ME3 wrote...
Even If i had a choice of peace or Geth. I would choose the Geth over Peace because I Dont trust those Quarians
I just choked on my coffee:lol:
ME3 wrote...
Even If i had a choice of peace or Geth. I would choose the Geth over Peace because I Dont trust those Quarians
Rogue Unit wrote...
So.. Who else punched Admiral Genocide in the balls?
Modifié par Delta Sierra, 31 mars 2012 - 03:23 .
Guest_Sparatus_*
EnerPrime wrote...
Let's see on one side, there's the Quarians who have spent the last 300 years getting shat on by the galaxy for things their ancestors did. They found what seemed like a sure shot at taking their home planet back and took it in the hopes of maybe making their lives not an unending parade of racism and mockery from every other race.
On the other hand you've got the Geth, who are isolationist and peaceful unless provoked. But it didn't take very long for them to throw out their "we want our own future" thing out the window and sign up with the genocidal mechanical abominations. On top of that, they could have avoided this war at any time in the last 300 years by realising that they don't need Rannoch. They were pretty much holding on to that planet as a big middle finger to the quarians. If the Geth had just sent a message to them decaring "We're not actually mass murdering machines like we let you believe until now. We've abandoned Rannoch and you can have it back. We're gonna go build our Geth superstructure in some uninhabited system no one wants." the war never would have happened.
The quarians may have poor timing for starting the war, but the geth are far more at fault for having the ability to prevent the war for centuries and never doing it.
Modifié par Sparatus, 31 mars 2012 - 03:23 .
Modifié par Peer of the Empire, 31 mars 2012 - 03:25 .
Rogue Unit wrote...
DaftArbiter wrote...
Rogue Unit wrote...
Saremei wrote...
Rogue Unit wrote...
Saremei wrote...
I made peace. If I were unable to do so, the Geth would have been eradicated. I value organics over synthetics any day.
So you'd spare TIM's life before EDI's?
No, don't play specifics. You can't judge any group on the actions of a single being or group within them.
If I had the choice to destroy all synthetics in existence or wipe out a single organic race, I'd destroy the synthetics. That's all I'm saying.
Fair enough. But if that same race created the synthetics in the first place, then proceeded to wage a idiotic, recklesss war against them on top trying to kill you, I'd wipe out the organic race.
So it's right to punish an entire race for the mistakes of their ancestors and for the work of a handful of callous politicians?
Damn, we should've nuked all of Germany after WWII. Would've taught those Germans a thing or two!
PS: Peace between the two races is the preferable scenario. It's wrong to kill off either of them, war assets or no.
See my previous post about me prefering peace.
Modifié par dgumb, 31 mars 2012 - 03:31 .
EnerPrime wrote...
Let's see on one side, there's the Quarians who have spent the last 300 years getting shat on by the galaxy for things their ancestors did. They found what seemed like a sure shot at taking their home planet back and took it in the hopes of maybe making their lives not an unending parade of racism and mockery from every other race.
On the other hand you've got the Geth, who are isolationist and peaceful unless provoked. But it didn't take very long for them to throw out their "we want our own future" thing out the window and sign up with the genocidal mechanical abominations. On top of that, they could have avoided this war at any time in the last 300 years by realising that they don't need Rannoch. They were pretty much holding on to that planet as a big middle finger to the quarians. If the Geth had just sent a message to them decaring "We're not actually mass murdering machines like we let you believe until now. We've abandoned Rannoch and you can have it back. We're gonna go build our Geth superstructure in some uninhabited system no one wants." the war never would have happened.
The quarians may have poor timing for starting the war, but the geth are far more at fault for having the ability to prevent the war for centuries and never doing it.
Modifié par Rogue Unit, 31 mars 2012 - 03:35 .
sergio71785 wrote...
Yes, the quarians made a mistake 300 years ago, but virtually all organic races would have made the same mistake (humans most of all). Every person responsible for that mistake is dead. Don't hold people responsible for the mistakes of their ancestors.
Modifié par Red Dust, 31 mars 2012 - 03:41 .
dgumb wrote...
I brokered peace between them, but if I had to choose... I'd pick the Geth over them (sorry Tali!).
The Quarrians, especially in ME3, are just so ludicrously myopic and infuriatingly close minded that at some point I just feel like it isn't my job to save them from themselves. They want to commit suicide by starting a war they can't win*? Fine.
