvindt

Skvindt
  • Members
  • 236 messages
I'm SRX and I'm bumping my favorite thread on the BSN.

#480
slimshedim

slimshedim
  • Members
  • 366 messages
The reproduction point is stupid. Superior machines would rather treat us like we treat our domesticated animals. The machines in Matrix are good examples of how that would look like, since leaving us alone for ~50K years poses huge risks. We could annihilate ourselves in stupid wars and go extinct. We could pollute our planets way before we develop space travel and go extinct. We could create machines and have them surpass us (singularity) before the cycle is complete and so on. Just look at how we're treating domesticated animals. We don't leave them alone, we care for them, we protect them since we know we are dependent from them (meat, eggs, milk, bacon ;-)). It would not make sense for the Reapers to leave us alone and risk us getting killed meanwhile when they're hibernating in dark space.

Also, if they need organic species for reproduction, why do they leave primitives survive into the next cycle? To harvest them later, yeah, that makes sense. But would supervising their development, ensuring their survival until they're ready to be processed not make more sense, just as we do with domesticated animals? There would be no need for them to develop space travel, advanced weaponry and stuff...

Logically, there is no reason for Reapers to be semi-synthetic. Being half-organic is inefficient for tools and Reapers are merely tools, since somebody is controlling them: The SpaceBrat. Organic tissue needs nourishment, or it dies. Therefore the Reapers would need food. Where does that food come from? Are there farms inside the cuttlefish where husks play reallife Farmville for 50K years? Synthetics do not need food, water, vitamines. Synthetics do not die from aging unlike organics. It does not make sense for tools to be organic or partially-organic, especially if you need to sustain them for 50K years!

All the efforts you put into the whole reasoning to justify the Catalyst's raison d'être are just absurd. There is neither a need for the Catalyst, nor his flawed logic that's entirely based on a circulary argument.

Modifié par slimshedim, 15 avril 2012 - 05:03 .


#481
Skvindt

Skvindt
  • Members
  • 236 messages
 

slimshedim wrote...

Also, if they need organic species for reproduction, why do they leave primitives survive into the next cycle? To harvest them later, yeah, that makes sense. But would supervising their development, ensuring their survival until they're ready to be processed not make more sense, just as we do with domesticated animals? There would be no need for them to develop space travel, advanced weaponry and stuff...


I think they harvest 'worthy' species.

The Collector's only harvested human colonies, and judging from Harbinger's quotes they found other species such as Drell and Asari to be weak.  As such, if a civilization can't even advance without obliterating or protecting themselves, they might deem them not worthy.  

It may be that they wait for species to advance as a way to prove their worth.

Correct me if I'm wrong on this.  I am under the impression that they only wanted to harvest humans.  If they planned on doing this to other species like Turians, I did not know.

Modifié par SRX, 15 avril 2012 - 05:25 .


#482
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages
@Slimshedim, I'm going to try to address some of what you said. I know you probably won't agree but here's my input. 

slimshedim wrote...

The reproduction point is stupid. Superior machines would rather treat us like we treat our domesticated animals. The machines in Matrix are good examples of how that would look like, since leaving us alone for ~50K years poses huge risks. We could annihilate ourselves in stupid wars and go extinct. We could pollute our planets way before we develop space travel and go extinct. We could create machines and have them surpass us (singularity) before the cycle is complete and so on. Just look at how we're treating domesticated animals. We don't leave them alone, we care for them, we protect them since we know we are dependent from them (meat, eggs, milk, bacon ;-)). It would not make sense for the Reapers to leave us alone and risk us getting killed meanwhile when they're hibernating in dark space.


There's no reason to assume they would treat us one way or the other simply by extrapolating how we treat those beneath us. What works for the Matrix may not work for ME. As for killing ourselves, note that that's just a possibility. The Catalyst assumes it's inevitable that after the singularity organics will be extinguished. It's trying to fight against that idea that at some point it may be impossible for organics to win. As for reaching the singularity before the cycle, the Reapers have enough mass relays scattered throughout that they believe all races will evolve along their path and thus have a measureable progress relative to the singularity, I think. So far in the last billion or so years it's worked, evidenced by the absence of a singularity after the Reapers came into existence. 

