If indoc theory is correct, then it's the best ending of all time....
#1
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:55
Also, as a working adult who acutally makes money $10 dlc supporting my fav developers all time is nothing to me. Glad to support Bioware and will continue to do so. Those who have a different opinion or cannot afford DLC I can empathize with that for sure though.
#2
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:56
#3
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:56
#4
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:57
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Ratham wrote...
What if they roll with the Indoc Theory but didn't originally plan it? Then the fans gave them a get out of jail free card. Of course even if this is true they'll still say it was planned all along.
They already at least considered indoctrination. I can't believe so many people missed that info.
#5
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:57
#6
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:57
Day one dlc AND an incomplete ending? Certainly genius. But only from a sales perspective.
Might end up hurting them more than it gained though
#7
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:58
#8
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:59
#9
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:59
Could you explain that?SwobyJ wrote...
They already at least considered indoctrination. I can't believe so many people missed that info.
I wouldn't call it a dream because it's definitely still a fight, though a fight taking place in someone's head. I was hoping the game would bring to bear the psychological issues of Shepard ever since the start of the first game (remember the beginning of ME1?). Shepard has issues and the game has not brought them to the forefront of the plot in any of the games, save for a mere mention in Mass Effect 1 and then a few lines about the pressure Shepard is under in Mass Effect 3, along with the dreams.'it was all a dream' is far from the best ending, and one generally
avoided. I hope they clear some things up..but I would prefer something
else to that
If IT is true, then it finally does bring this point forward and I would have more faith in Bioware's writers to not simply ignore something that should have such a profound effect on Shepard's actions, especially if he's being indoctrinated.
Remember the scene in Final Fantasy 7 where Cloud struggles with the fact of his own life? By all rights, Shepard should be going through something like that. If IT is true, then there should be a scene where all the clues pointing to Shepard's indoctrination are brought up in a montage, and the anger would probably give anyone a second wind and more reason to ****slap the reapers back to hell.
Modifié par Mystiq6, 31 mars 2012 - 11:06 .
#10
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 10:59
I myself am not too bothered by it (not saying I like the endings right now they are terrible), surely a DLC will correct this soon.
However something I can't bring reason into is the "reveal" of a major character's face with a poor photo shop image. I have no idea what they were thinking when they made that. But that's another topic entirely.
#11
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:01
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Mystiq6 wrote...
Could you explain that?SwobyJ wrote...
They already at least considered indoctrination. I can't believe so many people missed that info.
I'll use the words from another forum:
"This particular bit of misinformation keeps getting repeated.
The Final Hours app confirmed nothing.
It
confirmed that indoctrination as a gameplay mechanic (physically losing
control over Shepard's movements during gameplay) was scrapped.
It does NOT confirm that indoctrination as a STORY mechanic was scrapped.
And
many argue that the fact that ANY type of indoctrination was being
considered as late in development as November actually lends creedence
to the indoctrination theory."
Research the Final Hours app.
#12
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:01
#13
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:01
If It is true, then it means Bioware pulled an "unreliable narrator" technique. I argue that if that is the case they did so poorly. Some of the evidence is too subtle. It doesn't just mean the ending we got was an illusion, it means we didn't get an ending at all!
If the reveal comes post-game then all those who moved on from mass effect never to return are lost to the true story. I don't think the writers would want their big reveal to be missed by those newcomer players they emphasized obtaining.
Maybe a good plot device, but poorly executed and not the saving grace the franchise needs.(yes go ahead and pull your dark knight quotes)
Modifié par Narsilsword, 31 mars 2012 - 11:02 .
#14
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:02
#15
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:03
Even if it's put up for free, it's still far from the "greatest ending of all time" because now they've shipped their game without an ending, which is stupid.
Modifié par NPH11, 31 mars 2012 - 11:04 .
#16
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:04
rachellouise wrote...
'it was all a dream' is far from the best ending, and one generally avoided. I hope they clear some things up..but I would prefer something else to that
This. The "it was all a dream/illusion/in their head" is cliche, lazy, and a massive cop out. There are far better ways to end a story.
#17
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:04
#18
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:05
comrade gando wrote...
