Aller au contenu

Photo

New Coke: Extended Cut


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
179 réponses à ce sujet

#1
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages
EC Updated below

Warning: Wall of Text Proceeds. TL;DR follows.

Posted Image


Imagine with me, if you will, my state of mind three months ago. I happily wrote the following, reveling in the notion that Bioware would ultimately produce an Extended Cut worthy to be paralleled with that of the Coca-Cola brand and its abrupt switch to New Coke, and subsequently its just-as-abrupt reversion to the “classic” brand.


Memory Lane:

I'm sure everyone remembers this infamous debacle that wreaked havoc upon the Coca-Cola Company, and the soft drink industry overall. New Coke. The name rings terror throughout the minds of corporate executives nationwide--if not globally--due to the mindnumbingly terrible business practices preceding, during, and proceeding the release of the devastatingly poor quality product. 

Leading up to the 1985 release of the "New Coke" product--it was glaringly apparent that Coke was losing its force as the most dominant soft drink in the nation. Pepsi scared them--the 24% market share was being overtaken by PepsiCo in supermarkets. To reverse this troubling bearing, the Coca-Cola company market tested and released a new formula to compete with what was being considered as the new hip thing.

It failed, and miserably so.

There was some early acceptance of the product--big marketing pushes were made; they saturated markets such as New York and Washington D.C. and it seemed as though this huge push was beneficial. After all, their sales rose in comparison to their former product. However, this trend quickly reversed itself--there was a massive backlash from a "vocal minority" that basically held the company--and its product--hostage due to the radical change of formula. In fact, media outlets initially praised the product--it was new and groundbreaking, after all. This quickly gave way to media outlets damning the product and the executives for such a radical distancing from its prior bearing.

Coca-Cola quickly realized what a huge mistake it made. But you'll notice the vagueness of the anteceding paragraph, I hope. 

This was intentional, as glaring parallels can be made between the Coca-Cola "New Coke" product, and our beloved Bioware and Mass Effect 3. 

Ignore the first informational paragraph--the numbers pertain only to that of "New Coke" and were for informational purposes only. The paragraph of acceptance is where your attention should lie, as that is where the parallels lie. Mass Effect 3 was saturated all throughout the nation--commercials ran consistently in television shows such as The Walking Dead on AMC, and all throughout the internet. Initially, this push seemed successful: Mass Effect 3 broke records on Day 1 sales and preorders. The sales in comparison to Mass Effect 1 & 2 paled in comparison for the first week.

This trend, however, did not last. There was a massive backlash from a "vocal minority" that basically has held the company--and its product--hostage due to a radical change in plot and content. In fact, media outlets intially praised the product for being outstanding in its field. It was new and groundbreaking, after all. This, unfortunately, did not last and the media frenzy began to die away with media outlets beginning to damn the product and the executives for such a radical departure from its prior bearings.

Seeing the parallels? This will be a defining moment for Bioware, just as it was for the Coca-Cola company in April through July of 1985. Mass Effect 3 will go down in the annals of history as having these parallels. It's up to Bioware, however, if they want the big, bold asterisk that Coca-Cola enjoys: they paid attention to their consumers--they reversed their bearings and moved back to the successful formula that the consumer enjoyed, and they reaped the benefits. They did not ally themselves to ludicrous concepts such as "artistic integrity" to justify a failing product. They admitted they were wrong, and went back to business as usual.

Will Bioware do the same? It is only a matter of time.

Post Script: I guess it's coincidence that both "New Coke" and Mass Effect 3 have conspiracy theorists postulating that these were intentional marketing ploys? Maybe it isn't.


 
It pains me to say—for those of you reading this who have dealt with me over the past few months, you know this to be true—that I was completely and in totality wrong in my estimation and prophecy of the events regarding the Extended Cut. 

Unfortunately for us all, the parallels ended between Bioware and New Coke upon the release of said new cut. 

What we see here is not reconciliation from Bioware for the fans—the patrons—of Bioware, of the Mass Effect series. We, instead see Bioware proverbially “sticking to its guns” on an ending inherently flawed and fundamentally discrepant in terms of lore and narrative.