* - Not only that, but risk everything and everyone else in the galaxy by almost destroying the dreadnought while Shepard is still on board.
Rogue Unit wrote...
EnerPrime wrote...
Let's see on one side, there's the Quarians who have spent the last 300 years getting shat on by the galaxy for things their ancestors did. They found what seemed like a sure shot at taking their home planet back and took it in the hopes of maybe making their lives not an unending parade of racism and mockery from every other race.
On the other hand you've got the Geth, who are isolationist and peaceful unless provoked. But it didn't take very long for them to throw out their "we want our own future" thing out the window and sign up with the genocidal mechanical abominations. On top of that, they could have avoided this war at any time in the last 300 years by realising that they don't need Rannoch. They were pretty much holding on to that planet as a big middle finger to the quarians. If the Geth had just sent a message to them decaring "We're not actually mass murdering machines like we let you believe until now. We've abandoned Rannoch and you can have it back. We're gonna go build our Geth superstructure in some uninhabited system no one wants." the war never would have happened.
The quarians may have poor timing for starting the war, but the geth are far more at fault for having the ability to prevent the war for centuries and never doing it.
Holding on the planet as a big middle finer? IIRC Rannoch probably would be in ruins if not for the Geth. And you really think the quarians would venture beyond the Veil because the Geth (remember everyone thought the geth were crazy homocidal machines at the time) sent them a message saying "lol com get your planet. we're not bad guyz"? The quarians didn't even act on Legion's offer of peace in ME2. The geth have made steps towards peace, the quarians haven't.
It's their fault the don't have their planet. Nobody elses'.
Saremei wrote...
I made peace. If I were unable to do so, the Geth would have been eradicated. I value organics over synthetics any day.
Cazlee wrote...
I chose peace, the quarians killed themselves as far as I'm concerned.
MadCat221 wrote...
dgumb wrote...
I brokered peace between them, but if I had to choose... I'd pick the Geth over them (sorry Tali!).
The Quarrians, especially in ME3, are just so ludicrously myopic and infuriatingly close minded that at some point I just feel like it isn't my job to save them from themselves. They want to commit suicide by starting a war they can't win*? Fine.
* - Not only that, but risk everything and everyone else in the galaxy by almost destroying the dreadnought while Shepard is still on board.
It's mainly Gerrel. Xen wants to play with her toys, but she's not a freakin' bull seeing red like Gerrel. Raan is wishy-washy, but at least isn't Leeroy Jenkins like Gerrel in a fight. Thankfully, Tali and Koris have brains in their helmets.
I gutpunch him every time. He so badly needs to be put in his place.
Modifié par dgumb, 31 mars 2012 - 03:46 .
Saremei wrote...
Rogue Unit wrote...
Saremei wrote...
I made peace. If I were unable to do so, the Geth would have been eradicated. I value organics over synthetics any day.
So you'd spare TIM's life before EDI's?
No, don't play specifics. You can't judge any group on the actions of a single being or group within them.
If I had the choice to destroy all synthetics in existence or wipe out a single organic race, I'd destroy the synthetics. That's all I'm saying.
dgumb wrote...
sergio71785 wrote...
Yes, the quarians made a mistake 300 years ago, but virtually all organic races would have made the same mistake (humans most of all). Every person responsible for that mistake is dead. Don't hold people responsible for the mistakes of their ancestors.
For me, it has nothing to do with the mistakes their ancestors made. The current Quarrians make quite enough mistakes on their own in my opinion.
sergio71785 wrote...
I like the geth, but honestly, in all the games we've basically met only one who didn't try to kill you. We've fought heretic geth who openly decided to fight serve the reapers, we've fought "true geth" who also openly decided to join the reapers (albeit that could be understood), and hell, we've fought geth that had been hacked by cerberus.
In all that time, we haven't had a single quarian attack us, except for Han'Gerrel. All the quarians have wanted was their home back, and they assumed war was the only way to get it back (It's not like the geth have ever communicated that they want peace to anyone except Shepard). A lot of people forget that everything we learned about the geth in ME2 is known *only* to Shepard and friends. Everyone else sees the geth as blood thirsty machines, and the geth have no one to blame that on but themselves.
Yes, the quarians made a mistake 300 years ago, but virtually all organic races would have made the same mistake (humans most of all). Every person responsible for that mistake is dead. Don't hold people responsible for the mistakes of their ancestors.