Aller au contenu

Photo

Companion & Romance Wish List for DA3


1536 réponses à ce sujet

#1501
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...

On the contrary, Merrill seems to be the only Dalish elf who refuses to see the difference between evil fade spirits and benevolent ones. Don't you remember how her entire clan freaked out when she began practicing blood magic? Is she smarter than all of them now?


You don't see how Anders explicitly stating that the distinction between spirits and demons is an Andrastian distinction that has to do with Andrastian lore, with the religious belief that the denizens of the Fade are "Children of the Maker," reveals why the Dalish don't share their religious views? You realize the Dalish don't believe in the Maker, they believe in the Creators. I don't see why you're even disputing what is explicitly said by these characters. 

What I can't understand is how you're claiming that Merrill alone holds this belief. Are you seriously suggesting that all Dalish believe in the Maker, and the Andrastian lore of the Chantry?

Naw, you misunderstand me (though it took me awhile to get back on the same page - it's been weeks since we actually talked about this last) - what I was saying was that just because the Chantry believes it doesn't mean that it's
A.) false, or that
B.) no one outside the Chantry believes the same thing.

You can't honestly compare Merrill to the rest of the Dalish we've met and suggest to me that she agrees with the traditional Dalish view on spirits. She chooses not to see any distinction between good ones and bad ones. Conversations with Marethari and the rest of her clan and Lanaya and even the elf trapped in the arcane warrior amulet show that the Dalish understand the danger of possession and consider it foolish to speak with evil spirits. I'm sure you've read Merrill's origin short story - Marethari walks away from the evil spirit as soon as she realizes what it is. She decides it's not worth speaking to and that it has nothing to offer her. When she explains to the clan that Merrill is practicing blood magic they don't respond by saying "so what?" - they kind of freak out the same way that any Andrastian would.

So what I'm saying is that Merrill's views on demons/spirits/blood magic aren't traditionally Dalish at all - they're unique to her, even if they are fueled by her love of her clan and desire to restore their lost knowledge. And that just because the Chantry believes something doesn't mean that the Dalish can't agree. The wisdom of avoiding any fade spirit that's very interested in what happens on the other side of the Veil seems to be something generally agreed upon everywhere but Tevinter. Marethari wouldn't say that Merrill is being very Dalish by speaking to that spirit - she'd say she's being stupid, even if her word for it isn't "demon." Image IPB

#1502
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 990 messages

brushyourteeth wrote...

Naw, you misunderstand me (though it took me awhile to get back on the same page - it's been weeks since we actually talked about this last) - what I was saying was that just because the Chantry believes it doesn't mean that it's
A.) false, or that
B.) no one outside the Chantry believes the same thing.

You can't honestly compare Merrill to the rest of the Dalish we've met and suggest to me that she agrees with the traditional Dalish view on spirits. She chooses not to see any distinction between good ones and bad ones. Conversations with Marethari and the rest of her clan and Lanaya and even the elf trapped in the arcane warrior amulet show that the Dalish understand the danger of possession and consider it foolish to speak with evil spirits. I'm sure you've read Merrill's origin short story - Marethari walks away from the evil spirit as soon as she realizes what it is. She decides it's not worth speaking to and that it has nothing to offer her. When she explains to the clan that Merrill is practicing blood magic they don't respond by saying "so what?" - they kind of freak out the same way that any Andrastian would. 
So what I'm saying is that Merrill's views on demons/spirits/blood magic aren't traditionally Dalish at all - they're unique to her, even if they are fueled by her love of her clan and desire to restore their lost knowledge. And that just because the Chantry believes something doesn't mean that the Dalish can't agree. The wisdom of avoiding any fade spirit that's very interested in what happens on the other side of the Veil seems to be something generally agreed upon everywhere but Tevinter. Marethari wouldn't say that Merrill is being very Dalish by speaking to that spirit - she'd say she's being stupid, even if her word for it isn't "demon." Image IPB

The Dalish don't believe in the Maker, so they wouldn't see spirits or demons, as those are Andrastian labels connected to their religion. This is made explicitly clear. Merrill isn't the only Dalish who doesn't believe in the Maker.