Bioware, with releasing the Extended Cut, is now akin in no real way to Coca-Cola. Instead of apologizing—admitting they screwed the pooch, admitting that their “New Coke” was a flop—they instead stood by it. They, instead of a re-release of their brand of “Coke classic,” released New Coke with a brand new can design, complete with the ingredients list painted in bold, black ink in large print. 

They could have reflected fan sentiment and maintained their “artistic integrity,” just as Coca-Cola did. They could have added in what made the Mass Effect series such a force in pop culture, which was implementing—and fundamentally changing the story based upon—player’s choice.  

They neglected this, yet again, which is why they failed.

Mass Effect 3 could have been something beautiful again.

Instead, they opted for the annals of forgotten lore and cultural missteps.

>>Writer's opinion? It's truly, truly a shame.


TL;DR: Mass Effect 3 is no longer the New Coke of our generation. The progression of the two products parallel to an eery extent, however Mass Effect, the series in its entirety, separate after the release of the Extended Cut for Mass Effect 3. In essence, the Extended Cut is a betrayal to the fans and patrons of Bioware and is akin to the Coca-Cola Company thumbing its nose to those who religiously bought their products, telling them to “deal with it.”

Modifié par wantedman dan, 29 juin 2012 - 03:51 .


#2
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages
Bump. Forum moves fast.

#3
Raven4030-2

Raven4030-2
  • Members
  • 158 messages
I'm glad I wasn't the only one to notice the parallel. In fact, I fully expect that if they do fix everything some conspiracy theorists will think that the controversy was planned all along so that when Bioware releases its "planned" ending they end up with more sales than they would have if there were no controversy.

#4
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Raven4030-2 wrote...

I'm glad I wasn't the only one to notice the parallel. In fact, I fully expect that if they do fix everything some conspiracy theorists will think that the controversy was planned all along so that when Bioware releases its "planned" ending they end up with more sales than they would have if there were no controversy.


Exactly. I just had an epiphany before class began, lol. The parallels are too close to not mention.

#5
lordnyx1

lordnyx1
  • Members
  • 802 messages
For your pic you probably need to host it somewhere else, wiki may not allow image links.

Modifié par lordnyx1, 29 mars 2012 - 06:57 .


#6
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages
Mind=blown

#7
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

lordnyx1 wrote...

For your pic you probably need to host it somewhere else, wiki may not allow image links.


k thanks, got it! :)

#8
MrGone

MrGone
  • Members
  • 551 messages
Yeah parallels are totally the same.

I mean I remember one time, I looked at a Coke Can, and it told me this long, intricate tale about two lovers so well that I cried. And then there was my Sierra Mist that was so beautifully sculpted it reaffirmed my faith in humanity. But the orchestral sounds of Mountain Dew are well and truly, art above parallel.

#9
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

MrGone wrote...

Yeah parallels are totally the same.

I mean I remember one time, I looked at a Coke Can, and it told me this long, intricate tale about two lovers so well that I cried. And then there was my Sierra Mist that was so beautifully sculpted it reaffirmed my faith in humanity. But the orchestral sounds of Mountain Dew are well and truly, art above parallel.


Obviously you don't understand the difference between the constitution of a product and its marketing trends.

#10
Corrik Ronis

Corrik Ronis
  • Members
  • 367 messages

MrGone wrote...

Yeah parallels are totally the same.

I mean I remember one time, I looked at a Coke Can, and it told me this long, intricate tale about two lovers so well that I cried. And then there was my Sierra Mist that was so beautifully sculpted it reaffirmed my faith in humanity. But the orchestral sounds of Mountain Dew are well and truly, art above parallel.


You're high, Mountain Dew is all about the gangsta rap.

#11
JMA22TB

JMA22TB
  • Members
  • 623 messages
This is what Mass Effect 3's ending did to the franchise

Posted Image

#12
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages
The difference between New Coke and the ME 3 endings is that people liked New Coke, unless they were told it was New Coke. They would do taste tests with Coke lovers or Pepsi lovers, and New Coke was consistently people's favorite beverage.

It wasn't that the product was bad. It was that people disliked the idea of something new supplanting a product that they'd enjoyed since childhood.