Also, if they need organic species for reproduction, why do they leave primitives survive into the next cycle? To harvest them later, yeah, that makes sense. But would supervising their development, ensuring their survival until they're ready to be processed not make more sense, just as we do with domesticated animals? There would be no need for them to develop space travel, advanced weaponry and stuff...


This assumes the Reapers' primary motivation is reproduction, which could be argued as the purpose of organics alone. The Catalyst tells us the Reapers' primary motivation is NOT reproduction; if anything, that was its main point. This alone indicates that we can't apply our morals to the Reapers since we can't even apply our base values; if we can't relate to them on a fundamental level, then how can we hope to relate to them on a higher level? I'm not saying we can't understand them. I'm saying that I'd guess that what might be logical or right for them is not the same for us. 

Logically, there is no reason for Reapers to be semi-synthetic. Being half-organic is inefficient for tools and Reapers are merely tools, since somebody is controlling them: The SpaceBrat. Organic tissue needs nourishment, or it dies. Therefore the Reapers would need food. Where does that food come from? Are there farms inside the cuttlefish where husks play reallife Farmville for 50K years? Synthetics do not need food, water, vitamines. Synthetics do not die from aging unlike organics. It does not make sense for tools to be organic or partially-organic, especially if you need to sustain them for 50K years!


The Catalyst believes its preserving species' essences or something. You can disagree with that of course. But from the Catalyst's viewpoint the hybrid-ness of the Reapers is a necessity because that is their ultimate goal - to save organic life. 

All the efforts you put into the whole reasoning to justify the Catalyst's raison d'être are just absurd. There is neither a need for the Catalyst, nor his flawed logic that's entirely based on a circulary argument.


Well, if you believe the above, then thank you for your time. You will find countless threads here on BSN hating on the Catalyst, and I respect their opinion and yours. I, for one, will of course continue to expand this thread incorporating all sorts of ideas. But please try to be civil. Maybe eat some ice cream to chill out a bit dude. 

#483
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages

SRX wrote...

I'm SRX and I'm bumping my favorite thread on the BSN.


Thanks lol

#484
Reptilian Rob

Reptilian Rob
  • Members
  • 5 964 messages
I like 2001/Deus Ex rip offs, don't you?

#485
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages

Reptilian Rob wrote...

I like 2001/Deus Ex rip offs, don't you?


Deus Ex did the themes better, I believe. But it didn't have all the stuff and characters ME had. I'm not too sure though because I was quite young when it came out and never played it. 

#486
Reptilian Rob

Reptilian Rob
  • Members
  • 5 964 messages

JShepppp wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

I like 2001/Deus Ex rip offs, don't you?


Deus Ex did the themes better, I believe. But it didn't have all the stuff and characters ME had. I'm not too sure though because I was quite young when it came out and never played it. 

Don't forget Neuromancer and Brave New World!

#487
A_Great_Biotic_Wind

A_Great_Biotic_Wind
  • Members
  • 32 messages
I basically see the catalyst as a very advanced being that basically reached the pinnacle of evolution and is probably the last of its kind, So it basically thinks that it is a God of sorts and tries to control the galaxy. I Think that it wants to stay this way and created the Reapers to prevent any advanced civilization from becoming as advanced as itself.

It really reminds of me of 2001 A space Oddysey in the way the main character evolves into a higher life form, except the catalyst is selfish and wants to be the highest of all life forms or is afraid of what might happen if others also gained the same powers as it.

#488
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages

A_Great_Biotic_Wind wrote...

I basically see the catalyst as a very advanced being that basically reached the pinnacle of evolution and is probably the last of its kind, So it basically thinks that it is a God of sorts and tries to control the galaxy. I Think that it wants to stay this way and created the Reapers to prevent any advanced civilization from becoming as advanced as itself.

