67 réponses à ce sujet

[Aldandil]

You can't romance Wynne because she doesn't fancy you. That's why!

[Varenus Luckmann]

If I can have a gay romance with Zevran, why can't I romance Dog? Clearly an oversight.

[Frostaxt]

She is not dead She just would be dead without the spirit. Someone living with an artificial heart in reality is not dead either or not? As long as her body is warm and soft she remains attractive for my main char!^^

[Magic Zarim]

sethroskull79 wrote...

Hahahaha Romance with Shale. Thats great. "Who should I crush?"

LOL yeah..

PC: "Shale, I have to admit, I have a crush on you."
Shale: "I crush you."

[Lonely_Fat_Guy]

sagevallant wrote...

Because Wynn is dead. So it would not just be GILF, it'd be necrophilia.

you say it like its a bad thing?

to me she looks 40+ maybe at her early 50's thats sooo duoable 

look at ging li shes 44 and still banging.
thats shes possesd comes later, who cares about that!

[LordAsael]

Wynn doesn't have the personality for a romance. She might have feelings for you, but she'd keep them hidden and she'd never allow herself to act upon them. First, she knows that her time is limited in this world. It's a central facet of her character that she is "living on borrowed time."



There is also a discussion that my PC had with her when romancing Leliana where she attempts to have me break things off before they get too serious. She foreshadows the need for a Grey Warden in my position to make sacrifices that in the end might hurt my love more than stonewalling her now. Wynn seems to fully expect that I might die, or I might have to choose someone to die in order to save Ferelden. How could she allow me to die were we to become romantically involved ... and how could I ask her to make a sacrifice if it was needed?

[Lonely_Fat_Guy]

Suron wrote...

so that's 4 out of 9...hmmm..seems your wrong...the number of romances vs companions is HIGHER in DA:O

methinks someone needs to re-take basic math...

oh i forgot, 10 years (8years) later and only having to flesh out 9 characters instead of 14 (thats 5 less characters to write for)

you might think we had more options by now....

[DaLabbes]

Lonely_Fat_Guy wrote...

Suron wrote...

so that's 4 out of 9...hmmm..seems your wrong...the number of romances vs companions is HIGHER in DA:O

methinks someone needs to re-take basic math...

oh i forgot, 10 years (8years) later and only having to flesh out 9 characters instead of 14 (thats 5 less characters to write for)

you might think we had more options by now....

2000 years* after the Bible has been written, the Catcher in the Rye still has less characters. You might think there would be more...
...seriously, what kind of an argument is that? Even if you were kidding with that, DA:O is not porn, and neither should it be. There is no logical explanation for everyone falling in love with you, character-wise, it makes no sense at all for Wynne, for several reasons.
1. She's dead. Her time is nearly over, and I think for the very same reason she refuses to become the next First Enchanter.
2. She's the mother-figure. She is not Jaheira; She's much older than her and much older than the PC. Also, we can expect her to be able to suppress her libido and not falling to the PC after two seconds like Zevran.
If she were more like Jaheira, I would say it fit the "type", so to speak. Unfortunately, Wynne is no Jaheira (who was married, remember?).

(random number, Old Testament is older, New Testament is younger)

[DaLabbes]

Edit: Well, hello there, double post.

Modifié par DaLabbes, 02 décembre 2009 - 06:27 .

[XOGHunter246]

Varenus Luckmann wrote...

If I can have a gay romance with Zevran, why can't I romance Dog? Clearly an oversight.

Maybe because bestiality is illegal?  If you wanted this why not make the PC able to romance the children too? (sarcasm) 

[Dark83]

Lonely_Fat_Guy wrote...

in BG2 you had almost everyone

You had three women and one dude. That's almost everyone? 3 for guys and 1 for girls.
Here, we have 2 girls, 2 guys. 3 for guys and 3 for girls.

Also, Wynne is flat out uninterested in you. She knows she's going to die (already has), and she's just sticking around to do some good first.

[Dark83]

XOGHunter246 wrote...

Maybe because bestiality is illegal?

Only in Prude-land. Prude.

Well no, not really, according to wikipedia:
"It is currently illegal in Canada, Netherlands, most of the United States, Australia (except for the ACT), and New Zealand."
Also:
"Copulating with a female alpaca is still specifically against the law in Peru."

[Lonely_Fat_Guy]

DaLabbes wrote...

Lonely_Fat_Guy wrote...

Suron wrote...

so that's 4 out of 9...hmmm..seems your wrong...the number of romances vs companions is HIGHER in DA:O

methinks someone needs to re-take basic math...

oh i forgot, 10 years (8years) later and only having to flesh out 9 characters instead of 14 (thats 5 less characters to write for)

you might think we had more options by now....

2000 years* after the Bible has been written, the Catcher in the Rye still has less characters. You might think there would be more...
...seriously, what kind of an argument is that? Even if you were kidding with that, DA:O is not porn, and neither should it be. There is no logical explanation for everyone falling in love with you, character-wise, it makes no sense at all for Wynne, for several reasons.
1. She's dead. Her time is nearly over, and I think for the very same reason she refuses to become the next First Enchanter.
2. She's the mother-figure. She is not Jaheira; She's much older than her and much older than the PC. Also, we can expect her to be able to suppress her libido and not falling to the PC after two seconds like Zevran.
If she were more like Jaheira, I would say it fit the "type", so to speak. Unfortunately, Wynne is no Jaheira (who was married, remember?).

(random number, Old Testament is older, New Testament is younger)

lol books didnt really evolve much besids automatic prints instead of by hand, computer games did true advances in technoligy.
so there goes your argument.

as for your other points i agree with you.
but it would be nice to see more romances available. and its not about the porn (you dont see anything anyway) its about having options, beeing a character she does fancy or are we suposed to be limited by just a few character types?

i want to roleplay this character!


just search youtube for little britain nan

and its just for fun man, people here are too uptight sometimes

[CoM Solaufein]

No love for the MILF.

[Soepkommetje]

It may be a farfetched argument, but...



maybe she doesn't want to?



All in-game relationships with the PC are consentual (for good reason >.>), and not all of the characters in the world are interested in a young Grey Warden.

Because no matter how you make your character look, said character is young, as evidenced in any origin you can play.

[XOGHunter246]

CoM Solaufein wrote...

No love for the MILF.

It's GILF XD

[Herr Uhl]

sagevallant wrote...

Because Wynn is dead. So it would not just be GILF, it'd be necrophilia.

That would be nothing wrong if your partner shows consent.