The short stories contradict the game on more than one occasion. Unless Anders is an invincible cannibal, I don't see the point in bringing them up. The actual game made it clear that spirits and demons are Andrastian labels, part of Andrastian religion, and that demons are labeled so because they turned their back on the Maker. Why you insist on arguing against what the game explicitly tells us confounds me.

Marethari is the one who pulls arguments out of her bum, while Merrill studied the lore and extrapolated information from the shard. I value Merrill's intellect over Marethari jumping from one baseless conclusion to another (i.e. her conflicting arguments about the Eluvian that she pulls from thin air and baseless speculation).

#1503
wsandista

wsandista
  • Members
  • 2 723 messages
I'd like a warrior companion who looks like this.

http://t1.gstatic.co...2ASCTIejR6OmYTP

#1504
Flashflame58

Flashflame58
  • Members
  • 901 messages
Female kossith and female Chevalier, kplzthx.

#1505
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

The Dalish don't believe in the Maker, so they wouldn't see spirits or demons, as those are Andrastian labels connected to their religion. This is made explicitly clear. Merrill isn't the only Dalish who doesn't believe in the Maker.

The short stories contradict the game on more than one occasion. Unless Anders is an invincible cannibal, I don't see the point in bringing them up. The actual game made it clear that spirits and demons are Andrastian labels, part of Andrastian religion, and that demons are labeled so because they turned their back on the Maker. Why you insist on arguing against what the game explicitly tells us confounds me.

Marethari is the one who pulls arguments out of her bum, while Merrill studied the lore and extrapolated information from the shard. I value Merrill's intellect over Marethari jumping from one baseless conclusion to another (i.e. her conflicting arguments about the Eluvian that she pulls from thin air and baseless speculation).

Merrill, Marethari, and Zathrian all talk about spirits frequently. I really have no idea where you got the idea that the Dalish religion doesn't recognize them. True, they don't believe the story about the Maker creating them, but they definitely agree that they're real. That's not just a chantry thing, that's a mage thing. Any mage will tell you that both spirits and the fade are real. Anders is pretty doubtful about Andrastianism but he and Marethari both agree that there are malevolent spirits in the Fade. They don't have to take the Chantry's word for it  or believe the creation/rejection story - they've actually met both kinds. It's why she goes to such great lengths to help Feynriel and prevent him from losing control. Spirits get angry/selfish/whatever and take over people's bodies and ruin their lives. That's just a fact in the world David Gaider has written.

As to Merrill being more educated in the Dalish religion than Marethari is, that's obviously something you really want to believe because the whole blood magic thing interests you and that's fine.


Why you insist on arguing against what the game explicitly tells us confounds me.


Indeed! It seems we're destined to confound each other, you and I. Image IPB
And since we're involved in kind of a two-person conversation, we should probably either drop it or move it to a private message. I'm fine with just accepting that you interpret the Thedas lore very differently than I do.

Modifié par brushyourteeth, 16 juin 2012 - 08:01 .


#1506
Guest_Avejajed_*

Guest_Avejajed_*
  • Guests
I love Brushyourteeth.

#1507
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

Avejajed wrote...

I love Brushyourteeth.


aw, hooray!!
I think you're pretty freaking awesome too. Image IPB

#1508
Maleficarium

Maleficarium
  • Members
  • 55 messages
You know what would be awesome, a companion of Avvari origins like Kell! : D Kell's character was simply amazing and I couldn't get enough of his awesomeness! Granted, that was Kell himself and not all Avvars but we'd heard enough of them in DAO/DAA why not a companion?

I'd also love a f!kossith as a companion/romance! Also, this goes without saying I'd love some saarebas in your party!

Adding-
I forgot to mention if you could have someone return as a companion!
Rhys/Evangeline would be pretty amazing!
Cassandra or Galyan would be crazy awesome but I'm sure most of us assume Cassandra anyways. haha
Aaand...oh! Nathenial, Maker yes! Companion/romance of Nathaniel would be a very glorious day!