It really reminds of me of 2001 A space Oddysey in the way the main character evolves into a higher life form, except the catalyst is selfish and wants to be the highest of all life forms or is afraid of what might happen if others also gained the same powers as it.


First off, your name is awesome. Made me smile and literally LOL. 

This reminds me of the Beings of Light thingy which I never fully understood. If the Catalyst is so powerful and just has a superiority complex then that'd be interesting. It'd seem different and even more unexpected, but I suppose anything is possible. Though if it's really that powerful and is a "being of light" then one can wonder how it can even die or how Shep can replace it as the Catalyst. 

I've never seen that movie but I've heard good things about it.

It reminds me about Stargate (dunno if you've seen or heard of it) but the idea of ascension in Stargate is similar. Helping non-ascended beings ascend (become beings of light) is "against Rule #1 of ascended beings" but the difference is their #1 rule is a policy of noninterference versus a policy of control. Which gets iffy, of course, when they ironically need the non-ascended to kill ascended beings but can't help them. Don't mean to derail the thread or anything of course...just a huge Stargate (SG1, SGA, SGU) fan.

#489
slimshedim

slimshedim
  • Members
  • 366 messages
You cannot answer my questions anyway, since you and me both do not know the answers and all we got are speculations. Even your assumptions about whether SpaceChild is right or not are merely your assumptions, speculations.

As for the Catalyst's logic. Imagine some evil man and his unstoppable army of semi-organic machines annihilating (pick random nation here) every 50K years because they could build synthetics one day and their machines could surpass organic evolution and become the predominant species in the Galaxy in near future. Let's say he didn't want the nation to be extinct, since he secretly cares about them so he preserved some of their DNA in some huge robotic semi-organic Mech-constructs he uses to wage war against the (nation you picked here) and their allies. Woud that have been acceptable to you? Would that be a valid argument, sound logic? They're not annihilating the (nation you picked), they're saving them after all!

Modifié par slimshedim, 16 avril 2012 - 11:11 .


#490
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages

slimshedim wrote...

You cannot answer my questions anyway, since you and me both do not know the answers and all we got are speculations. Even your assumptions about whether SpaceChild is right or not are merely your assumptions, speculations.

As for the Catalyst's logic. Imagine some evil man and his unstoppable army of semi-organic machines annihilating (pick random nation here) every 50K years because they could build synthetics one day and their machines could surpass organic evolution and become the predominant species in the Galaxy in near future. Let's say he didn't want the nation to be extinct, since he secretly cares about them so he preserved some of their DNA in some huge robotic semi-organic Mech-constructs he uses to wage war against the (nation you picked here) and their allies. Woud that have been acceptable to you? Would that be a valid argument, sound logic? They're not annihilating the (nation you picked), they're saving them after all!



About the assumptions, you're right to challenge them because they are only implicitly given in the game at best. 

As for the comparison, I would suggest that Reaper moral codes are different than ours. As I noted in the OP, I do disagree with the Catalyst, do believe it's committing genocide, and do not side with the Reapers in general. That doesn't mean it's stupid or irrational though.

#491
OnlyHazeRemains

OnlyHazeRemains
  • Members
  • 124 messages
Ugh, after reading this (and some more) it actually starts to make sense now...

So it took us only a month and a bazillion posts till we finally understood caseys ending.

Nicely done.

#492
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages

Samurai_Smartie wrote...

Ugh, after reading this (and some more) it actually starts to make sense now...

So it took us only a month and a bazillion posts till we finally understood caseys ending.

Nicely done.


Yeah I think it was poorly executed as well. 

#493
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages
 Just saw a thread here where it shows that essentially the Catalyst says that it won't change its own directive with a low EMS.

Does this indicate that it merely considers the Crucible's choices to be worthless without synthesis (low EMS)? 

Or does it indicate that its programming is so restrictive that it disregards any other options?

I'm assuming here of course that the Catalyst hasn't become rampant or insane like Halo's "smart" AIs and that the Catalyst is still using some sort of rationalization that has at least a partial basis in logic.

Or this may also have implications for the Catalyst being either an AI or a VI and may have broader implications for it being post/pre singularity. 

