I'm sorry but I have to ask again.....How many of you are going to pay for a DLC new ending?
#26
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 08:41
#27
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 08:43
#28
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 08:46
Dude_in_the_Room wrote...
A thread about this was on the first page a couple of days ago....but it seems the view has changed in some of the threads I've seen lately.
I'm not giving my opinion on the ending.....I'm not saying whether or not anyone should or shouldn't pay for a DLC ending. This is purely for factual reference for later on and my curiosity.
Do you plan on paying for new "Good" DLC ending?
Any amount is a "yes". "No" means no.
Theres is no middle ground.
For me there is no simple yes or no answer; it is a yes if they decide to do a total remake of the ending. If they, as I suspect, only add small stuff to "clarify" the AI child, then no way am I going to pay for it, since the ending will still be some of the worst writing out there.
#29
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 08:51
However, despite the ending. I would pay for added content or missions depending on how interested I am in them. If it's a retake Omega then I'm out. But interesting Single Player content maybe
#30
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 08:54
#31
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 08:55
Even ME2 was guilty of this. It burnt all its bridges, pointlessly killed Shepard off in what is still the most inscrutable plot decision ever, and sacrificed its own (and the overarching) plot for the sake of Cerberus railroading. Then it invalidated itself with Arrival.phouria wrote...
Yeah this had a very very stark contrast with ME1 and ME2 in tone.
ME3 is what ME2 should have been: gathering alliances. In a series like ME, it makes more sense to have a downer ending as the second part of a trilogy, and dramatically, it would be logical that the reapers arrive at the end of the second act.
#32
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 08:56
#33
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:03
Random Jerkface wrote...
Even ME2 was guilty of this. It burnt all its bridges, pointlessly killed Shepard off in what is still the most inscrutable plot decision ever, and sacrificed its own (and the overarching) plot for the sake of Cerberus railroading. Then it invalidated itself with Arrival.phouria wrote...
Yeah this had a very very stark contrast with ME1 and ME2 in tone.
ME3 is what ME2 should have been: gathering alliances. In a series like ME, it makes more sense to have a downer ending as the second part of a trilogy, and dramatically, it would be logical that the reapers arrive at the end of the second act.
i dunno
ME2 is still my favorite. they sorta arrived? i guess... with the arrival dlc.
Modifié par phouria, 01 avril 2012 - 09:04 .
#34
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:08
Wont pay for ANY DLC for me3 now that the ending has finalized the fate for the ME realm.
#35
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:09
#36
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:12
I won't begrudge you your favourite or belabour you with detail, but you at least have to agree that ME2 had a horrible (and almost non-existent) main plot. Then, after Arrival, it was both horrible and irrelevant.phouria wrote...
i dunno
ME2 is still my favorite. they sorta arrived? i guess... with the arrival dlc.
When I say "the reapers should have arrived at the end of ME2," I mean a full-scale invasion a là how they do in the third game.
Modifié par Random Jerkface, 01 avril 2012 - 09:12 .
#37
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:12
#38
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:24
#39
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:26
#40
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:31
For me, it depends on what they do with it. I'd be willing to pay for an ending worth having if the alternative is that we don't get one. I'm willing to wait as long as that takes. That said, the Mass Effect series is a one-time exception. in this regard. I don't want it to become industry standard to sell you half of a game.
Edit: bad link.
Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 01 avril 2012 - 11:02 .
#41
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:39
Dude_in_the_Room wrote...
A thread about this was on the first page a couple of days ago....but it seems the view has changed in some of the threads I've seen lately.
I'm not giving my opinion on the ending.....I'm not saying whether or not anyone should or shouldn't pay for a DLC ending. This is purely for factual reference for later on and my curiosity.
Do you plan on paying for new "Good" DLC ending?
Any amount is a "yes". "No" means no.
Theres is no middle ground.
knowing Reloaded and Hydra they will make any paying dlc available through torrents the next day, as they too disagree with how mass effect 3's publicity stunts and all big previews were wrong about the game.
#42
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:42
#43
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:47
I don't think we want to be starting down that path, for all our sakes.
And no, I would NOT pay for a DLC'd in ending. In fact if they do release ending DLC, and charge for it (regardless of what other content it brings), then Bioware will have permanently lost one of their oldest and most loyal customers.
Modifié par Saruya, 01 avril 2012 - 09:48 .
#44
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:48
Random Jerkface wrote...
I won't begrudge you your favourite or belabour you with detail, but you at least have to agree that ME2 had a horrible (and almost non-existent) main plot. Then, after Arrival, it was both horrible and irrelevant.phouria wrote...
i dunno
ME2 is still my favorite. they sorta arrived? i guess... with the arrival dlc.
When I say "the reapers should have arrived at the end of ME2," I mean a full-scale invasion a là how they do in the third game.
I thought the plotline of assembling a crew and going on a suicide mission wasn't an outcry of horrendousness? It definitely didnt have the presence like ME1 but the character interactions and gameplay and environments kept me going.
its all matter of opinions. I could say 'i love uwe bowl movies' and it wouldnt really matter logically.
#45
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:49
Saruya wrote...
Paying to get a definitive ending to a game sets a VERY dangerous precedent.
I don't think we want to be starting down that path, for all our sakes.
And no, I would NOT pay for a DLC'd in ending. In fact if they do release ending DLC, and charge for it (regardless of what other content it brings), then Bioware will have permanently lost one of their oldest and most loyal customers.
asking for a change in the ending is ALSO a dangerous precedent.
#46
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:53
phouria wrote...
Saruya wrote...
Paying to get a definitive ending to a game sets a VERY dangerous precedent.
I don't think we want to be starting down that path, for all our sakes.
And no, I would NOT pay for a DLC'd in ending. In fact if they do release ending DLC, and charge for it (regardless of what other content it brings), then Bioware will have permanently lost one of their oldest and most loyal customers.
asking for a change in the ending is ALSO a dangerous precedent.
Really? Is there something worse than them saying "No" that can happen?
#47
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 09:55
Dude_in_the_Room wrote...
phouria wrote...
Saruya wrote...
Paying to get a definitive ending to a game sets a VERY dangerous precedent.
I don't think we want to be starting down that path, for all our sakes.
And no, I would NOT pay for a DLC'd in ending. In fact if they do release ending DLC, and charge for it (regardless of what other content it brings), then Bioware will have permanently lost one of their oldest and most loyal customers.
asking for a change in the ending is ALSO a dangerous precedent.
Really? Is there something worse than them saying "No" that can happen?
if they said 'yes' then it will be.
#48
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 10:02
#49
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 10:03
#50
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 10:03





Retour en haut






