377 réponses à ce sujet

[DOYOURLABS]

Can I trade the multiplayer for a happy ending with closure?

[Wolven_Soul]

Better SP obviously.  ME has always been about the single player.  MP actually started to get boring for me less than two weeks in.  I did the Project Goliath weekend and that was pretty much it.  It's not that I do not think the MP is fun, I just think it is something they should have saved for ME 4.  The last game of a trilogy is a horrible time to add in MP.

[Wolven_Soul]

spacehamsterZH wrote...

SP, of course, but the premise of this thread is based on a misunderstanding - the MP was developed by a separate team, any rushed or underdeveloped parts the SP may have are not the result of the MP being in the game. The problem is that this game didn't have enough development time.

Well instead of having that team put on MP they could have had them doing something in the SP campaign.  The more people working on it the better right?

[Gorfimus]

Single player of course. For the third installment in a series that never featured multiplayer in the previous games, the addition of multiplayer should never compromise the quality of the single player component.

[Wolven_Soul]

Ratham wrote...

So many people against MP... if you dont like it, dont participate.

No one has said they are against MP, we're just saying we would choose a better SP over the MP.  Try understanding the thread before you say something like that.

[DarkBladeX98]

single player.
I could care less about the multiplayer, honestly.
Just co-op against AI with weapons I have to unlock a second time.

[Darth Asriel]

This is a joke question right???

Single player all the way. I could careless about the multiplayer. I started playing ME series for the story, not for spolsions

[Corrik Ronis]

Better single player, hands down. The first two got me through hundreds of hours on single player, that is what I come to Mass Effect for.

[Yorkston9152]

single player. the only reason i play multiplayer atm is to feed my need for ME with out going into the soul crushing abyss known as "the ending"

[Jonathan Shepard]

More single-player please. There are parts of the game that feel REALLY rushed, other than the endings.

[Avarenda]

Is this a real question? Of course the answer is single player

[GreyLord]

More fleshed out singleplayer any day of the week.

[Laurcus]

You know, in hindsight, I honestly feel retarded for being, "that guy" on forums that said don't worry guys, multiplayer won't detract from singleplayer in any way!

Knowing now what I know, I really do feel retarded.

Modifié par Laurcus, 01 avril 2012 - 04:43 .

[DukeOfNukes]

The MP is actually a blast...I love it.

It's actually kind of a trick question...for me, the downward slope began in ME2...and ME3 was mostly awesome, except the ending (lots of things bugged me, but no more than ME2 on the whole)

[SillyNydia]

Singleplayer, while it was nice to get a multiplayer, the funds used to create it could have been put to better use. That and the multiplayer has no long term survivability. Waves of enemies over and over will get old after awhile and we'll see it drop off the map completely.

Mass Effect should have always stayed singleplayer only. Take the funds used for multiplayer and pour it directly into the campaign, with more content, interactions and lore to make it the biggest and best campaign Bioware has created for this type of genre. Alas it is what it is and we are stuck with it.

[scomoletti]

Fruit of the Doom wrote...

Gallron395 wrote...

Flawed survey is flawed. You are asking in the story and campaign forum where the readership is most likely inclined to care about sp more than mp. Ask this in the mp forums and the results will likely be different.

That said, sp, of course. 

This is a survey?

I'm not recording any results.  Who is?

Quick count to the end of page 7:
SP = 141
MP = 3

I'd say the players have spoken...

[Artking3]

Single player, I haven't even touched the multiplayer. Getting rid of the multiplayer would have gotten rid of the stupid Galactic Readiness, which seems to be there only because BW did not believe MP could stand on its own merits and needed a combination carrot/stick.

[Hurricane Brad]

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

Single player as multiplayer is for idiots.

Enjoying a different kind of game hardly makes someone an idiot.  If anyone is an idiot here it is you for making an unfounded blanket statement.

[Drenick18]

I'd still want both. no reason to limit ME to just being a SP game, if it can expand it should. that said if I absolutely had to choose only one (still a stupid choice tho. I still want both), I'd choose that they work on SP.

[Kelwing]

I'll take more fleshed out single player FTMFW.

[Tiax Rules All]

SP, duhh

[SinZinDetta]

Single player

[deimosmasque]

It's an unfair question since they were both by different teams, with different budgets AND the mutiplayer was originally meant as a stand-alone FPS: http://www.gamefront...person-shooter/

Modifié par deimosmasque, 01 avril 2012 - 05:51 .

[3Minotaur3]

Even if I play MP a lot more than I though I would, I'd choose SP without hesitation...

Lot of MP games to replace it, but SP games like ME are too few and far between...

[Fruit of the Doom]

deimosmasque wrote...

It's an unfair question since they were both by different teams, with different budgets AND the mutiplayer was originally meant as a stand-alone FPS: http://www.gamefront...person-shooter/

Please read the first post.  If you have trouble, ask someone else to read it aloud for you and then tell you what "hypothetical" means.