I thought it might be interesting to bounce back and forth between Marksman and Adrenaline Rush usage, or does AR make Marksman Redundant, and just go with Carnage?
Marksman or Carnage for a Soldier?
Débuté par
JnEricsonx
, mars 31 2012 07:09
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 08:11
chester013
-
- Members
- 410 messages
I tried marksman, while it was nice it had several disadvantages over AR.
First of all, damage reduction. To take advantage of Marks you have to be out of cover firing which is a problem when bullets are firing and it offers no protection from damage, as AR does (if you spec for it ofc)
Second, it limits weapon choices. Marks is really only suitable for full auto weapons, burst fire and semi auto don't seem to mesh too well with it.
First of all, damage reduction. To take advantage of Marks you have to be out of cover firing which is a problem when bullets are firing and it offers no protection from damage, as AR does (if you spec for it ofc)
Second, it limits weapon choices. Marks is really only suitable for full auto weapons, burst fire and semi auto don't seem to mesh too well with it.
#3
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 12:28
Biotic Flash Kick
-
- Members
- 1 561 messages
Marksman with a semi auto sniper or shotgun can get fun but AR is leaps and bounds better.
i was a boring as crap soldier that picked frag and fire nades.
It has shields? throw an anti sheild specced frag
it has armor? throw fire at it
it has barriers or health? use both
Light them on fire them blow them up
i was a boring as crap soldier that picked frag and fire nades.
It has shields? throw an anti sheild specced frag
it has armor? throw fire at it
it has barriers or health? use both
Light them on fire them blow them up
Modifié par Biotic Flash Kick, 31 mars 2012 - 12:28 .
#4
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 12:38
Kronner
-
- Members
- 6 249 messages
Carnage sucks. It won't one shot kill a standard mook on Insanity.
Marksman is good, but redundant on a Soldier IMHO.
Marksman is good, but redundant on a Soldier IMHO.
