twincast wrote...
To be frank, I believe they should've just explained it with elves' inherent magical properties instead of some pseudo-scientific recessive genes nonsense, which backfired spectacularly.
Besides, they are half-elves in all but name anyway. It's just that their children can never become full elves (with elf stats) again once "tainted".
Yeah, but, on the other hand,
elves don't actually exist. Neither do dragons or griffons, for that matter. Or even magic.
Not every fantasy author wastes much time explaining if a dragon evolved into a lizard or if lizards evolved into dragons, or how the hell a dragon can fly or breath fire. I find the notion that a creature can *breathe fire* strains the credibility of the world far more than a discussion about recessive genes, yet you don't see people discussing how dragons shouldn't be able to
jump, let alone fly, or how dangerous a dragon suffering from flatulence is.
In LotR, elves are defined as "quasi-magical, immortal beings with pointy ears". In DA: O, they're described as "nonmagical, mortal beings with pointy ears whose child is only an elf if it's conceived with another elf".
Frankly, if you can accept the former, I don't see what's stopping you from accepting the latter.
In other words, "whatever the DM says, goes".