If they planned it all along, then indeed this would be the greatest mindf--k moment in video games I can recall. Very clever when you notice all the subtleties hinting at indoctrination in the last 10 minutes. However you also must consider that by doing this the developers sold an incomplete game for full price, which brings up a lot of hot topics as far as developer/consumer morals.
However, they wouldn't be the first to do so. In fact 2 very recent games are doing exactly that. Asuras Wrath and the latest Final Fantasy.
Add to the fact that Bioware have sold DLC to ME2 which are pretty significant to ME3 as well as significant day one DLC and ipad apps and isn't such a stretch to believe they could follow the likes of Square Enix and Capcom.
If they did, I'm pretty sure they didn't expect quite the vitriol the current endings received though.
#19
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:05
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Fulgrim88 wrote...
It's also the biggest ripoff of all time.
Day one dlc AND an incomplete ending? Certainly genius. But only from a sales perspective.
Might end up hurting them more than it gained though
I'm not bothered by a free DLC as long as:
-there's closure and epicness
-it doesn't feel just 'tacked on'
I'm not bothered by a paid DLC of $5-15 as long as:
-it's lengthy (at least 5 hours just for ending material, like Shadow Broker or Arrival)
-it has more than just the ending (more N7/co-op missions, multiplay stuff, weapons, story content to flesh things out)
I'm not bothered by a paid $25 content as long as:
-it's like a freakin mini-expansion, with a whole big fight against the Reapers
-there's clear consequences for ALL of my major choices. War Assets my ass.
So if they want to be 'lazy' about it, go ahead, I'm ok with that. But it has to be free DLC for me to care.
#20
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:05
So no ending to the vanilla game at all is the greatest ending of all time??
#21
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:07
It has less closure and resolves less than what we actually got. In that scenario the reaper war is still going on and nothing has been solved. Pretty ****** poor ending to the trilogy if you ask me. If they try to sell 'real' ending DLC to us later I'm done. I'm not going to buy what should have been part of the game to start with. Let's not kid ourselves here, either. This is EA we're talking about, they're going to charge for it.
#22
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:07
Aaleel wrote...
I don't know why anyone would think it was so great. If the IT was planned it means that Bioware intentionally sold players a game with no ending and are going to charge said players to get the ending of the game.
So no ending to the vanilla game at all is the greatest ending of all time??
Only if they charge for it.
It's unlikely but if this was their plan the DLC for it might be free.
#23
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:07
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Narsilsword wrote...
all time? its these types of hyperbolic statements that make me question modern game reviews.
If It is true, then it means Bioware pulled an "unreliable narrator" technique. I argue that if that is the case they did so poorly. Some of the evidence is too subtle. It doesn't just mean the ending we got was an illusion, it means we didn't get an ending at all!
If the reveal comes post-game then all those who moved on from mass effect never to return are lost to the true story. I don't think the writers would want their big reveal to be missed by those newcomer players they emphasized obtaining.
Maybe a good plot device, but poorly executed and not the saving grace the franchise needs.(yes go ahead and pull your dark knight quotes)
I agree with the 'didn't get an ending at all!' part.
But not the subtle part. You're not supposed to Paragon/Renegade yourself out of indoctrination - heck, only the most aware people in the galaxy would even detect what's happening to them. And if the Reapers devised a specific method to wear Shepard down (maybe via his part-cyborg construction) (maybe involving the boy, etc), then its all the more interesting. Again, you're not supposed to KNOW, but you are encouraged to care enough about destroying the Reapers, to take the chance and pick Destroy.
#24
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:09
Modifié par Calibrations Expert, 31 mars 2012 - 11:11 .
#25
Posté 31 mars 2012 - 11:09
IMO there is 3 camps
- Pro Enders(The bad ones) Camp
- Demand A new ending Camp
- Shepard is Indoctrinated Camp
Pro-ender makes it seem like you want the ending to be that and the series to end there.
Indoctrination is that you want the game to expand on the bulls**t that we saw in the last 10 minutes and make out so it was a dream and then add more missions and finish the story the proper way.
That's not pro-ending as that wasn't the end.
And demand a better ending pretty much explains itself, it looks like an impossible task.





Retour en haut