Thoughts anyone? I'd love to hear what others think and maybe update the OP. If people are still interested in this thread, of course lol. 

#494
vv238email

vv238email
  • Members
  • 85 messages
Here's my take on why the Catalyst is WRONG

#495
Cheopz

Cheopz
  • Members
  • 48 messages

JShepppp wrote...
 Just saw a thread here where it shows that essentially the Catalyst says that it won't change its own directive with a low EMS.
(...)


 like is said in this thread: shepard was not the first

(...)
another point for the IT that i haven't seen anywhere (as i recall) is the design of ME3 itself... it seems like it tries to force you to rush trough the game to minimalize the chance to get indoctrinated (IF you believe in the IT)... think about it: the longer you play, the more side missions you do, the more EMS you gather... all leads to more time for the indoctrination to work your brain... if you du minimalistic run with as low as possible EMS-points (i believe approximately 1,500) you wont get any choice in the end but destroy... if you get to the end with all three choices available catty approaches you with "wake up"... but if you only can destroy, catty sounds a little pissed with his first words "why are you here?"
(...)



 /another bump (come on guys, this thread deserves more attention) ^^

Modifié par Cheopz, 17 avril 2012 - 12:43 .


#496
Belisarius09

Belisarius09
  • Members
  • 253 messages
I'm sorry I don't believe it will always eventually boil down to war. Nor do I believe that synthetics will always win vs organics if war occurred. There's too many variables to say it will for sure happen that way.

SO I prefer to take my chances. I choose free will. You say it will always lead to synthetics killing organics? ok, We'll see. maybe it will, maybe it won't. i'll take my chances. But at the end of the day. I'll give people a chance to make that decision for themselves if it will be war or peace between organics and synthetics. I'm not going to steal their future or their ability to decide for themselves.

It boils down to free will, and the Catalyst robs everyone of their free will. Because "it knows" and its logic is undeniable. duh.

please.<_<

Modifié par Belisarius09, 17 avril 2012 - 12:50 .


#497
justlogme

justlogme
  • Members
  • 277 messages
  Doesn't the catalyst actually mean that synthetics will destroy any non-synthetics  meaning both organics, and in the best ending bio/snthetics would also eventually be targeted for destruction by any synthetics that the bio/synthetics make eventually make?

  Why would synthetics ever be able to turn on organics in the first place aas long as they were controlled/shackled any intelligent race would build synthetics with such built in fail safes programmed in. Kinda huge leap of faith to say well yes some race would willingly build a AI able and willing to kill its c reators, Which kinda bring up the question why were the quarians so dumb/short sighted?

#498
Cazychel

Cazychel
  • Members
  • 101 messages
Fair and extensive. I'm really impressed.

The point in which to question the thruthfulness of the Catalyst is, when it says that the Citadel is his home and part of him. This would render the plot of ME1 complete nonsense. Not only could it activate the Reaper signal without anyone ever realizing, it could also monitor the whole galaxy essentially from there.

Another point is the whole plot of ME2 in which the Collectors try to build a human Reaper. Why at all bother? Why not lie low until the Reapers arrive and hit with all force? All it could ever accomplish was make everyone aware of a threat.

#499
ardensia

ardensia
  • Members
  • 424 messages
Read. Enjoyed. Should really be asleep. Bump.

#500
Hawk227

Hawk227
  • Members
  • 474 messages
So, another discussion prompted me to revisit the conversation with Sovereign on Virmire. First of all... I LOVE that scene. Might be my favorite moment in the series. Second of all I think it really supports my claims that the Reapers are post-singularity.

Here's two pretty good quotes from Sovereign. But the whole convo is like this:

"Organic life is nothing but a genetic mutation. An accident. Your lives
are measured in years and decades. You wither and die. We are eternal,
the pinnacle of evolution and existence. Before us, you are nothing.
Your extinction is inevitable. We are the end of everything."

"My kind transcends your very understanding. We are each a nation,
independent, free of all weakness. You cannot even grasp the nature of
our existence."