Modifié par Maleficarium, 17 juin 2012 - 09:25 .


#1509
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 990 messages

brushyourteeth wrote...

Merrill, Marethari, and Zathrian all talk about spirits frequently. I really have no idea where you got the idea that the Dalish religion doesn't recognize them. True, they don't believe the story about the Maker creating them, but they definitely agree that they're real. That's not just a chantry thing, that's a mage thing. Any mage will tell you that both spirits and the fade are real.


You misunderstood me. I’m not claiming the Dalish don't believe in the existence of spirits, I'm addressing that the Dalish don’t adhere to the Andrastian view of spirits and demons – which is why I provided an excerpt from a conversation between Merrill and Anders about the Fade and the denizens of the Fade, where Anders’ makes it clear that spirits and demons are tied to Andrastian religious teachings, while Merrill talks about spirits from a different mindset as a Dalish elf who doesn’t share his religious views. Allow me to provide it here:

Anders: Do Dalish honestly not recognize the difference between demons and beneficial spirits?

Merrill: We've never thought of the Fade as the home of our gods. It is another realm, another people's home. No different or more foreign than, say, Orzammar.

Varric: You can say that again.

Anders: But have you never studied the types of demons? They break down very clearly into different sins...

Merrill: Spirits differ from each other, just as you and Hawke and Isabela are all human. More or less...

This is the crux of my statement. Merrill and the Dalish believe in spirits, but not in the Andrastian view of spirits and demons, which is tied to the Andrastian religious teachings of the Andrastian Chantry. The fact that Anders says demons are sins is a sign that his views are Andrastian, which explains why Merrill doesn't share them. Merrill uses the term ‘spirits,’ but not in the same fashion as Andrastians do. She doesn’t see them as “Children of the Maker” like Anders and the Andrastians do, she views them as denizens of the Fade who are as different and varied as humans on Thedas are. She doesn’t view some spirits as “demons” and I’m not sure why you think any Dalish would – as Anders makes it clear that demons are spirits who turned their back on the Maker. Why would the Dalish believe some spirits turned their back on the Maker, when they believe in the Creators? That makes no sense.

The Dalish have different views about it than Andrastians do. For instance, the Dalish call the Fade the “Beyond.” I don’t know why you think the Dalish would adhere to Andrastian teachings on spirits and demons, when the distinction between spirits and demons (in Andrastian terms) is tied directly to the Andrastian faith. Contrary to what you think, Merrill made it explicitly clear that she views all spirits as “dangerous,” because there’s no such thing as a “good spirit” in her eyes.

Despite the denizens of the Fade being different, that doesn’t mean the Chantry is correct. As Merrill says, humans on Thedas are varied and different – but they are, nevertheless, human. It’s no different with Merrill’s argument to Anders that, despite being different, the spirits of the Fade are simply that – spirits. Not spirits and demons in the Andrastian sense.

brushyourteeth wrote...

Anders is pretty doubtful about Andrastianism but he and Marethari both agree that there are malevolent spirits in the Fade. They don't have to take the Chantry's word for it  or believe the creation/rejection story - they've actually met both kinds. It's why she goes to such great lengths to help Feynriel and prevent him from losing control. Spirits get angry/selfish/whatever and take over people's bodies and ruin their lives. That's just a fact in the world David Gaider has written.


Actually, Anders is a firm Andrastian, with the distinction being that he doesn't believe in the Chantry controlled Circles. However, he believes in the fable of the Golden City (Tevinter Amulet), and he constantly argues with Merrill because her Dalish views conflict with his Andrastian views (as you can see from the excerpts of their dialogue). However, the existance of dangerous spirits doesn't necessitate the idea that the Chantry is correct about their version of spirits and demons. I'll allow Merrill explain that one:

Merrill: Are you all right?

Anders: I nearly killed an innocent girl. How could I be all right?

Merrill: I'm sorry.

Anders: You're sorry? For me? This could be you! You could be the next monster threatening helpless girls!