#13
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Maria Caliban wrote...

The difference between New Coke and the ME 3 endings is that people liked New Coke, unless they were told it was New Coke. They would do taste tests with Coke lovers or Pepsi lovers, and New Coke was consistently people's favorite beverage.

It wasn't that the product was bad. It was that people disliked the idea of something new supplanting a product that they'd enjoyed since childhood.


Agreed, there were benefits about New Coke--just as there were benefits about ME3. I would argue in that situation that ME3 parallels even your example: treasured canon, adopted over a 5-year, multi-story approach, supplanted by new and unexplained.

#14
Subject9x

Subject9x
  • Members
  • 282 messages
"Coke spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out where it had made a mistake, ultimately concluding that it had underestimated the public impact of the portion of the customer base that would be alienated by the switch. This would not emerge for several years afterward, however, and in the meantime the public simply concluded that the company had, as Keough suggested, failed to consider the public's attachment to the idea of what Coke's old formula represented. While that has become conventional wisdom in the ensuing years, some analyses have suggested otherwise."

from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Coke

this is a beautiful analogy, great find wantedman!

#15
Captain Arty

Captain Arty
  • Members
  • 465 messages

wantedman dan wrote...
I'm sure everyone remembers this infamous debacle that wreaked havoc upon the Coca-Cola Company, and the soft drink industry overall. New Coke.


This makes me me feel like a cynical old fart. I can remember it. Most everyone else on here can't even remember a computer without Google.

#16
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Captain Arty wrote...

This makes me me feel like a cynical old fart. I can remember it. Most everyone else on here can't even remember a computer without Google.


Lol. I admit, I'm one of those people you just mentioned. :P

#17
Captain Arty

Captain Arty
  • Members
  • 465 messages

Subject9x wrote...

"Coke spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out where it had made a mistake, ultimately concluding that it had underestimated the public impact of the portion of the customer base that would be alienated by the switch. This would not emerge for several years afterward, however, and in the meantime the public simply concluded that the company had, as Keough suggested, failed to consider the public's attachment to the idea of what Coke's old formula represented. While that has become conventional wisdom in the ensuing years, some analyses have suggested otherwise."

from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Coke

this is a beautiful analogy, great find wantedman!


+1 and bump. Bioware needs to give this a look.

#18
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Captain Arty wrote...

Subject9x wrote...

"Coke spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out where it had made a mistake, ultimately concluding that it had underestimated the public impact of the portion of the customer base that would be alienated by the switch. This would not emerge for several years afterward, however, and in the meantime the public simply concluded that the company had, as Keough suggested, failed to consider the public's attachment to the idea of what Coke's old formula represented. While that has become conventional wisdom in the ensuing years, some analyses have suggested otherwise."

from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Coke

this is a beautiful analogy, great find wantedman!


+1 and bump. Bioware needs to give this a look.


Agreed.

#19
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages
Shameless promotion.

#20
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

Shameless promotion.



#21
aimlessgun

aimlessgun
  • Members
  • 2 008 messages
Fun parallel. Even a mediocre ending that is true to mass effect would receive enormous praise at this point.

#22
Dark Specie

Dark Specie
  • Members
  • 831 messages
Interestign story, didn't know about this :) . Hopefully Bioware learns the same lesson!

#23
Zaknaberrnon

Zaknaberrnon
  • Members
  • 302 messages

Captain Arty wrote...

Subject9x wrote...

"Coke spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out where it had made a mistake, ultimately concluding that it had underestimated the public impact of the portion of the customer base that would be alienated by the switch. This would not emerge for several years afterward, however, and in the meantime the public simply concluded that the company had, as Keough suggested, failed to consider the public's attachment to the idea of what Coke's old formula represented. While that has become conventional wisdom in the ensuing years, some analyses have suggested otherwise."

from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Coke

this is a beautiful analogy, great find wantedman!


+1 and bump. Bioware needs to give this a look.


and another bump :3

#24
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages
Thanks all :) It seems rather odd how history repeats itself...

#25
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages
Saving my theory from the wretches of the other pages