So obviously alot of people are all "precedent this" "precedent that" about changing the ending to ME3 cause of its crappiness. While Fallout 3 is the obvious example to point the finger to when it comes to changing endings, are people forgeting that they agreed to fixing Deception without this much conflict? Why is it ok that Deception gets re-written (and nobody gives a damn) but changing the ending to a tiny fraction of a game is just way too out of the question? This doesn't make any sense.
What's the big deal?
Débuté par
Computer_God91
, mars 30 2012 04:16
#1
Posté 30 mars 2012 - 04:16





Retour en haut