Merrill: Anders... There's no such thing as a good spirit. There never was. All spirits are dangerous. I understood that. I'm sorry that you didn't.

As Merrill explains, all spirits are dangerous. That doesn't mean the Chantry's religious teachings about their version of spirits and demons is correct.

brushyourteeth wrote...

As to Merrill being more educated in the Dalish religion than Marethari is, that's obviously something you really want to believe because the whole blood magic thing interests you and that's fine.


What does the Eluvian have to do with the Dalish religion? I specifically addressed the subject of the Eluvian, not the dichotomy between Andrastian and Dalish religious teachings, when I addressed that Merrill “studied the lore and extrapolated information from the shard,” while Marethari basically went from one baseless assumption about the Eluvian to another. I trust Merrill over Marethari because Merrill actually did the research on the subject on the Eluvian (based on what Gaider explained in the forums), while Marethari doesn’t seem to have put in the same effort based on her flimsy and ever-changing arguments about the Eluvian.

brushyourteeth wrote...
Indeed! It seems we're destined to confound each other, you and I. Image IPB
And since we're involved in kind of a two-person conversation, we should probably either drop it or move it to a private message. I'm fine with just accepting that you interpret the Thedas lore very differently than I do.


It’s not a matter of interpretation when the characters make it explicitly clear:

Anders: Maybe you don't really understand the difference between spirits and demons.

Merrill: Did I ask you?

Anders: Spirits were the first children of the Maker, but He turned his back on them to dote on His mortal creations. The ones who resented this became demons, driven to take everything mortals had and gain back the Maker's favor.

Merrill: Your "Maker" is a story you humans use to explain the world. We have our own stories. I don't need to borrow yours.
 
Right from the mouths of the characters themselves.

Modifié par LobselVith8, 17 juin 2012 - 01:37 .


#1510
Kidd

Kidd
  • Members
  • 3 667 messages

Avejajed wrote...

I love Brushyourteeth.

I'd like to second this notion.

#1511
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 990 messages

Avejajed wrote...

I don't know about you people, but my Hawke wasn't lazy or incompetent.


Well, my Hawke didn't stop Petrice when she told him her plans. My Hawke didn't do anything with his wealth besides punch people and wear a smoking jacket. My Hawke didn't investigate the note in Quentin's lair. My Hawke didn't do anything for three years after Act II. My Hawke stood idly by while someone was murdered right in front of him. He was extremely passive, which was my issue with the protagonist. I was hoping to see him display cunning and intelligence while he rose to power by dealing with political factions and earning the favor of the refugees and the elves, rather than what was provided in the actual narrative. To me, Hawke comes across as lazy and incompetent. I'm certain we can agree to disagree about this issue, though.

Avejajed wrote...

My Hawke was a complete and utter bad ass. And if your Hawke was, well....you created him.


I didn't create Hawke. I only shaped his image. I didn't even know what he was going to say most of the time, because the paraphrasing is so ridiculously bad that most of what he said was a surprise. Then there were the auto-lines of dialogue, where he would speak without any imput from me. How does that make Hawke my character when he says things that are outside of my control?

And if I want my Hawke to be an atheist, I have no choice in the matter, because Hawke is an Andrastian who believes [this person] is "with the Maker."

#1512
FaWa

FaWa
  • Members
  • 1 288 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Avejajed wrote...

I don't know about you people, but my Hawke wasn't lazy or incompetent.


Well, my Hawke didn't stop Petrice when she told him her plans. My Hawke didn't do anything with his wealth besides punch people and wear a smoking jacket. My Hawke didn't investigate the note in Quentin's lair. My Hawke didn't do anything for three years after Act II. My Hawke stood idly by while someone was murdered right in front of him. He was extremely passive, which was my issue with the protagonist. I was hoping to see him display cunning and intelligence while he rose to power by dealing with political factions and earning the favor of the refugees and the elves, rather than what was provided in the actual narrative. To me, Hawke comes across as lazy and incompetent. I'm certain we can agree to disagree about this issue, though.

Avejajed wrote...

