377 réponses à ce sujet

[MaG1Xx]

Vexia2070 wrote...

Get rid of multiplayer - Add more diverse places, deeper character development Oh yeah AND and ENDING THAT MAKES SENSE.

[daigakuinsei]

I like chocolate chip cookies.

[felipejiraya]

Get rid of singleplayer.

[Jazharah]

Despite the fact that I really really like the multiplayer part, I'd trade it for a single player experience that didn't feel like every corner was cut.

[wymm666]

They could have done what the starcraft team did. You know, if you KNOW and you KNOW you aren't going to finish an awesome game that will live up to expectation, divide it into smaller bit size chunks. We won't hate bioware for a cliff hanger if it's good. But lo and behold unpolished unfinished and NEVER WILL BE!! MUAHAHAHAHA.....

[AdmiralCheez]

Jazharah wrote...

Despite the fact that I really really like the multiplayer part, I'd trade it for a single player experience that didn't feel like every corner was cut.

Does the ending count as a cut corner?  Because if it does, yeah, axe multi.

Multi's just as fun/repetitive as the sidequests when they were at their best (ME1).  Not sure if krogan headbutting circles make up for the loss of wonder and mystery, though.

[Flipzide]

This shouldnt be a question. Fleshed out singleplayer for sure. I've been happy without multiplayer in the first and second game and I would've been happy without it in ME3.

[ThatGirl]

Single player, definitely.  MP is an entertaining addition, one that I thoroughly enjoy, but as a fan from the first and second games, one that I didn't necessarily need.  If I could trade MP for a more a bit more defined SP experience, the answer is yes--in a heartbeat. 

[darthnick427]

singleplayer obviously. As fun as multiplayer is, I'd trade it away in a heartbeat for more singleplayer content

[Pilotgregster]

Multiplayer was good, but I would have prefered it if they'd focused 100% of their efforts on the single player alone.

[rbrown81]

 No doubt in my mind. More detailed and complex Single player. Story driven and focused side missions, better quest updates and a more detailed ending.

While I do enjoy the MP, I'd give it up without a second thought if I could get MOAR single player content. 

[Kub666]

How is that even a question, anyway. For ME fans MP is useless and was never needed. But for EA:

MP = microtransactions + DLCs = constant flow of money.
SP = DLCs = less money, especially after such a idiotic ending.

Easy choice if you are EA.

[Chaotic Loon]

I would have said dump multiplayer last month, but now...
Multiplayer is just so much fun with the wonderful bunch of friends I've met via these forums!

Modifié par Chaotic Loon, 02 avril 2012 - 10:50 .

[THEUKPSYCHO]

Single player obviously. More stories, missions with teammates from ME2, more guns, knives and sharp sticks to mod. Multiplayer was a means to an end an utterly forgettable.

[Humakt83]

Single Player without a doubt.

[Bfler]

Singleplayer. The story and the characters is what makes ME great.

[DerberAuner]

single player all the way, if i wanted multiplayer, id play bf3 or something

[Pappi]

Single Player, I can't use MP

[LittleTito]

More single-player content.

[Phategod1]

Singleplayer all day

[RKB28]

Since this is a SP game at it´s core, yeah, I woul go for bigger SP. But I´m okay with the present balance.


That being said, the bs about the game being a rush job needs to go away. Yeah, the endings sucked, but other then that ME3 absolutly demolishes ME1 and ME3...

[Militarized]

Singleplayer x 90000000000000000000000000000000000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[crapmonster13]

Easily SP since that's pretty much what most of us bought it for.

[mnomaha]

Never going to play MP. This has always been a SP game. Well, until now...

[Gruzmog]

singleplayer