397 réponses à ce sujet

[SuperVulcan]

Carlthestrange wrote...

SuperVulcan wrote...

Harbinger, have you 'embraced eternity' before?

WE ARE ETERNAL.

I'm sure that, like everone else, you did not enjoy the ending. Was it because you could not have blue babies with Liara? Or was it because you could not build a house for Tali on Rannoch?

[Carlthestrange]

SuperVulcan wrote...

I'm sure that, like everone else, you did not enjoy the ending. Was it because you could not have blue babies with Liara? Or was it because you could not build a house for Tali on Rannoch?

ALL WE WANTED, WAS FOR THE ENDING TO MAKE SENSE. WITHOUT STARCHILDREN. AND SOME LINES FOR US.

[Resheph_606]

Carlthestrange wrote...

SuperVulcan wrote...

I'm sure that, like everone else, you did not enjoy the ending. Was it because you could not have blue babies with Liara? Or was it because you could not build a house for Tali on Rannoch?

ALL WE WANTED, WAS FOR THE ENDING TO MAKE SENSE. WITHOUT STARCHILDREN. AND SOME LINES FOR US.

H.P. Lovecraft propobly now scratches on the side of his coffin I believe. Becouse of the rage, I mean

Modifié par Resheph_606, 29 mars 2012 - 09:39 .

[Carlthestrange]

Resheph_606 wrote...

H.P. Lovecraft propobly now scratches on the side of his coffin I believe. Becouse of the rage, I mean

WE ENJOY READING HIS BOOKS... THE ONLY GOOD THING TO COME FROM HUMANS. IN AN UNRELATED MATTER, CTHULU LOOKS HOT.

[sorentoft]

Carlthestrange wrote...

sorentoft wrote...
Working for the space brat is that tough, huh?

YOU HAVE NO IDEA, HUMAN.

I bet you need a beer. It makes everything better and the best thing about it is that your boss is not allowed any.

[The Angry One]

Carlthestrange wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Why do you say the Collector General failed, when you were assuming direct control, hence YOU failed?

WE ARE NOT BEING DRAWN INTO THIS DEBATE. WE SENT THE CHILDCARE CHEQUE, NOW LEAVE US ALONE.

Yeah about that. It bounced. Cheapskate.

[Carlthestrange]

sorentoft wrote...

I bet you need a beer. It makes everything better and the best thing about it is that your boss is not allowed any.

WE DO NOT INTAKE FLUIDS, ONLY USE THEM TO LUBRICATE JOINTS.

[Carlthestrange]

The Angry One wrote...

Yeah about that. It bounced. Cheapskate.

WELL PERHAPS IF YOU DIDN'T KEEP HAVING THEM TAKE IT RIGHT OUT OF OUR PAYCHEQUE, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO PAY YOU.

[Coachdongwiffle]

Was your artistic integrity effected in any way throughout your time trying to save us from synthetics?

[Carlthestrange]

Coachdongwiffle wrote...

Was your artistic integrity effected in any way throughout your time trying to save us from synthetics?

THE ENDING TOOK ART, AND THREW IT INTO THE TOILET.

[SuperVulcan]

Carlthestrange wrote...

Coachdongwiffle wrote...

Was your artistic integrity effected in any way throughout your time trying to save us from synthetics?

THE ENDING TOOK ART, AND THREW IT INTO THE TOILET.

How do you know about toilets?

[Coachdongwiffle]

Which ending(or color) would you of picked?

[Carlthestrange]

SuperVulcan wrote...

How do you know about toilets?

THE EXTRANET. WE WATCH YOU.

[Carlthestrange]

Coachdongwiffle wrote...

Which ending(or color) would you of picked?

PURPLE.

[sorentoft]

Carlthestrange wrote...

sorentoft wrote...

I bet you need a beer. It makes everything better and the best thing about it is that your boss is not allowed any.

WE DO NOT INTAKE FLUIDS, ONLY USE THEM TO LUBRICATE JOINTS.

Then your design is as flawed as the Star-brat's "solution".

[Carlthestrange]

sorentoft wrote...

Then your design is as flawed as the Star-brat's "solution".

THIS HURTS US.

[jfruelas521]

Harby, do you think Bioware will do a good job with the new ending?

Also, how did you get the name Harbinger?

[Carlthestrange]

jfruelas521 wrote...

Harby, do you think Bioware will do a good job with the new ending?

Also, how did you get the name Harbinger?

WE FEAR THE NEW ENDING WILL STILL HURT US.

WE WERE NAMED HARBINGER BY WHAT YOU CALL PROTHEANS. THE NAME STUCK.

[Casterdael]

One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter, there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small that perhaps in the course of the hour, one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges, and through a relay releases a hammer that shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts. It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.

What do you think of this?

[Carlthestrange]

Casterdael wrote...

One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter, there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small that perhaps in the course of the hour, one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges, and through a relay releases a hammer that shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts. It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.

What do you think of this?

THE ANSWER IS 56.2.

ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL.

[Casterdael]

I see I have destroyed your logic processor.

[Carlthestrange]

Casterdael wrote...

I see I have destroyed your logic processor.

YOU HAVE NOT DESTROYED OUR KITTEN HUMAN, WE SHALL TURN YOU INTO PUDDING FOR OUR ROCKS.

[FellishBeast]

Not to be a downer, but the Twitter account is way less retarded than this...sorry.

[chris fenton]

Harbinger, I lied. I have more questions.
How do you feel about being called Harby?

[Carlthestrange]

FellishBeast wrote...

Not to be a downer, but the Twitter account is way less retarded than this...sorry.

(Don't care, having fun. )