My Hawke was a complete and utter bad ass. And if your Hawke was, well....you created him.


I didn't create Hawke. I only shaped his image. I didn't even know what he was going to say most of the time, because the paraphrasing is so ridiculously bad that most of what he said was a surprise. Then there were the auto-lines of dialogue, where he would speak without any imput from me. How does that make Hawke my character when he says things that are outside of my control?

And if I want my Hawke to be an atheist, I have no choice in the matter, because Hawke is an Andrastian who believes [this person] is "with the Maker."


Can we give this man a medal please?
Also I do particularly enjoy how all 3 different "voices" sound like different kinds of douchebag. 
AND NO MORE RAPIST HAWKE. The flirt lines for Merril was like a pedophile wandering around a Catholic school.

Modifié par FaWa, 17 juin 2012 - 02:46 .


#1513
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

KiddDaBeauty wrote...

Avejajed wrote...

I love Brushyourteeth.

I'd like to second this notion.

Aww. Image IPB Thanks for the love, guys!
It's mutual. Image IPB

I think it'd be fun to have someone in the party that you love to hate. Sten was someone I loved but it took us a long time together before we started to see eye to eye. Loghain wasn't my favorite but I still really loved seeing him in the party because it was so interesting. I thought some of the best DA:O dialogue was when Morrigan totally hated you. I think it'd be new and interesting to have a companion that you just can't please. Kind of like Carver, only you know... around for the whole game and with a more compelling reason to dislike/annoy you than "I'm jealous."

Of course that would make the approval system kind of weird, but maybe they're just so gruff or guarded that their approval of you doesn't necessarily mean that they're going to be warm and friendly. It may manifest itself in surpring ways, like having them suddenly stand up for you in a pivotal moment of the plot where you would have had a different outcome without his/her approval.

Modifié par brushyourteeth, 17 juin 2012 - 07:42 .


#1514
schalafi

schalafi
  • Members
  • 1 167 messages
I wish I had time to read all 60 pages, but I don't, so I apologize if this has already been covered.

All I want in a romance is that it lasts through the entire game, not a quickie in Act 2, then nothing, no kiss, no love talk, etc. In Act 3 just about all Anders said to me was "I think we should be concentrating on the task at hand," when I clicked on him, and then the brief talk before the last battle, I wanted a kiss!

Next, I want a love scene that isn't fully clothed, including boots, and in Ander's case, a knife. If it had been pointed forward my Hawke would have been gutted! Let us just have "some" reality in love scenes, I am not looking for full nudity, just some realism. Why was my fem Hawke able to be seen in her undies on the street, but not in the bedroom? Same with male Hawke. What possible reason would they be parading in their underwear in public?

There were other instances when a hug or kiss would have been appropriate, like when Hawke and Aveline escaped getting killed in Act 2 by the Arishok. All Anders said was "You're safe, thank the Maker, I thought they got you." Really romantic that wasn't!

Certainly the writers can't make the whole game one big romance, and I'm not looking for that at all, but I can't imagine why the scenes were so far from what I would have put in the game. Origins did it far better, and you could kiss your LI almost any time you wanted.

Please Bioware, make DA3 have more realistic and lasting romances.

Modifié par schalafi, 17 juin 2012 - 08:03 .


#1515
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages
I would like this in DA3:

Image IPB

#1516
durasteel

durasteel
  • Members
  • 2 007 messages
I want Morrigan as a companion, but with NO romantic possibilities. Her romance should be set as of the end of Witch Hunt, but I still want to spend hours and hours listening to Claudia Black be snarky, clever, funny, and rarely vulnerable. Please.

#1517
rapscallioness

rapscallioness
  • Members
  • 8 027 messages

LolaLei wrote...

I would like this in DA3:

Image IPB


yes, please.

Oh, and for me, I would also love to have Balthier from Final Fantasy...12? Yes, 12. As comapnion and LI.

Can you do that, BW? Can you just poach a character like that? I won't tell.

