AlanC9 wrote...
KingJason13 wrote...
You are missing the point. The claim is that the optimal ending, which I'll assume to be Reapers Destroyed/Shep breathing, is attainable via a first time playthrough of the $60 Single Player game is NOT TRUE.
The problem is the assumption. Or rather, the problem is that Jarrett Lee may have been making a different assumption.
Though since the thread title is whether his post is "accurate," rather than whether he's lying or some such, it's safe to say that the post is not accurate. I don't think ME3 even has an optimal ending in the first place -- they're all flawed in different ways.
Strongly disagree.
They established point values, which clearly tie to tiers of success. The highest tier of success cannot be obtained via SP, only via MP.
This makes the statement stickied at the top of the board extremely incorrect, especially as the post claims there's "More than enough", when in fact, there isn't enough, and there is no surplus.
Since they clearly established point values, and tiers of success, the philisophical aspect is irrelevant. It's a linear reward system, there's no need to bring philisophical analysis into it.
But then, IIRC, you tried using quantum physics to justify the DLC too.