I adored Balthier. He was my leading man after all. sighs

#1518
schalafi

schalafi
  • Members
  • 1 167 messages

rapscallioness wrote...

LolaLei wrote...

I would like this in DA3:

Image IPB


yes, please.

Oh, and for me, I would also love to have Balthier from Final Fantasy...12? Yes, 12. As comapnion and LI.

Can you do that, BW? Can you just poach a character like that? I won't tell.

I adored Balthier. He was my leading man after all. sighs


Oh YES, PLEASE!!!

#1519
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

schalafi wrote...

I wish I had time to read all 60 pages, but I don't, so I apologize if this has already been covered.

All I want in a romance is that it lasts through the entire game, not a quickie in Act 2, then nothing, no kiss, no love talk, etc. In Act 3 just about all Anders said to me was "I think we should be concentrating on the task at hand," when I clicked on him, and then the brief talk before the last battle, I wanted a kiss!

THIS THIS THIS!!!

Next, I want a love scene that isn't fully clothed, including boots, and in Ander's case, a knife. If it had been pointed forward my Hawke would have been gutted! Let us just have "some" reality in love scenes, I am not looking for full nudity, just some realism. Why was my fem Hawke able to be seen in her undies on the street, but not in the bedroom? Same with male Hawke. What possible reason would they be parading in their underwear in public?

You know, I'm not super big on the whole "lets make a more realistic sex scene" thing, but I absolutely did find it weird that Keran and Ruxton Harriman were the only shirtless men in the entire game. You guys went to all that trouble designing underwear, cleavage, and muscly pectorals - how come we only ever see it on Hawke, Merrill, Keran, and Ruxton and his elf mistress? I'm fine with people in their undies. Maybe it seems weird to have everyone in the world wearing the same kind, but the devs could just change colors between characters, right?

Case in point:
Image IPB

Excellent candidate for shirtlessness. Someone worked really hard on this body model and we almost never saw it. Why were we missing all this eye candy in DAII?

thank you, Cullen. You can get out of Varric's chair now. Image IPB

Modifié par brushyourteeth, 18 juin 2012 - 04:14 .


#1520
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages

brushyourteeth wrote...

You know, I'm not super big on the whole "lets make a more realistic sex scene" thing, but I absolutely did find it weird that Keran and Ruxton Harriman were the only shirtless men in the entire game. You guys went to all that trouble designing underwear, cleavage, and muscly pectorals - how come we only ever see it on Hawke, Merrill, Keran, and Ruxton and his elf mistress? I'm fine with people in their undies. Maybe it seems weird to have everyone in the world wearing the same kind, but the devs could just change colors between characters, right?

Case in point:
Image IPB

Excellent candidate for shirtlessness. Someone worked really hard on this body model and we almost never saw it. Why were we missing all this eye candy in DAII?

thank you, Cullen. You can get out of Varric's chair now. Image IPB


It's decided then: the DA team like to tease us with "the one thing we always wanted, but you could never have."







(Didja see what I did there?... Anyone? No? Pfft.) :blink:

Modifié par LolaLei, 18 juin 2012 - 04:22 .


#1521
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

LolaLei wrote...

It's decided then: the DA team like to tease us with "the one thing we always wanted, but you could never have."







(Didja see what I did there?... Anyone? No? Pfft.) :blink:

I see what you did there. Image IPB
And like Anders, we may have to lie awake for three years aching for it, but hopefully we'll get it in the end.Image IPB

#1522
Guest_Avejajed_*

Guest_Avejajed_*
  • Guests
Just quoting this for the hell of it.

LolaLei wrote...

I would like this in DA3:

Image IPB



#1523
Guest_Avejajed_*

Guest_Avejajed_*
  • Guests

LolaLei wrote...

I would like this in DA3:

Image IPB


Quoting this for the hell of it.

#1524
Guest_Avejajed_*

Guest_Avejajed_*
  • Guests
Twice even! Whatever it's my thread and I'll do what I want to it.

#1525
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages

Avejajed wrote...

Twice even! Whatever it's my thread and I'll do what I want to it.



Double the fun!